Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-02-06 Council Packet - Work SessionAGENDA 1 KENAI CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION ; / FEBRUARY 6, 2013 — 5:30 P.M. KENAI, ALASKA KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 210 FIDALGO AVE., KENAI, AK 99611 http: / /www.ci.kenai.ak.us 2013 KENAI RIVER DIPNET FISHERY A. Introduction - Rick Koch, City Manager B. Presentation of Management Alternatives for 2013 Kenai River Dipnet Fishery — Rick Koch, City Manager C. Council Discussion and Public Comment D. Adjournment All meetings are open to the public and participation is encouraged. Agendas and supporting documents are posted on the City's website at www.ci.kenai.ak.us . For additional information, please contact the City Clerk's Office at 907 - 283 -7535 ext 231. u January 26, 2013 Speaker Mike Chenault Rep. Harriet Drummond Rep. Neal Foster Rep. Max Gruenberg Rep. Bob Herron Rep. Shelley Hughes Rep. Andrew Josephson Rep. Beth Kertulla Rep. Gabrielle LeDoux Rep. Cathy Munoz Rep. Kurt Olson Rep. Dan Saddler Rep. Geran Tarr Rep. Peggy Wilson Dear Representative: "Vill49e with a Past, C# with a Future" 210 Fidalgo Avenue, Kenai, Alaska 99611 -7794 Telephone: 907 - 283 -7535 / Fax: 907 - 283 -3014 www.ci.kenai.ak.us . Rep. Alan Austerman Rep. Mia Costello Rep. Bryce Edgmon Rep. Eric Fiege Rep. Les Gara Rep. Lynn Gattis Rep. David Guttenberg Rep. Mike Hawker Rep. Pete Higgins Rep. Lindsey Holmes Rep. Doug Isaacson Rep. Craig Johnson Rep. Scott Kawasaki Rep. Wes Keller Rep. Jonathan Kreiss - Tomkins Rep. Bob Lynn Rep. Charisse E. Millett Rep. Benjamin Nageak Rep. Mark Neuman Rep. Lance Pruitt Rep. Lora Reinbold Rep. Paul Seaton Rep. Bill Stoltze Rep. Steve Thompson Rep. Chris Tuck Rep. Tammie Wilson The purpose of this correspondence is to provide information, discuss, and request your assistance and support in creating a process to mitigate impacts to Alaskan municipalities /areas affected by Personal Use Fisheries. Following this introductory letter are several pages of photographs showing the impact of the State Personal Use Fishery which takes place at the mouth of the Kenai River on an annual basis. These photographs are typical, in other words they were not chosen because they show the most negative conditions. The Personal Use Fishery which takes place at the mouth of the Kasilof River results in similar conditions. In 2012, the City of Kenai incurred expenditures of approximately $365,000 in support of /reaction to the Fishery. These expenditures were for police, emergency medical services, parks & recreation, solid waste, permanent and portable human waste, fish waste management, dock/boat launch management, public works support, and overall municipal management. To offset these expenses the City collected fees for camping, parking, and boat launch activities totaling approximately $362,000, or $3,000 less than expenses. While the City attempts to manage fish waste to a small degree, we are unsuccessful, to a greater degree each year as the Fisheries popularity has grown and harvest levels have increased. In 2012, we estimate that between 400,000 Ibs and 800,000 Ibs of fish waste was deposited on the beaches at the mouth of the Kenai River. The volume of fish waste generated by the Fishery has become untenable, and the residents of Kenai are demanding that the City of Kenai enact law /policies /programs that eliminate the problem. City Administration has developed alternatives with cost estimates to manage fish waste more effectively. The Kenai City Council, and members of the public, which have testified at several Council work sessions on this issue, desire to see a process, or processes, in which fish waste is collected at various locations on the beaches, and disposed of in a legal manner off -site from the Fishery. This most likely would be accomplished by dumping the fish waste either in federal waters or in a, yet- to -be- constructed, dedicated land -fill cell at the Kenai Peninsula Borough Solid Waste Land Fill. There are significant start-up and ongoing operational costs for either of these two alternatives. To date there have been no viable proposals to collect and create a value -added product from the low -grade fish waste. The cost estimate to remove /dispose of fish waste from the beaches is $250,000 4400,000, over current City expenditures. Presently, there is no permit fee for a Personal Use Fishery Permit, the requirement is that you are an Alaskan resident and you have a Sport Fishing License. We recognize that some Personal Use Fishery participants would not otherwise have a fishing license. We request that you support legislation which would separate a Personal Use Fishery Permit from a Sport Fishing License. We further suggest that a permit fee of $25 be required for each person over 16 years of age on the permit, and that these