Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-09-25 p&z packet::, CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION **AGENDA** Council Chambers, 210 Fidalgo September 25, 1996, 7:00 p.m. http://www.Kenai.net/city 1. ROLL CALL: 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: September 11, 1996 September 16, 1996 (Information Only) 4. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD: 5. CONSIDERATION OF PLATS: a. PZ96-63-Mission Estates Preliminary Plat 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. PZ96-61-Encroachment Permit-Side Yard Setbacks (Bowlin)-Lot 4, Block 1, Inlet View Subdivision (425 Rogers Road) b. PZ96-62-Variance-Single Family Dwelling on a Collector Street in a General Commercial Zone (Schoolcraft), Lot 14, Block 2, Thompson Park Subdivision (265 Fireweed) 7. NEW BUSINESS: 8. OLD BUSINESS: 9. CODE ENFORCEMENT ITEMS: 10. REPORTS: a. City Council b. Borough Planning c. Administration 11. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED: 12. INFORMATION ITEMS: a. Public Hearing Notice dated 9/16/96 b. Administrative Approval Strawberry Fields Forever SD c. Memo regarding changes to zoning maps dated 9/19/96 d. Planning & Zoning Commission Roster e. Appointment Letter to Barbara Nord (9/19/96) 13. COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS: 14. ADJOURNMENT: CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION **AGENDA** Council Chambers, 210 Fidalgo September 11, 1996, 7:00 p.m. 1. ROLL CALL: 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 28, 1996 4. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD: 5. CONSIDERATION OF PLATS: a. PZ96-56-Ridgeview Estates Addition No. 1 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. PZ96-58-Encroachment Permit-Front Yard Setbacks (Zimco)-Lot 10, Block 7, Inlet View Subdivision, Third Addition, Part 2 b. PZ96-59-Conditional Use Permit-Nightly Rental of Apartment (Craig), Lot 1, Block 6, Redoubt Terrace Subdivision 7. NEW BUSINESS: a. PZ96-60-Landscape Site Plan Review-Tract 4-B-4 (Pad "C"), Cook Inlet Industrial Air Park Subdivision 8. OLD BUSINESS: 9. CODE ENFORCEMENT ITEMS: 10. REPORTS: a. City Council b. Borough Planning c. Administration 11. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED: 12. INFORMATION ITEMS: a. Joint Work Session Notice-September 16, 1996 at 7 p.m. b. Notice of Borough Planning Commission Action of August 26, 1996 c. Copy of letter sent to Kevin Walker d. Start of Review-Cook Inlet 246-City of Kenai Corps of Engineers Permit Information 13. COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS: 14. ADJOURNMENT: CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION September 11, 1996 **MINUTES** 1. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Teresa Werner-Quade, Michael Christian, Carl Glick, Phil Bryson, Ron Goecke Members Absent: Karen Mahurin, John Booth Others Present: Councilman Hal Smalley, City Engineer Jack La Shot, Administrative Assistant Marilyn Kebschull 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: Goecke noted the need to change a word under 6a, noting it should be front yard setback instead of side yard. GOECKE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF AGENDA WITH NOTED CHANGE AND ASKED FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT. BRYSON SECONDED MOTION. AGENDA APPROVED. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: August 28, 1996 WERNER-QUADE MOVED FOR APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF AUGUST 28 AND ASKED FOR UNANIMOUS CONSENT. GOECKE SECOND MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. 4. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD: 5. CONSIDERATION OF PLATS: a. PZ96-56-Ridgeview Estates Addition No. 1 WERNER-QUADE MOVED FOR APPROVAL OF PZ96-56. MOTION SECONDED BY GOECKE. Chairman Glick noted that although this was not a public hearing he would accept public testimony. Megan O'Neill , 5450 King Salmon Drive. O'Neill stated they live next to the lot they are speaking about and maintain the road. O'Neill stated the road needs to be Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 Minutes September 11, 1996 updated if anybody else is going to be living there. When it is plowed sometimes and there is too much snow, they have to bring in front end loaders. It requires four wheel drive a few weeks out of the year. O'Neill stated she felt that if anybody is looking to have more than one or two houses if they will be building in that area, they need to upgrade the road. O'Neill added that this is the requirement of the land below them. Glick asked O'Neill which street they lived on and was advised King Salmon Drive. O'Neill stated they road they are talking about upgrading is their driveway. Bryson asked which of the easements or streets that appear on the plat itself, which is developed? La Shot stated King Salmon Drive. Bryson noted that King Salmon Drive and Chisik are shown. La Shot stated Chisik Street is a city maintained street and added that King Salmon Drive contains a driveway to O'Neill's house which is on Lot 1 of Reidel Subdivision. O'Neill noted that it is basically a driveway and two cars couldn't