Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1996-10-09 p&z packet
CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION **AGENDA** Council Chambers, 210 Fidalgo October 9, 1996, 7:00 p.m. http://www.Kenai.net/city 1. ROLL CALL: 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: September 25, 1996 4. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD: 5. CONSIDERATION OF PLATS: 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. PZ96-64-Variance Permit-Side Yard Setbacks (Sanders)-Lot 8, Block 4, VIP Ranch Estates (825 Baleen Avenue) 7. NEW BUSINESS: a. PZ96-65-Home Occupation Permit (Ischi)-Lot 16, Block 8, Inlet View Subdivision, Third Addition, Part 2 (300 Rogers Road) b. November and December Meetings 8. OLD BUSINESS: 9. CODE ENFORCEMENT ITEMS: 10. REPORTS: a. City Council b. Borough Planning c. Administration 11. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED: 12. INFORMATION ITEMS: a. Decision-Board of Adjustment-Prime Residential Zone b. KPB Notice of Planning Action (9/23/96) c. Planning & Zoning Commission Roster 13. COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS: ~ 14. ADJOURNMENT: ~ CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 25, 1996 ***MINUTES*** BARBARA NORD WAS SWORN IN BY M. KEBSCHULL. 1. ROLL CALL: Members present: Carl Glick, Phil Bryson, Teresa Werner-Quade, Ron Goecke, Barb Nord, Karen Mahurin, Mike Christian Members absent: None Others present: Councilman Hal Smalley, City Engineer Jack La Shot, Administrative Assistant Marilyn Kebschull 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: GOECKE RECOMMEND APPROVAL AS PRESENTED. NOTED ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ITEMS WHICH WERE PASSED OUT AND NOT ON AGENDA. CLICK CLARIFIED THAT TWO OF THE ITEMS WERE ON THE AGENDA. GOECKE ASKED FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT. MAHURIN SECONDED. AGENDA APPROVED. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: September 11, 1996 September 16, 1996 (Information Only) GOECKE MOVED FOR APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 11, 1996 AND ASKED FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT. MOTION SECONDED BY BRYSON. MINUTES APPROVED. 4. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD: 5. CONSIDERATION OF PLATS: a. PZ96-63-Mission Estates Preliminary Plat GOECKE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF PZ96-63 MISSION ESTATES PRELIMINARY PLAT. MAHURIN SECONDED THE MOTION. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 Minutes September 25, 1996 ~~ Chairman Glick asked for any additional staff report. La Shot advised this is a city plat noting this plat would formally establish right of way for the existing Mission Street through the church area and ties into Alaska Avenue. This plat would give the city a right of way to construct the Mission Street Improvement Project next summer. Christian asked if this would be a widening or paving. La Shot advised it will be paved and there will be additional parking established noting bus parking on Overland. Paving will be single lane project to tie back into Alaska Avenue and more parking in front of church property. Christian asked if this would be paving Mission all the way around. La Shot advised aloop-type situation. Christian stated he assumes because it is a one lane road they will not be taking much of lawn from the Bay Arms. La Shot advised just a little bit. La Shot noted parcels one and two are from private property owners noting the street will get into those lawns a little bit. La Shot noted there has been an archeological study also done on project that can be reviewed. Mahurin stated she would share that when she was on the TSH Board this was the first projects dealt with and there was a lot of public input. Mahurin advised it was TSH that asked for the archeological study adding it has gone through a lot of hoops prior to this plat. Bryson asked if the acquisition along Overland Avenue was for the bus parking-La Shot advised yes. Bryson asked if the remainder if part of the presently used right of way. La Shot noted that street has never had formal right of way adding it has just gone through the church property and across private property. Bryson asked if the property that would remain on the church proper is all outside of the fence, the present picket fence? La Shot asked if he was referring to 192-82 and advised yes noting the fence won't be moved. La Shot stated that on Overland the chain length fence will be relocated around old fort. VOTE: BRYSON YES WERNER-QUADE YES GOECKE YES NORD YES MAHURIN YES CHRISTIAN YES GLICK YES UNANIMOUS. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. PZ96-61-Encroachment Permit-Side Yard Setbacks (Bowlin)-Lot 4, Block 1, Inlet View Subdivision (425 Rogers Road) GOECKE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PZ96-61, AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR BOWLIN. NORD SECONDED THE MOTION. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes CLOSED. Page 3 September 25, 1996 Glick asked for additional staff comment. La Shot added that on his report he would like to change the encroachments which he had said were 2 inches and 4 inches and would like them changed to 2/10th and 4/10th of a foot. La Shot noted that on the application the applicant made a statement that the surveyor is no longer available. La Shot noted the asbuilt was stamped by Roy Whitford who is in the area. La Shot noted he didn't think there was any attempt to shed bad light on the surveyor. Bryson, noting that the house was built in 1978 and the asbuilt was done in 1986, so the surveyor happened to be carrying the message in this case but apparently they didn't acknowledge it at that time. VOTE: WERNER-QUADE YES GOECKE YES NORD YES MAHURIN YES CHRISTIAN YES BRYSON YES GLICK YES UNANIMOUS. b. PZ96-62-Variance-Single Family Dwelling on a Collector Street in a General Commercial Zone (Schoolcraft), Lot 14, Block 2, Thompson Park Subdivision (265 Fireweed) WERNER-QUADE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF PZ96-62. MOTION SECONDED BY GOECKE. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED. Loretta Schoolcraft-P.O. Box 3197, Soldotna-Schoolcraft advised that she wanted to make a home for herself and her three kids and that she works hard and would like it passed. Werner-Quade asked if she had purchased the property recently before deciding to move the home. Schoolcraft advised she wanted to purchase the property so she could move it. Werner-Quade clarified she hadn't yet bought the property. Schoolcraft stated they have completed the paperwork and it has been sent to the owner in Juneau. Werner- Quade stated she is asking because when she looked into the property herself she noted it was zoned commercial. Werner-Quade stated she wondered if Schoolcraft knew that. Schoolcraft stated the owner had made an agreement to sell her lot 14, Jim Beedle out of Juneau. Nord asked if she had original pictures. Schoolcraft noted they were not with her tonight adding she had found out this afternoon that it was a good idea to be at the meeting. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 4 Minutes September 25, 1996 .