revenues are utilized to assist municipalities, areas, and the State to mitigate /eliminate the negative impacts of the Fisheries. In 2009, 2010, and 2011, the average number of Personal Use Fishery Permits issued was 31,908, say 32,000. The following are assumptions of total fishery participants, and projected revenue generation given the above proposal: Total Number of Permits 32,000 Number of Individuals per.Permit X 3.2 Total Number of Participants 102,400 Number of Participants over 16 years 70,400 of age Projected Revenue ($25 /Participant) $1,760,000 The following is a suggestion for distribution of revenue: Kenai River -City of Kenai (35 %) $616,000 Kasilof River -State of Alaska (20 %) 352,000 Other Site - Specific Fisheries (10 %) 176,000 Capital Improvements (i.e. Kenai 264,000 Peninsula Borough Landfill Cell)(15 %) State of Alaska Administrative Costs (20 %) 352,000 Total Distribution $1,760,000 The above revenue distribution is only for demonstration and not meant to serve as a specific suggestion. By the State collecting a fee on the front -end of the process, rather than the City of Kenai collecting fees from only parking, camping , and boat launching, all Fishery participants share in the expense of services and mitigation of negative impacts caused by the Fishery. Just yesterday I was made aware the Representative Seaton was considering legislation similar to the suggestions contained in this correspondence. The Kenai City Council, residents of Kenai, and the City of Kenai Administration respectfully request your consideration. Thank you for your attention in this matter. Sincerely CITY OF KENAI Pat Porter, Mayor Rick R. Koch, City Manager CITY OF KENAI IMPACTS OF PERSONAL USE FISHERY y IIWL Ar 774 �s _y':. „- HOUSE BILL NO. X "An Act creating a personal use fishing license; and establishing the personal use fishery fund." BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA: * Section 1. AS 09.50.020(c) is amended to read: (c) In this section, "recreational license" means a recreational fishing license or recreational hunting license. In this subsection, (1) "recreational fishing license" means a sport fishing license under AS 16.05.340 unless that license is required for participation in [PERSONAL USE FISHING, AS DEFINED IN AS 16.05.9409 OR] subsistence fishing, as defined in AS 16.05.940 and modified by decisions of the Alaska Supreme Court; (2) "recreational hunting license" means a hunting license under AS 16.05.340 unless that license is required for participation in subsistence hunting, as defined in AS 16.05.940 and modified by decisions of the Alaska Supreme Court. New Section added as follows: (3) personal use license means a license for the taking, fishing for, or possession of finfish, shellfish, or other fishery resources, by Alaska residents for personal use and not for sale or barter by means other than hook and line, such as with gill or dip net, seine, fish wheel, long line, or other means defined by the Board of Fisheries; * Sec. 2. AS 16.05.340 is amended by adding a new subsection to read: (k) Notwithstanding 5 AAC 77 each resident shall obtain a personal use fishing license and pay a personal use fishing license fee of $25. In addition to the personal use license fee a personal use permit may be required under 5 AAC 77 for each fishery the person or household participates in during the year. The personal use fishery fund is established and shall be administered by the Department of Revenue. Notwithstanding AS 16.05.110(a), personal use fishing permit fees shall be deposited into the fund and may be appropriated for administrative and other costs incurred by the Department of Fish and Game, Department of Public Safety, local or borough governments and other land managers to cover expenses incurred as a result of personal use fisheries. Nothing in this subsection creates a dedicated fund. * Sec. 3.. AS 16.05.400 is amended to read. (a) A license is not required of a resident or nonresident person under the age of 16 years for sport fishing nor is a license required of a resident under the age of 16 for personal use fishing, hunting or trapping. * Sec. 4. AS 37.05.146(c) is amended by adding a new paragraph to read: (87) Personal use fishery fund (AS 16.05.340(k)). Fate of Personal Use fishing permits after TWO reminders, 1996 to 2011 YEAR Permits Permits Permits s Percent Issued Returned Returned Returned 1996 14,576 13,452 1,124 8% 1997 14,919 13,756 1,163 8% 1998 15,535 13,190 2,345 15% 1999 17,197 14,216 2,981 17% 2000 16,107 13,582 2,525 16% 2001 16,915 14,398 2,517 15% 2002 17,568 14,284 3,284 19% 2003 19,110 15,726 3,384 18% 2004 21,910 17,748 4,162 19% 2005 21,905 19,081 2,824 13% 2006 18,563 16,532 2,031 11% 2007 23,046 20,312 2,734 12% 2008 23,722 20,259 3,463 15% 2009 29,619 25,029 4,590 15% 2010 31,590 25,222 6,368 20% 2011 34,515 27,181 7,334 21%