~ Christian asked what she was intending to do with the structure. Schoolcraft noted it was across the street on Fireweed and that it would be placed on a full basement. Christian asked if it had windows noting it was difficult to see from the pictures they had been given. Christian asked if it was a two story building. Schoolcraft advised it was two stories and that it would have a loft and be handicap accessible to the loft. Schoolcraft noted she just wanted to start it out as a residence so she could get some stability for herself and her children and then build from there. Mahurin, noting this was being asked from curiosity, asked if with young children in commercial area if she was thinking about going into business in the future. Schoolcraft advised she would probably like to obtain the lot next to it and open a B&B but right now was focusing on this project. Michael Rowden-5615 Kenai Spur Highway, Kenai-Rowden noted he is the owner of Lot 6 and 17, of block 2, formerly Beaver Wood Products. Rowden stated he had had to retire on a disability but noted he has 23 years invested in that commercial property. Rowden stated he and "Bob Holt," who lives on the next lot behind him, had tried to figure out how to put their businesses in. Rowden commented that this city doesn't allow anything noting he was supposed to be classified as light industry. Rowden stated the only place was in town was the lots near the new courthouse or down by the cannery. Rowden noted they couldn't afford the lots and that they had came to the council and they had it fixed in the ordinance and were not given a variance until the ordinances were straightened out they could go ahead and move in there. Rowden stated the cabinet shop wasn't supposed to go in there. Rowden stated that Bob has built on the other side two story building with an apartment upstairs. Rowden stated they bought because it was commercial property. Rowden stated Mr. Beedle bought because it was commercial property and he was hoping to make a profit off it. Rowden commented that Beedle is living in Juneau now and trying to sale it because things didn't pan out and he is not interested in whether or not it is commercial. Rowden said you will note there are commercial lots all around it. The house on the corner on Lot 12 was originally a Lindall Cedar Home that was built as an office. Rowden stated it sat for a long time until they turned it into a house. Rowden asked, once you start doing this, where will it stop. Rowden stated he is looking at his investment noting he doesn't know how much longer he will be able to stay here with his physical condition. Rowden stated he wants to be able to sale property as commercial property. Rowden noted that the ordinance says, except for the ground floor noting as he understands it you cannot live on the ground floor. Rowden commented that that little building will be awful small to live upstairs. Rowden stated he could see if the primary purpose is commercial and if residence is secondary as we did, that is one thing. Rowden stated he felt it was slapping him in the face because he bought it as commercial property and would still be in business today if it wasn't for his physical problems. Rowden stated eventually if I have to sale he wants to be able to sale as a commercial piece of property. Rowden commented he doesn't like the house in front but it is out of the way. This one will be where there are commercial lots all the way around it, the three lots on the front touches it, and the lot on both sides are still commercial property. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 5 Minutes September 25, 1996 Rowden commented that if she bought the other lot first and started with something else and then put in house that may be okay. Rowden commented that he didn't think it was fair to start out with a house and is not suitable. Not fair to Bob Holt or the rest of us there. Rowden commented he doesn't want to start seeing a bunch of variances issued. Rowden stated that he knew where the One Stop went in those people all bought commercial property and then tried to fight the One Stop going in. Christian asked if the other people started out as residences or businesses. Rowland stated they started out as businesses. Rowden further explained how the fish camp had came about. Christian stated he was wondering if historically they started out as residences or businesses. Rowland reiterated they started out as commercial added that was why he and Bob came because originally the ordinance that was ruled commercial said you couldn't live in as place of residence. But, said at the bottom said all urban commercial ordinances apply and you could live in your place of business as long as your front entrance to the house wasn't the front door to your business. Rowden stated that was when they finally said he could live there. Rowden commented that he was a single person and had a house and couldn't afford a house and a business too. Rowden explained how they went in as a business. Mahurin asked when he started his business. Explained they bought the lot in 73 and put the building there in 73 and he had managed it unti175 and then he bought it. Mahurin stated she moved in to Thompson Park in 71 and Mr. England and his family had a personal home there. Mahurin stated she didn't mean to argue but that was a home long before it became a business out of there. Rowland stated England was an electrician and had an electrician's truck there. Rowden stated that was the reason he was able to buy it off of J.W. and he was an electrician. Rowden stated he didn't have a business building and stock electrical parts but he had an electrical truck and he was doing electrical business out of there. PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED. Glick asked if La Shot had additional staff comments. La Shot noted nothing additional. Bryson asked La Shot to what degree is there a mixing of uses in that commercial zone. Bryson stated he is aware of the attempt to restrict the use to commercial and the request that was denied by P&Z. La Shot stated that to his knowledge the only true house is a small house at the fish camp that could be use as a residence part of the year and above Beaver Wood Products is an apartment which is an allowable secondary use in that manner. La Shot noted you can have a residence as long as it is not on the ground floor facing a collector street. La Shot noted he is not sure about all the other buildings in the area adding he believed most are businesses. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 6 Minutes September 25, 1996 ~,~ Mahurin stated she knows that Adams (?) has property in there and they have a huge warehouse with a one bedroom apartment which is next to Beaver Wood Products. Rowden stated that was originally Bob Holt's building. Werner-Quade asked concerning the special assessment district if it matters if it is residential or commercial as to the assessment. La Shot responded no noting they are assessed by square footage. Glick noted a letter from Robert and Patricia Holt who have Holt construction and they live in an apartment there. Glick noted there is one lot between them and this property. Werner-Quade noted that in her opinion we have been begged to consider zoning along the Spur Highway corridor and to consider commercial zoning at least from Swires down east to Morgan Steel. Werner-Quade stated she knew where this property was located and noted she had written to the owner about the property. Werner-Quade noted she felt it might not be the best to give up a segment of the commercial property in that area. Mahurin stated she felt she was missing a point. This is an unusual situation, usually the Commission is being asked to give residential to commercial. Mahurin noted that across the street P&Z denied Benton's request to rezone to commercial who appealed to Council and it was granted. Mahurin noted that she understood what Mrs. Schoolcraft is trying to do on a shoe string. Mahurin noted that that side of her will win and will vote yes. Mahurin noted she had listened to the arguments and cannot see any reason to vote no. Goecke agreed with Mahurin adding that she knows that it is commercial and that eventually she will want to do a B&B in that area. Goecke noted that as long as it is commercial she wouldn't have to come back for a CUP. Goecke noted she is not asking for rezoning she is asking to be allowed to put a residence in a commercial zone. Goecke stated he has no problem with this whatsoever. Bryson stated he somewhat feels the same way stating he feels the structure if there is a commercial demand a structure such as this can be quickly converted to commercial use because it will pay higher rent or removed for the same reason. Bryson agreed that because not being asked to rezone but for a variance will be in favor. VOTE: GOECKE YES MAHURIN YES BRYSON YES GLICK NO NORD YES CHRISTIAN YES WERNER-QUADE YES MOTION PASSED 6 TO 1. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 7 Minutes September 25, 1996 } 7. NEW BUSINESS: S. OLD BUSINESS: 9. CODE ENFORCEMENT ITEMS: 10. REPORTS: a. City Council Mr.Smalley noted the copy of agenda in packet. Item 2a tabled. This was the purchase of new floats to be extending the dock floats further into the river to get them further away so when the tide goes down. Smalley reported this was put on hold to have the City Engineer look at the product to make sure it is what we want because they are purchased. Council decided to do this before they are purchased. Smalley noted this is not a lot of money but why spend $6300 if they won't work. Smalley reported in the work session we worked on the Capital Project Matching Grant and water clarity and quality is still number one concern. Smalley noted Item 5 was removed from the agenda. On page two, the coffee maker at the Senior Center broke and so they purchased a new one. Smalley commented that the coffee maker was a lot cheaper than the ones that the Army buys. Item G, the Council set out the advertisement for the city manager. The closure date is December 15. It will run from November 1 to December 15. Council approved a contract with Kathy Scott and Associates to work on getting space within the city to upgrade the public health facility. Smalley noted the state is too broke to help them out so the city is looking at larger facilities. Smalley noted the health center has outgrown their space adding that the city could use the space. Under H-5 the clean up of the FAA grounds was discussed and the possibility of the city obtaining a couple of the buildings there. Item 6, street lights, there were 11 or 12 new street lights that will be put in. Smalley noted that two are $25 each and that they can go as high as $3300. Smalley noted he has the list if anyone would like to look at it. b. Borough Planning Bryson noted the agenda is in the packet for the September 23rd meeting. The regular and consent agendas approved. Item E1 continued to be postponed. Under public hearings, the first item approved a vacation of a portion of Mansfield Avenue. Item 2 was a resolution reclassifying Borough properties. Bryson noted this was a request by the administration, the major portion to rural and other portion for a waste handling site. After considerable input from residents, the Commission recommended that the parcel be classified to rural and that solid waste keep looking for another site. A vacation not requiring a public hearing was approved. The special consideration for a building setback was approved for the existing structure only. Bryson stated Item H2 was an ordinance authorizing the Mayor to sell property to the Smith family in Planning & Zoning Commission Page 8 Minutes September 25, 1996 Cooperlanding. The ordinance 96-43 was recommended to be defeated by the ~ Commission. Bryson noted this is a situation wherein the borough doesn't own the property yet. Bryson stated the people who had some time ago requested to purchase the land were now requesting a conditional sale agreement. Bryson stated the Borough required to sale at fair market value at time the Borough receives title which Borough doesn't have. All plats were approved. Under the Kenai River Habitat there were two items, one proposed construction of car port, outside of city, was narrowly approved. The second one, within the city of Kenai, was an application to construct bank protection in the industrial area of town. Bryson shared photographs of the area. This was approved. The other items on the agenda were decisions that were relayed by administration. The Planning Director had ruled that two borrow pits were grandfathered in. Bryson noted that both are being appealed by borough residents so will be coming before the Borough Planning Commission as a Board of Adjustment. Werner-Quade, referring to the carport discussed at the last meeting that had been denied and then went to appeal and was allowed, Werner-Quade stated she would like to keep abreast of the situation. Bryson noted they have had five carport situations, one was approved and four were denied. One of the four petitioned and the Assembly upheld the complainant in that case. Bryson noted that was reversed. Bryson noted that in this situation the individual had submitted a building plan in 1991 and had presumably had all this work in the mill. That was the feeling of the majority of the Commission. Bryson shared a picture of the area where the carport would be placed. Smalley asked to share a map of the 40 acre tract off Marathon Road showing a depiction of what is planned for the site including the Challenger Center and the Fire Training Center. Smalley stated he though they were talking about $4 million for the Challenger Center and they are seeking funding. La Shot noted the Fire Training Center budget is at $8.1 million. La Shot stated the administration has worked on this quite some time and it has just now gotten to Public Works and are in the process of negotiating with engineers, etc. Goecke asked if the Challenger Center was at $4 million dollars. Smalley stated that was the most recent figure and that the city has not dedicated any money at this time. They are trying to get corporate funding as much as possible now. Smalley stated they city will probably put funding in as the land etc. Goecke asked if there is not enough private money at this time, the city could come out with a bond issue. Smalley stated that is always a possibility. Goecke asked about how this would pay for itself. Smalley stated he couldn't say yes or no. Smalley stated the idea is that it will be bringing in funds to take care of the general operation and that it would be used by students from across the state. Goecke asked if there were letters stating that from school districts across the state. Smalley stated the state school board representing 53 districts is behind the project. Goecke asked again is there were any letters from districts themselves. Smalley stated he didn't know. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 9 Minutes September 25, 1996 Goecke asked about the Fire Training Center at $8.1. Smalley noted that 94 percent is federally funded adding that he doesn't know if they have letters of interest in the project. Smalley stated there is one in Salt Lake City and one scheduled in Seattle area. La Shot stated there are at least a dozen in the lower 48. Goecke stated that realistically what we have is the only people we could have a chance of drawing to this is firefighters from within Alaska. Smalley stated no. Goecke ,asked to be corrected if he was wrong, noting that every metropolitan area is in a money crunch and he cannot see them sending firefighters to Alaska when they could drive to schools. Smalley stated the Alaska Fireman's Association is very much behind the project. They are also tying in major airlines, Korean, JAL, going to foreign countries that have in the past flown through Alaska. Smalley noted those people have to be trained. Smalley stated they are required to have three trainings per year. Smalley stated the city had been looking at a way to bring enterprise into the city. Goecke commented he felt we were making a job for our soon to retire fire chief. Smalley stated he didn't think so adding he felt Goecke was out of line. Goecke stated he felt we were in the days of diminishing income for the residents of the city and are all of a sudden trying to spend tax payers money. Smalley noted he has the same concern and is not willing to spend a lot of the city's money. Werner-Quade stated that when we had the joint session they mentioned possibly hiring a lobbyist. Smalley stated it will be discussed at the next council meeting. La Shot commented, regarding the Fire Training Center, that 94% of the funding was coming from federal funds the remaining 6% comes from the airport fund so no local tax dollars will come into the picture. La Shot noted the city may be involved in the operation but the plan says those fees should be taken care of in operation and maintenance costs. c. Administration La Shot reported that the TSH Board met last night. They discussed the grant the city received to install information signs in the Historic District. The report that was just completed identified 34 properties and there was money funded for 30 signs. The board will be working with the Rotary Club. The grant will purchase the materials and the Rotary will construct them. They talked about moving their meetings which has yet to be approved by council. They reviewed the Mission Street project. There is a draft of the sign ordinance that they will review at their next meeting and then it will come back to Planning and Zoning. Christian asked if we had heard anything more from the landscaping plan that was tabled at last meeting. La Shot stated he had missed the deadline adding that he doesn't plan to break ground until spring. 11. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED: Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes ~~ 12. INFORMATION ITEMS: Page 10 September 25, 1996 a. Public Hearing Notice dated 9/16/96 b. Administrative Approval Strawberry Fields Forever SD c. Memo regarding changes to zoning maps dated 9/19/96 d. Planning & Zoning Commission Roster e. Appointment Letter to Barbara Nord (9/19/96) 13. COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS: Mahurin welcomed Barb Nord to the commission. Nord noted she is thankful to be here. Werner-Quade welcomed Nord and thanked Kebschull for including the ice rink study with the packet materials. 14. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at approximately 8:03. Respectfully submitted: Marilyn Kebschull Administrative Assistant ~' CITY OF KENAI ~ 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 _ FAX 907-283-3014 ~ uFa~lnah 1III~1 1992 CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The following public hearing has been Scheduled for the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of October 9, 1996: An application for a Variance Permit for a Variance to encroach into the side yard setback 4.5 feet for the property described as Lot 8, Block 4, V.I.P. Ranch Estates (825 Baleen Avenue), Kenai, Alaska. The Meeting will commence at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. Anyone wishing to present testimony concerning this permit should do so at the hearing or submit written comments to the City of Kenai, Planning Department, 210 Fidalgo, Suite 200 Kenai Alaska 9961 1-7794 prior to October 9th. For more information please contact Jack La Shot or Marilyn Kebschull at 283-7933. YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE BECAUSE YOU OWN/LEASE PROPERTY WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE PROJECT SITE OR ARE AN INTERESTED PARTY September 24, 1996 STAFF REPORT To: Planning & Zoning Commission Date: October 24, 1996 Prepared By: JL/mk Res: PZ96-64 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Delman J. Sanders P.O. Box 31 Kenai, AK 9961 1 Requested Action: Variance-Encroach into side yard setback Legal Description: Lot 8, Block 4, VIP Ranch Estates Existing Zoning: RR-Rural Residential Current Land Use: Low Density Residential ANALYSIS City Engineer: The applicant wishes to place a garage near his existing house that would encroach into the required 15' side yard setback 4.5'. The adjacent property owner has written a letter of non-objection. Building Official: No additional comments. RECOMMENDATIONS Approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. PZ96-64 2. Application 3. Drawings C TY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION ND. PZ 96-64 VARIANCE A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI GRANTING A VARIANCE AS AUTHORIZED BY 14.20.180 OF THE KENAI ZONING CODE: Applicant : Delmar J. Sanders Located: Block 4, Lot 8, V.I.P. Ranch Estates WHEREAS, The Commission finds that Section 14.20.180 provides that a variance from the strict provisions of the zoning code may be granted by the Commission if all conditions specified in 14.20.180 are met, and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission finds: 1) That an application meeting the requirements for a variance has been submitted and received on September 23, 1996. 2- That this request is located on land zoned RR-Rural Residential 3) That the applicant seeks a variance from the specified requirement of the Zoning code: 15 foot side yard setback. 4) a. Special conditions or circumstances are present which are peculiar to the land or structures involved which are not applicable to other lands or structures in the same land use or zoning district. b. The special conditions or circumstances have not been caused by actions of the applicant and such conditions and circumstances do not merely constitute pecuniary hardship or inconvenience. c. The granting of the variance does not authorize a use that is not a permitted principal use in the zoning district in which the property is located. d. The granting of the variance is the minimum variance that will provide for the reasonable use of the land and/or structure. e. The granting of the variance is not based upon other non-conforming land uses or structures within the sale land use or zoning district. 5) That a duly advertised Public Hearing according to KMC 14.20.153 was held October 9, 1996. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI THAT THE CONDITIONS SPECIFIED IN 14.20.280 HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO EXIST AND THEREFORE GRANTS THE VARIANCE. PASSED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, OCTOBER 9 , 1996. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: Planning Secretary BICEtiTEVVIAL ~i~a9e axll~a ~ tCi~mdl~a ~u~e ~ r,~® ~r ~{, DATE : ~ G R ~`OL ~8 CITY OF KENAI ~~ 210 Fidalgo Avenue w Kenai, Alaska 99611 TELII'HONE 283-7535 ~ FAX 907-283-3014 .W APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE PERMIT ----, l NAME: m a r J ~an O~Qi'S MAILING ADDRESS : ~ D ~dOX' PHONE : 02 S-3 3a~ l LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED: ~~ 7' ~j~ ~ ~ ~. ~~ ~r41~C~ ~~~ ZONING DISTRICT (Circle one): C RR RR-1 RR-2 RS-1 RS-2 RU/TSH CC CG IL IH R Section 14.20.180 of the Kenai Municipal Code outlines regulations for Variance Permits which is the relaxation of the Development Requirements Table to provide relief when the literal enforcement would deprive a property owner of the reasonable use of his real property: PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING, COMPLETE THE BLANKS AND INITIAL THE SPACE AFTER THE ITEM NUMBER TO INDICATE THAT YOU HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THESE CONDITIONS. 1. Provide a site plan of the property including location of all existing and proposed buildings or alterations, elevations of such buildings or alterations, and such data as may be required. 2. A Public Notification and Hearing is required before the issuance of this permit. A $105.00 non-refundable deposit/advertising fee is required to cover these notification costs. (Please see attached procedure sheet) 3. Special conditions or circumstances are present which are peculiar to the land or structures involved which are not applicable to other lands or structures in the same land use or zoning district. 4. X The special conditions or circumstances have not been caused by actions of the applicant and such conditions and circumstances do not merely constitute a monetary hardship or inconvenience. VARIANCE APPLICATION ~; Page 2 5. The granting of the variance does not authorize a use tht is not a permitted principal use in the zoning district in which the property is located. 6. The granting of the variance is the minimum variance that will provide for the reasonable use of the land and/or structure. 7. The granting of a variance shall not be based upon other non-conforming land uses or structures within the same land use or zoning district. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS : ..~ W•tSY1 b-~ UCA~,1(l~.N~l`.2~ ~e.~w~,r~ Applicant's Signature: CHAIRPERSON Attest: Marilyn Kebschull, Secretary Approved: C:\WPDOCS\FORMS\VARIANCE.PG2 l _ __ - ~ - - - -- _. _ __ ... _ __ _ TZ a c~J,~-Q ~ d _S_ ~ ~ _.~_., .. -- - ~.;._ ''ff ~a~°~onzky aenc,~ W ~, /~~~ /o' 5„ - lay ~c~ .~, i.` a~' ~a5 ~I~ ~ -~~o~ ~ Dort' 9 ~. I ~ ~.a„~~ ~sr' ~/ ~,~~ ~I~k ~ krt' 8 I. r~ I~~n~~ ~sT' ~o' ~„ ~~ ~s' ~~~~~ ~ 49 -40 ~. ~ ~~C. ~ I "= ZUU' G°~'~ PA R7' Unr~ 76-169 ,~ ~'``U 13 7-.v ~Oli,E. .S/'Y' _ 30 ' r2/W /28P io~94t~ 3yb.96' /p /QLYo' /28' ' ~~/' h °`36_ lU 11 IZ l3 1-¢ 3.15 , o I.O,~. `~ - o 'h 360, oo ' . ~ b /33.81' /28' w .. .. /2B' n /.D~~-'. 2!o/.S/' 9 /45.a4',7 b 3yL.96' /(pb p• N ae~ 3•/G. 9G ' 17 . 'so. , ~ ~ ti ."o ~ ~ 360.00' G ` N 8 '~ 6 ~ . 9? ,lc. ~ h ~l ~ O ~ ry .9i i'IC. ~ 3S~i.9G' /p" ~ h /.O3.k. ~ ~ Q B K. b '.O ~ ~b• ~ ~ ~ 3b 0.00' S ~ ~ 5~ rE.. " . q~ ,~~. W ,~ r COURT ' A ^ , 3•Vb. 96' /9 ` Q b Y ~ K ~ V ~~ 7ds2' ~ ap b h v /.OSi1C. ~ V 4 p. h . 9 2 ./a. . r( 360. oo' ~{ Vt $ 1.34 h' ~ ~ ® h op - O a O h .O.fc. ` ~' ado. oa' 3 ~ Q ~n .95A~. N .97 AG. ~` 3S/6.9G' 2/' ~ h O ~rl ^ /.as./c. ~ / D.OD' /75.00' iSe//.66' ` .92.~C. s~•~' Z s~,/b.9b z2. ti ® ~ ~t T N E E o 52 r /, 03 .~c . ~ ~ ~ . 9? ,/e. ® ~ 3© o' ! w h ® sy b• 23~ o (~ .'= n n ~ w k. .k. At. a S M ~ /. 0~1' ~C. ~ b . 9s ./G. 33'R93' ~ ~ ~so• asa.vv 17 20 ~sso• /~JTN .1YENaE sw 3a ,e/w IB 19 K-8>- 99) ex. Yl P R~ nr'cN ~sr~ r~s ,~ ~ - Assessor's Map Kenai Peninsula Borough, Alasko NOTE - Assessor's Stock Numbers Shown in Ellipses ~a STAFF REPORT To: Planning & Zoning Commission Date: October 3, 1996 Prepared By: JL/mk Res: PZ96-65 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Vallschi 300 Rogers Road Kenai, AK 9961 1 Requested Action: Home Occupation Permit Legal Description: Lot 16, Block 8, Inlet View Subdivision, Third Addition, Part 2 Existing Zoning: RS-2-Suburban Residential 2 Current Land Use: Medium Density Residential ANALYSIS City Engineer: The applicant has indicated that all work is by telephone/computer. No traffic to the home is anticipated. The applicant did not submit a plan; however, it should not be necessary for this. Building Official: No building code issues. RECOMMENDATIONS ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. PZ96-65 2. Application .~I CLTY OF KENAI PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PZ 96-65 HOME. OCCUPATION PERMIT A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI GRANTING A REQUEST FOR A HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT AS AUTHORIZED BY 14.20.230 OF THE KENAI ZONING CODE, FOR: An Independent Referring Travel Agency located at 300 Rogers Road and operated by Val Ischi WHEREAS, the Commission finds: 1. That an application meeting the requirements of Sec.14.20.230, has been submitted and received on October 2, 1996 . 2. That the application has been reviewed by the Commission at their meeting of October 9. 1996 and found that all application requirements have been satisfied. 3. That the applicant has demonstrated with plans and other documents that he can and will meet the requirements and conditions as specified. 4. That the following additional requirements have been established by the Commission as a condition of permit issuance: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Kenai that the applicant has demonstrated that the proposed development meets the conditions required for said proposal and therefore the Commission authorizes the permit. PASSED by the Planning & Zoning Commission of the City of Kenai, Alaska, this 9th day of October 1996. A E T: Planning Secretary 1 Chairman ~, Date: C~ j~ 86 ~~ ~~ r N w~ ,~v HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT NAME : ~G~ l ~ PHONE : - ADDRESS: `2GD LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: DESCRIPTION OF OCCUPATION: Section 14.20.230 of the City of Kenai Municipal Code outlines regulations which allow Home Occupations in residential zones, subject to the following conditions: PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING, COMPLETE THE BLANKS AND INITIAL THE SPACE AFTER THE ITEM NUMBER TO INDICATE THAT YOU HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THESE CONDITIONS. employed in the home occupation. 2. ~~`L No more than 30~ of the gross floor area of all buildings on the lot shall be used for the home occupation. Please submit site plan with square footage and area clearly marked where business will take place. 3. The home occupation shall be carried on wholly within the principal building, or the buildings which are accessory thereto. Any building used for a home occupation shall be wholly enclosed. Will is development require a building permit?~ YES NO (circle one) 1. ~ Not more than one person outside the family shall be Applicant's Signature: Approved: CHAIRPERSON 1791-1991 CITY OF KENAI ~~a~ e~~~ ~- , 210 FIDALGO KEN SKA 811 TELEPHO 3-7535 FAX 9 83-30141 to i/ N ATTEST: Date: ~~ Memorandum Date: October 3, 1996 To: The Planning & Zoning Commission ,.~ . From: Marilyn Kebschull, Administrative Assistant RE: NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER MEETING DATES At their meeting on October 2, 1996, Council voted to hold their second meeting in November on November 13"' which conflicts with your November 13"' meeting. Council suggested you find another location or move your meeting to another day. Your second meeting in November falls on the 27"' which is the night before Thanksgiving. Your current meeting schedule places your second meeting in December on Christmas day. The Commission needs to decide what to do about these conflicts. The KMC does not require that you meet every two weeks. Administration has conferred with both the City Attorney and City Manager. It is felt that if the Commission decided to meet only once in November and December and published this information, that would satisfy the public meeting requirements. PLEASE DECIDE, BY MOTION, HOW YOU WANT TO PROCEED BY EITHER RESCHEDULING OR CANCELLING THE MEETINGS. Ib0. AGENDA RENAI CITY COIINCIL - REGULAR MEETING OCTOBER 2, 1996 7:00 P.M. RENAI CITY COIINCIL CHAMBERS http://www.Renai.net/city A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Approval 4. Consent Agenda *Al1 items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non-controversial by the Council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. B. BCHEDIILED PIIBLIC COMMENT (10 Minutes) ~ro~~ 1. Bob Seymour - KCHS Hockey Booster Club Request for ~© ~~~~~ Advertising. C. PIIBLIC HEARINGS ~~~ ~O 1. Ordinance No. 1719-96 - Amending Kenai Municipal Code /%~~ 13.40.020 to Impose a Minimum Fine for Unlawful Operation of an Off-Road Vehicle on Bike Paths or G~- 1~ Improved Rights-of-Way Within the City. ~~~ 2. Ordinance No. 1720-96 - Increasing Estimated Revenues ~~ and Appropriations by $125,000 in a New Capital Project Fund Entitled, "Taxiway Extension North." 3. Ordinance No. 1722-96 - Increasing Estimated Revenues ~~y~'yLuf~~ and Appropriations by $15,105 and Intrafund Transfers yuad~ ~~~ by $4,572 in the Kenai Dunes Restoration Project Due to Increased Costs. P~~ ~ a. Motion for Introduction b. Motion for Second Reading (Requires a Unanimous Vote ) c. Motion for Adoption -1- 4. Resolution No. 96-66 - Accepting the Donation of Cement ~~~ ~~~~ Piling From Cherrier-King. ~n r~~~ ~ ~~~ a . Remove from Table . ~nt- C~=~%~%~k ,~~~~'~'jb. Consideration of Resolution No. 96-66. /~%~ ~r~ ail/ ~~5.J97~ Resolution No. 96-71 - Awarding a Contract for Consultant Services on the Project Entitled, "The Alaska Regional Aircraft Fire Training Center to ~yg~ Gf• Morrison Maierle, Inc., for the Not-to-Exceed Amount of $169,000. 6. Resolution No. 96-74 - Adopting an Alternative ~~ffi~P.G~ ~• Allocation Method for the FY97 Shared Fisheries Business Tax Program and Certifying That This Allocation Method Fairly Represents the Distribution of Significant Effects of Fisheries Business Activity in the Cook Inlet Fisheries Management Area. ~~~~ ~. 7. Resolution No. 96-75 - Requesting Municipal Assistance Funding from the State of Alaska. 8. Resolution No. 96-76 - Designating the Kenai Water ~~~ ~' Quality and Quantity Development Program, Wellhouse No. 1 & 2 Modernization and Upgrade Project as the City of Kenai's Number One, Overall Capital Improvement Project. 9. Resolution No. 96-77 - ~~l~7BGL ~' of Lake Clark National Kenai, Alaska. 10. Resolution No. 96-78 - ~~~ ~• Construction of the Ke: Restoration Project to Total Basic Bid Amount Supporting a Continuing Presence Park and Preserve Offices in Awarding a Contract for the nai Beach Dunes Habitat Peninsula Construction for the of $109,705. D. COMMISSION/COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Council on Aging 2. Airport Commission 3. Harbor Commission 4. Library Commission 5. Parks & Recreation Commission 6. Planning & Zoning Commission 7. Miscellaneous Commissions and Committees a. Beautification Committee b. Historic District Board c. Challenger Steering Committee d. Kenai Visitors & Convention Bureau Board -2- E. MINIITES 1. *Regular Meeting of September 18, 1996. 2. *9/16/96 Kenai City Council/Planning & Zoning Commission Joint Work Session Notes. 3. *Correction to Kenai City Council Meeting Minutes of July 17, 1996. F. CORRESPONDENCE G. OLD BIISINESS None. H. NEW BIISINESS ~~0~7dP.fjf 1. Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified ~~~~/p~, 2. Purchase Orders Exceeding $2, 500 3. *Ordinance No. 1721-96 - Amending the Kenai Municipal Code by Amending KMC 23.25.060(e) to Bring it in Conformity With AS 23.05.080 Regarding Employer Record Keeping of Hours Worked by Exempt Employees. ?''~"~~~ ~4. Discussion - Kenai River Habitat Restoration and ~` ~u'`~' ~ Restoration Enhancement Project/South Side of Kenai ~'~ jO~ ~ River Mouth . ~~~' ~'~,~~~ Discussion - November Meeting Calendar - AML i~lzo yne~' ~°~, Conference/Scheduling of Student Government Day. // !~ ,r /~//~ ~i~ BECIITIVE SESSION - City Attorney Evaluation and Inlet Woods Litigation. I. ADMINISTRATION REPORTS 1. Mayor 2. City idanager 3. Attorney 4. City Clerk 5. Finance Director 6. Public Works Director 7. Airport Manager J. DISCIISSION 1. Citizens (five minutes) 2. Council R. ADJOIIRNMENT -3- ~~p~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE CITY OF KENAI ~ ~ ~' IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF ) THE DENIAL OF THE CREATION OF ) A PRIlbiE RESIDENTIAL ZONE BY ) MICHAEL CHRISTIAN ) Case No. BA-96-1 DECISION The appeal of Michael Christian is DENIED. BACKGROUND On February 7, 1996 Michael Christian sent a letter to the Kenai Planning & ~ Zoning Commission (Commission) proposing a new suburban residential zone called the Prime Residential Zone (RP). The primary features of the proposal were: restriction of buildings to single family dwellings; large lot size (15,000 sq. ft. ); underground utilities; paved streets; preservation of mature trees; and connection to City water and sewer. On April 10, 1996 the Commission held a work session to discuss the proposal. On April 18, 1996 Jack La Shot, City Engineer, prepared an analysis for the proposed RP zone for the Commission. On May 22, 1996, after public notice, a hearing was held on Resolution PZ96-41. The proposed resolution recommended adoption of the RP zone. Five members of the public, including Michael Christian, testified at the public hearing. After debating the issue, the resolution passed by a vote of 4 to 2. During the Commission's meeting June 12, 1996, the Commission voted to CITY OF KENAI BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DECISION -Page 1 of 5 '1 reconsider Resolution PZ96-41 by a vote of 5 to 2. Public notice of the reconsideration was given and the matter was taken up by the Commission on July 24, 1996. Three people testified at the new public hearing. After debating the issue, the Commission voted against Resolution PZ96-41 by a vote of 4 to 2. On August 15, 1996 Michael Christian filed an appeal of the Commission's decision to the Board of Adjustment under KMC 14.20.290. A public hearing on the appeal was held before the Board of Adjustment on September 4, 1996. Michael Christian was the only person to testify at the public hearing. DISCUSSION AND FINDINGS The proposed .zone would include a minimum lot size of 15,000 square feet. Tilt is more than twice the 7,200 square foot minimum lot size for the existing RS, RS2, R[.I and TSH zones. The zone would restrict building to single family dwellings and prohibit conditional and accessory uses. It would also establish the following development requirements: (1) 15,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size; (2) Structure must be connected to City water and sewer; (3) Utilities must be underground; (4) Streets must be paved; (5) Subdivisions must have two separate 60' street accesses; (6) 35 % of the mature trees must be preserved by the developer; (7) Individual accesses must befall-sized and paved; and (8) Street lighting must be installed sufficiently to have overlapping beams. One of the reasons given in support of the proposed zone is the assertion that cwrnent Kenai subdivisions such as Woodland and Redoubt have deteriorated to the point that "there isn't a good subdivision left in Kenai." Part of the deterioration, it is argued, is CITY OF KENAI BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DECISION -Page 2 of 5 ~ lack of enforcement of subdivision covenants by the property owners due to inactive homeowner's associations. The proposal seeks to establish good subdivisions by enactment and enforcement of strict development guidelines enforced by the City. The proposal, however, does not contain any property which is included in the zone. Instead, it would be a hollow zone-a zone with no land. It is argued that it could be used in the future. However, we see nothing in the record on behalf of any developers or future home builders indicating they will want their property to be included in such a zone. Moreover, the record indicates the restrictive lot size and development requirements would make it difficult for development of property on an economically feasible basis. Here we refer to the April 18, 1996 memorandum of Jack La Shot outlining 1 the development costs (BA-3C~. On that basis we do not foresee any current or future demand for developers or home builders requesting to be included in such a zone. Homes in the upper level price range are currently being built in Kenai and we see nothing from those developers or home builders requesting such a new zone. We cannot agree with the statement that there are "no good subdivisions left in Kenai. " If the homeowners feel there are problems with lack of enforcement of covenants, the homeowners have the right to seek enforcement of them.2 Some members of the majority do, however, think that a less restrictive single family subdivision zone may be needed in the future in Kenai and that increase of the lot size from 7,200 square feet to 10,000 square feet may be warranted. But we feel those are decisions to be made in the future when the land to be included in such a zone is identified-not within the context CITY OF KENAI BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DECISION -Page 3 of 5 ~~ of this appeal. CONCLUSION For the reasons listed above, the appeal of Michael Christian is DENIED and the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission is upheld. DATED this ~ ay of October, 1996. During the public hearing before the Board of Adjustment, Michael Christian stated he would be willing to reduce the requirement to 12,500. Z We recognize that such enforcement may be difficult when a neighborhood's Homeowners' Association is inactive; however, homeowners' concern over such covenants should prompt action to revitalize such associations illiams, Bannock, Council Member Bookey, Council tuber H Smalley, Council ber CITY OF KENAI BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DECISION -Page 4 of 5 DISSENTING OPINION We disagree with the majority's decision in this matter. We do not feel the development requirements for the proposed zone would stifle development; nor do we feel it is inappropriate to have a zone on the books for future use. We feel having such a zone on the books would make it easier for a developer to build a single family residential development as called for in the Prime Residential zone. We would grant the appeal of Michael Christian. f ,, a DATED this ,~. day of October, 1996. v'~, e~ Jo ore, Council Member ~~ ~~1~i -r D C~ YL- da Swarner, Co ncil Member ~ ~ vyc.,- .~~~ GL~ ~lz.e._ lYt ~~c. Measles, Council Member CITY OF KENAI BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DECISION - Pege 5 of 5 ~~~ '~~ .. . September 27, 1996 Nr m, N 0~`ai ~~ O N ~+ ~ r ti M~~~ ~ wti'" 1~~Z6L 81. Li.sti~~~~ NOTICE OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 23, 1996 RE: ' Ryan Subdivision Richmond Replat Preliminary Plat The proposed preliminary plat was conditionally approved by the Kenai Peninsula Borough Planning Commission. The conditions of approval are stated in the attached draft minutes. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Kenai Peninsula Borough Planning Department. This notice and unapproved minutes of the subject portion of the meeting were sent September 30, 1996 to: City of: City of Kenai, 210 Fidalgo Street, Suite 200, I:enai, Alaska 99611. Advisory Planning Commission: n/a Survey Firm: Integrity Surveys, 605 Swires Drive, Kenai, Alaska 99611. Subdivider/Petitioner: Bill Richmond, P.O. Box 3152, Kenai, Alaska 99611. Kenai Peninsula Borough Planning Department 144 North Binkley Soldotna, Alaska 99669-7599 (907) 262-4441, extension 260 FAX (907) 26~ ~ 1: KPB File Number: 96-183 AGENDA ITEM I. CONSIDERATION OF PLATS 2. Ryan Subdivision Richmond Replat KPB FILE 96-183 [Integrity Surveys] STAFF REPORT Location: James Street within the City of Kenai Proposed Use: Residential/Recreational Zoning: Suburban Residential (RS) Sewer/Water: City (Routine Preliminary) PC Meeting 09/23/96 Supporting Information: This proposed subdivision will combine Lots 2 and 3, Ryan Subdivision, into one lot. On August 14, 1996 the Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission recommended preliminary approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Grant approval of the preliminary plat subject to any above recommendations, and the following conditions: REVISE OR ADO TO THE PRELIMINARY PLAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN KPB 20.12 AS FOLLOWS: 1. Provide name/address of owner(s). 2. Provide date of this survey. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL OF FINAL PLAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 20: 3. Provide or correct dedication and/or approval statement(s) with notary's acknowledgement as needed. 4. Survey and monumentation to meet Ordinance requirements or an exception having been granted. 5. Show block number. 6. Conform #o conditions of KPB Planning Commission Resolution 78-6. 7. ADEC signature -compliance with regulations in effect at such time as plat is finalized. 8. Compliance with Ordinance 90-38 (Substitute) -Ownership. 9. Compliance with Ordinance 90-43 -Easement definition. 10. Compliance with Ordinance 93-59 -Payment of all taxes due prior to final approval. If final approval and filing the plat is sought between January 1 and the tax due date, the full amount of the estimated taxes will be on deposit with the Finance Department. END OF STAFF REPORT MOTION: Commissioner Clutts moved, seconded by Commissioner Whitmore-Painter, to grant approval of the preliminary plats Item 1.2. Ryan S/D Richmond Replat; KPB File 96-183; Item 1.3. Schlereth S/D Sanders Addn.; KPB File 96-187; Item 1.4. Dawn Glow S/D No. 3, KPB Fle 96-18, subject to staff recommendations. VOTE: The motion passed by unanimous consent. HAMMELMAN BRYSON WH(TMORE-PAINTER BOSCACCI CARPENTER CIUTTS ABSENT YES YES YES YES YES COLEMAN GANNAWAY HENSLEY JOHNSON KNOCK NINE YES YES YES ABSENT YES YES TWO ABSENT KPB PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 23,1996 MEETING PAGE 30 Ut~APPROVFr ~~~1iNli~ES PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION ' ~ ~ Meets Second and Fourth Wednesday - 7:00 p.m. '~ Michael R. Christian 1997 613 Maple Drive Kenai, AK 99611 283-7944 (home) Carl Glick 1998 P.O. Box 528 Kenai, AK 99611 283-7644 (home) 278-1611, ext. 4303 (work) Phil Bryson 1998 P.O. Box 1041 Kenai, AK 99611 283-4428 (home) 283-4672 (work) Teresa Werner-Quade 1999 409 McCollum Drive Kenai, AK 99611 283-5423 (home) Karen J. Mahurin 1999 1 P.O. Box 1073 Kenai, AK 99611 283-4697 (home) 283-4826 (work) Ron Goecke 1999 P.O. Box 3474 Kenai, AK 99611 283-9436 (home) 283-7070 (work) Barbara A. Nord 1997 690 Sycamore Kenai, AK 99611 283-9678 (home) 262-3958 (work) Ad Hoc: Hal Smalley 105 Linwood Lane Kenai, AK 99611 Telephone: 283-7469 (home) 283-5177 (work) (10/1/96) City of Kenai, 210 Fidalgo, Suite 200, Kenai, AK 99611-7794 FaX To: Peninsula Clarion (Attn: Sue) From: Marilyn Kebschull Fax: 907-283-3299 Pages: (Two) Phone: 907-283-7551 Date: September 25, 1996 Re: PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CC: File ^ Ur+gent ^ For Review ^ Please Comment X Please Reply ^ Please Recycle Sue: I would like to run the following announcement on October 2 and October 4, 1996, under "Legal Notice." Please call me as soon as possible with a quote and will issue a purchase order. Thanks. September 25, 1996 CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 210 FIDALGO STREET, SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 http://www.Kenai.net/city PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The City of Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission will hold the following public hearings on October 9, 1996 at 7 p.m.: 1. An application for a Variance Permit for a Variance to encroach into the side yard setback 4.5 feet for the property described as Lot 8, Block 4, V.I.P. Ranch Estates (825 Baleen Avenue), Kenai, Alaska. (Resolution PZ96-64) The Meeting will commence at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. Anyone wishing to present testimony concerning these items should do so at ,the hearings or submit written comments to the City of Kenai, Planning Department, 210 Fidalgo, Suite 200 Kenai Alaska 99611-7794 prior to October 9th. For more information please contact the Planning Department at 283- 7933. Publish: October 2"d and 4th , 1996. ~ Page 2 000'x. _ $3,000.00, 7713- ,3,.::.:~,~~.,k,~. f ~$ iane_s . -1946 PA-12 > tail and gear, flsps...150 ~R` is, x25,000: 778.. 5 572:.. •.=;~ re46 PA-11 HP, mid- time, metal spars, Ira ° tires and skis. ,000:00. 260-4812 issue sage. ~~ ^~, : t;.k~.: °a,-s,T FLIGHT TRAINING! ; . rument and commarciaf ses. Alaska Student loans table. ALASKA FLYING WORK 283-5700. ~~- EDO200 FLOATS. ~ ~ - ut. ~ ftKiggs. Asking 500.00 283-3869 or 252- 1 ~"6'??..s f = ,: - FLOATS fD01320 .. Cub rigging. Great shape., 00.262- 4 5~~ `~- -TAIL DRAGGER , - ~ C-150G, 1901 SMOH, STOH, SCOTT T/W. Man- 'laps, 850x6's, encoder, ~, June annual, x17,700. ?62-3916. Snowmachinss- ....~. >..._,.~...__r '~a~-,~ . x6ooo0. n6.5116. ~ z 1860 PANTERA - : - season on 500 motor., dutch, new Garb, 121X16:: x1,000.00.262-3108 19rm COUGAR ~ rr•~ ~ 500 fan cooled e. Garbs, jets plus: 6, .xcellent shape 0. obo 262-8354 : - 1986 INDY 400E . ` at clutch, new pistons. good. x1,500,00 060. 388.- -~ ;8 YAMAHA OVATION 'c, 3,655 miles. x1,000: 582 - _- B8 YAMAHA PHAZER • long track with cover hop manual. x1,600. obo 315 $3,500.262-7831~ar ,~.-•- :.= -' 1894 VMAX .- 600 st, bw mites, hand and -thumb warmers; .with cover. $5.000 OBO:, Call .daytime 283-4843, after 5pm 283-5479. 1994 XLT SPECIAL M10 suspension, SLP skis, skid plate, many extras; ex- cellent condition. x5500. 262- 9680 ~ ~,~,. ~ ~, _ _ , . 1993 POLARIS 500 - E.F.1. SKS x3,000:.Radk Dover ski skins. 283-9537----- 1994 ARCTiC.CAT 580 EXT . EFI M/C, new shocks, wave track, very dean. $4.000. obo 262-0646.:~t ~. RUBES ~~ -~- 14' SMOKER CRAFT ~arir. rw~ Gavin vV1R1 eX- 1967 FORD tras: Surveyed. x18,500.00 Cab-0ver trailer toter, new en- Alaskan model, no motor or askirxJ s15~500.Op. 262-4758._, give, needs transmission, 2 trader. x1'200' obo 262'5315 188128' BAYUNER speed rear-end. x1,500.. obo 15' BOSTON WHALER Explorer. Volvo Penta. New + 262.1573 Joe,." ~ - - 70 hp Evinrude. $3,000. obo engine, nice condition, all 1972 HOUGH - 262 2678 electronics. Economical to 80-6 Loader. 3 1/2yd. 262- 16' ACHILLES RAFT run. x17,000.00.7713-8048, . 5394 ,., - - :.. Complete with rowing platform. 1962 46' HATTERAS 1978 FREIGHT LINER ~~ ~ oars, excellent condition, • Stro~sher, twin diesel, gen- 92T Detroit, 13 speed $9,800. ~~ duty 2 ton trailer built 5/ orator, stabtiizers, enclosed obo 262-1573 Joe.- '- t -;.-- ~• ~'~• obo 262-9439 fly-bridge full electronics, ex- BACKHOE- CASE 580D 16' WIWE DRIFT BOAT k:etierrt condition. Current Sur- - Less than 2,500- total hours. Trailer, with new paint. vey. $252,000,00, Dave; 907- Good condition. x19,000:00, ~~~~~~ 260-3438. 747-8100, 907-747-6432. 235-1239. °, +- D-6 CAT _ ~2~Le8a~Not r • Hydraulic Hyster winch, pony - ~~`'•~ stag x4,000.262-7874. ~ ~... - - - - - . ~ -'~_ - - ~ ~ - .r~ ~ 1 ~ ~c ` ': 210 Fida~ Strsst, Suld~ By Leigh Rubin 1 --- Kenai, Alaska s9611 r19a--¢~f `~ "`''~'°'~... I I ' " . ' ADVERTISEMENT FOR BID'` '' 1 1 The City of Kenai is solidtinpg~bid~s~t~or the followi~lg: _ ~ I I ~ xrr' Warm Storage Butlinp NQ~ 1; a ; ., I _ I .,~.- ~.~ ovemead Door aepfaeen,rrr _.~;., Bids NnN be received until 10:00 a-rn., local lime, October 1 i 10, 1996 at the above address..... ~-, = 1 1 Bids should be delivered In a sealed envelope addressed I I to the Building Official. City of Kenai, 210 Fldalgo Street, Suite I 1300, Kenai, Alaska 99611-7794..:. . 1 Please contact the Building Offical at (907) 283-7535 or ~ 1 the above address for additional information, -:- - :._, :, ~ ~1:: 1 P~B~SH:9r'25,,M02,,998 -:z- _ .:_--~~ ~----------------- 36aant~~ _ 1 ..~ ~v CITY OF KENAI. ~- .. - . , w ,, . ~; 1 I , ` PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 1 ~- I 210 FlDALGO STREET, SU~i'E 200 _' I .: - I .. ~ KENAI, ALASKA 99611-71-94 . - '' °- 1 httpa/www.Kena '~ ' I A ,, 1 = PUBLIC HEART 0~17f,'E°-#~~ _ "` The City of Kenai Planning S Zoning Corrrrdssion wiU hold the I following public hearings on October 9,1998 at 7 p.m. _ I 1. An application for a"variance P~ for a variarK:e to I- ~" I _ encroach into the side yard setback 4S feet for the prop-,1 1 arty described as Lot 8. Bkxtic 4. V.LP. Ranch Estates (825 1 ..: - 1 Baleen Avenue). Kenai. Alaska. (Resolution PZ96.64). . I The meeting vriB oommerxre at 7:00 pm. in the City HaA I." Coundl Chambers. Anyone wishing to present testlmony core 1 I coming these items should do so at the hearings or submit I i written comments to the City of Kenai, Planning Department, I 1 210 Fdalgo, Suite 200 Kenai Alaska 99811-7794 prior to 1-, 1 October 9th: For more information please contact the 1 - --,. _, ._, gg 7933. .. s~ ::;~. `fix .° -- ~ LPUBLISH~O/02„04 1896 ~. - .: ~~ 36491211 1 } -. "` - . .-~: f ==------------------~ r Intruder ~=~ ~- ,~ ~ ~ __-~=- _~ .:, ,_ . ~_ ~ ~' _.- - '~ '~ ----------~-- t^~ .rR _- ... ~"';°., .....tiff..; _ , r` ~. _. ' _ . _ ~ 's' NOTICE BY THE ALASKA PUBLIC UTILITIES , `~` - re on vacation . Pal ea s e - ~ ~ ~ IIAISSION OF PROPOSED REGULATORY COST ` I ~' ,,~ -_ - ~ . --- - --. CHARGE RATES FOR REGULATED UTILIRIES AND :. I - , `: I ~. ~~ --'" PIPELINE CARRIERS ~;,_ I : >~ e yourself at ~"-home ~f you . Nom - 8 omethln ~ ~ g you 1 Ike , take 1 s gnren that the ALASKA PUBUCUTILITIES COM- 1 I MISSION. in akxondance with regrtiremerrts of As 4z.05254, I As 42.06,286, and 3 AAC 47.010.47.999, proposes to estab. Ob ~. em . - - lish Regulabry Cost Charge (RCC) levels for regulated utifi- 1 ties and pipeline carriers for fiscal year 1997 (FY97). 1 ~ --. , ~ . - I By this notice the Commission Proposes to krontinue FY97 I I RCC rates at the same levels as last f~Cal.year for regulated 1 .: ~ . im Family _ 1 utllWes and pipeline caniere. The rates .are x0.000322 per 1 i kwh for regulated electric utlfities and 0.582 percer-t of adjust= I ed gross regulated operating reverwe for afi other regulated 1 udiities and pipeline carriers. Copies of the detatled calculatbn 1 °-- I t have to tape a welcome note to the supporting these rates maybe obtained from the Commission I ~_ ~ ate; g Wei Si>dh A"~~e• S`~ts 4°°,'~,°reg~'~"~ 1 ` y 1 you go away. There are signs the in- 1 The fdkwring oranges in RCC participation have occurred 1 : >¢ 1 m the past year. 1) the Commission approved transfer of cer ~ : - i ablock away. Signs like newsnna ors r ~ 1 tificate number 425 from Pilot Pohrt Village Coundl to the City - of Pilot Pdnt and exempted the ~ a PBot Pant from eco- 1 ~ n mic regulation and thereb fro th RC _ __t_ _ ' ~ .,~. - - - _ i o y m e C on Jane 19.1998: - t tte roatys just haven't seemed quite as safe silos the speed limits increased." '~ .~ 1 Memorandum Date: October 4, 1996 To: Planning & Zoning Commissioners From: Marilyn Kebschull, Administrative Assistant RE: DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLANS Please bring your copies of the Draft Comprehensive Plan to the meeting on October 9"'. The changes that resulted from the joint work session will be inserted into your binders and then they will be rgturned to you. Council will introduce an Ordinance to adopt the revised Comprehensive Plan on October 16~'.