use it at the same time. Bryson noted the property is not dedicating any ROW with action; they are splitting a lot without dedication of ROW. Bryson stated he would assume that the city doesn't require a road agreement on this. La Shot stated we do, and it doesn't necessary have to involve ROW dedication. La Shot offered the following history: When lots 1 and 2 of Reidel SD was platted, the entire 60 feet of King Salmon Drive was dedicated at that time from the Reidel property. Reidel wanted to subdivide off Lot 1 so he could sell it. The city did allow that without install agreement; however a note was placed on plat that further resubdivision of Lot 2 would require an installation agreement. Now, across the street four lots are being formed which would enter the ROW dedicated by Reidel. It appears appropriate that they should be required to join into an installation agreement. Bryson asked who? La Shot stated the owners of the property that this is platting. Bryson asked which tract dedicated the right of way. La Shot stated it was dedicated by the Reidels. Bryson commented that they committed another property to an installation agreement. La Shot stated Reidel on the other side of the street dedicated a full ROW. Normally, they would dedicate half. La Shot noted that any further resubdivision of that property would require construction or half construction of the street. Chairman Glick asked if additional questions of Ms. O'Neill. None noted. Glick asked La Shot if he had additional comments. La Shot stated nothing but that he does recommend the installation agreement. Christian asked if there is anything proposed along Lot 5 adding that he sees lines on the plat. La Shot stated this plat will dedicate a half a right of way to match the existing half adding that is the normal procedure. Christian asked when you say that Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 3 September 11, 1996 they need to get into this installation agreement, what are you saying. La Shot explained it means to improve the road. Bryson asked if we were done with public testimony. Glick asked if anyone had additional comments. None noted. Bryson noted that apparently the Rex Eagle homestead dedicated a 30 foot right of way. La Shot confirmed this. Bryson stated he wondered why they were being allowed to dedicate a 30 foot easement rather than a full dedication. La Shot noted that normally half a dedication is the way it is normally done. Then, when the property subdivides across the street, they dedicate the other half. Bryson noted they are proposing a ROW easement, not a ROW period. La Shot stated he is not sure whey they called it an easement. Bryson noted they retain use of that property. La Shot stated he is not as worried about that one due to the flag configuration. It may be appropriate to say further resubdivision of Lot 5 would require an installation agreement for M Street properties. Bryson questioned if the Rex Eagle property was outside the city limits asking if the limits are right on that line. La Shot stated yes and that further complicates it. At this time there is no street in there. Goecke asked what happens with this subdivision now and the installation agreement is that the developer on this plat must bring King Salmon Drive up to code even though it is on the Reidel property. La Shot stated that was right noting it was in a right of way. Bryson asked if the parent property of this addition number one was part of the Reidel property noting it is in the same quarter section. Bryson asked what created this quarter section? Was it transfered from the state? La Shot read the legal description adding it is all one property and he doesn't know where it came from. Christian asked when we are going through and we require installation agreement. Do we hold off approval until they do this or do we approve it and they are expected to do it. La Shot explained it is approved with the stipulation that there be an installation agreement. The borough will not file the plat until the installation is completed or there is an agreement. Bryson stating he didn't know where the city boundary is other than it lies on the solid line at the bottom of the plat. Bryson questioned if on the right hand side is also in city limits, between unsubdivided and Ridgeview Addition. La Shot stated he thinks the property line is on the north boundary. (The group took time for Ms. O'Neill and La Shot to look at maps.) La Shot advised that city limits run along the south and the east boundaries of this plat. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 4 September 11, 1996 Bryson stated he is uncomfortable with a nondedication of a 30 foot right of way on the north adding he doesn't know the access problem on the east. Bryson stated that particularly with the 30 foot ROW existing south of this property, it would seem appropriate to dedicate that 30 foot easement particularly since they are breaking this into a lot situation. Goecke commented making it a dedicated 30 foot ROW instead of an easement. Bryson stated that is what he felt was appropriate adding that the borough may comment on it. La Shot stated they may have done that to try to avoid an installation agreement. La Shot added that the surveyor had indicated they didn't plan to get into that with the city since they weren't dedicating on King Salmon Drive. La Shot noted his recommendation is to have an installation agreement. La Shot noted he is not worried about the M Street right of way because of the large Lot 5 configuration. They could enter from Chisik and if they further resubdivide La Shot noted at that time he would recommend an installation agreement. Goecke commented that he thinks it would be cleaner if we required the 30 foot ROW dedicated now and have it over with on the south side. Goecke stated if he is breaking it up, there is a chance he will continue and will just have to come back. La Shot stated that at that time we can require street construction on M Street. Goecke stated he would rather see the ROW on the south side of Lot. 5 a dedicated ROW rather than ROW easement. Bryson asked if they were to come in for a building permit on Lot 5, would their setback have to consist of 25 feet from the ROW edge or from the property line. La Shot stated from the end of the ROW. Bryson clarified from the ROW easement. La Shot stated they would take the easement line as the beginning point for the setback. VOTE: BRYSON YES GOECKE YES GLICK YES WERNER-QUADE YES CHRISTIAN YES MOTION PASSED. 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. PZ96-60-Encroachment Permit-Fron Inlet View Subdivision, Third Addition, t Yard Setbacks (Zimco)-Lot 10, Block 7, Part 2 GOECKE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL PZ96-60, AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT FOR A FRONT YARD SETBACK ON LOT 10, BLOCK 7, INLET VIEW SUBDIVISION. MOTION SECONDED BY CHRISTIAN. PUBLIC HEARING OPENED. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 5 Minutes September 1 1, 1996 PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED. Glick additional staff comments. La Shot stated nothing additional adding that they did obtain a variance to encroach in the rear yard previously. When they finished the house, found they were encroaching in the front yard. Had they moved house back one foot, for example, they would have been okay. La Shot stated he thinks they tried to give a little more rear yard to the house. Smalley asked Chairman Glick if it would be appropriate to ask a question of La Shot. Glick advised yes. Smalley asked what would prevent these encroachment requests in the future asking if there is something that the city can do to prevent these from occurring. La Shot stated he thought the closest thing would be to require that the house corners be staked in the field by surveyor. Now they are required to submit a plot plan from a certified surveyor and an asbuilt but it doesn't require them to physically stake the corners. Smalley asked if we had any idea of the cost to have those stakes done to identify the corners? La Shot estimated from $100 to $200. Smalley commented if an encroachment isn't granted, there is a cloud on a house and it can't be financed. Mark Zimmerman, Route HC, Box 755, Soldotna-Zimmerman explained he was the one who did it. Zimmerman stated he had gotten the permit explaining it was a tight lot and tried to maximize it. Zimmerman stated they could have gotten the house on the lot okay but would have had to have turned it and wouldn't look right with the other houses which are square with the street. Zimmerman explained they got permit to straighten the house with the street. Zimmerman noted they had the lot surveyed because it was so tight. When the concrete subcontractor came out Zimmerman noted they had a discussion about getting right and was assured it was right. Zimmerman stated they set the footings and laid the block. Zimmerman stated he checked it and the house ended up being turned a little, didn't go into the back as far as first thought. Zimmerman explained that there is a bedroom that sticks out on the front and when he checked the left hand corner it was okay, the right hand corner was 6 inches over the line. The house ended up with a little twist that put that bedroom over. Zimmerman explained they were trying to get it too tight. Zimmerman noted he could have just pushed the house back because he had permission to do that but were trying to get it right and missed. Zimmerman offered this as a point of explanation and added they did survey the lot because of the tightness of the house. Bryson commented that this, to him, is a typical situation. They attempted to do it right, followed rules on book, and at some point something relatively minor occurs. Bryson noted he thinks this is the appropriate use of this type of approval, after the fact and it is acknowledged at this time. Bryson stated he thinks this is the purpose of the ordinance rather than a violation. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 6 September 11, 1996 Goecke asked Chairman Glick if it would be appropriate to ask Mr. Zimmerman a question. Glick advised yes. Goecke asked Mr. Zimmerman if in his estimation with what they were talking about earlier with requiring the corners to be staked, would that additional cost be a detriment to you as a builder. Goecke added that we all know that would be passed on. In your case, if the city had required you to have your surveyor stake the corners of the house to make sure you are within the setbacks, would that $100 more. Zimmerman stated he has never heard of a surveyor staking corners of a house. Smalley commented he thought it was property corners. Bryson stated they are talking about putting about references for corners of the house. Zimmerman stated when they know it is going to be this tight adding they had to do the preliminary and that was why he had the surveyor locate the lot corners. Zimmerman commented that in some cases it might not be a bad idea adding that in some cases you cannot always find those corners. Zimmerman commented that if he hadn't surveyed it he might have been two feet off. Goecke stated his question was if had the city required the surveyor to stake the corners of the house prior to digging, and this costs from $100 to $200, would that cost extra to pay surveyor be a detriment to the sale of that house? Zimmerman responded it wouldn't but you have to dig afterwards and it is hard to keep the stakes there for the house. Zimmerman added that if you string the corners from the lot, you can measure off the strings. Zimmerman explained how the excavation makes it difficult to maintain the stakes. Zimmerman explained that he had gone back and checked and the left corner of the bedroom and it was okay but it was the right corner that was over. Zimmerman added you cannot keep stakes on the corners during construction. Zimmerman commented that he thinks when doing a certified plot plan, in some cases it wouldn't be a bad idea to say you need to survey this. VOTE: WERNER-QUADE YES GOECKE YES CHRISTIAN YES BRYSON YES GLICK YES MOTION PASSED. b. PZ96-59-Conditional Use Permit-Nightly Rental of Apartment (Craig), Lot 1, Block 6, Redoubt Terrace Subdivision BRYSON MOVED TO APPROVE PZ96-59. MOTION SECONDED BY WERNER- QUADE. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 7 Minutes September 11, 1996 PUBLIC HEARING OPENED. Jim White, 1509 Toyon Way-White explained his property is three lots away from this property. White questioned if a guide could come in and rent this and have fish fries every night, people drinking beers, and rattling coolers and throwing them in the boat at 5 a.m. Could that happen? White noted this is not a bed and breakfast if the owner doesn't live there. Instead more like a Comfort Inn where you rent a room and get a continental breakfast. La Shot noted the applicant indicated daily rental with breakfast service and/or dinner and didn't indicate if the owners would live there or not. White commented that next to his property there are two empty lots and asked what would keep someone from building another motel there? White asked if that could happen or would they have to go through someone. La Shot asked Glick if he wanted him to answer these questions. La Shot stated this Conditional Use Permit is specific to this property. If any other lots around it wanted to do something similar, they would have to go through the same process. White asked if it would it be easier since the precedent was set. La Shot agreed it may set some precedent. White stated that based on that this, he would be opposed to this separation of commercial versus residential properties. White stated that this is a nice property, expensive property on the bluff and wouldn't want to see my property damaged as by what I see as a motel. DeWayne Craig-Listed residence as Vancouver, Washington at present. Craig stated that when talking about how to fill out the application when talking to people upstairs they indicated that a bed and breakfast specifically designed for residential house. Craig stated that what he wants to do is operate a bed and breakfast adding he would live there and take all the pride that someone would take in their own home. Craig stated he feels he has demonstrated that over the years. Craig. noted he has won a beautification award, put steps in to the beach, put bench there, planted the beach grass along the walkway, and planted the trees. Craig stated he feels he has shown pride and ownership. The concern about the lots next door that are vacant next to Dr. Bailie is specifically zoned in the covenants for single family. Craig stated his lot was specifically zoned for apartments adding the whole street all zoned for apartments and that there aren't any residents there on Forest Drive. Craig stated that right now the way it is being rented someone could have a beer party and it could last all night. Adding there is nothing keeping it from happening. Craig commented that he felt with a bed and breakfast situation there would be a lot more control as you would be living there and could evict them on the spot. In an apartment it takes weeks sometimes to Planning & Zoning Commission Page 8 Minutes September 1 1, 1996 get somebody out of apartment. Craig commented that the apartment, the next one up street the gray one, was used by Louie for a couple summers as a nightly rental noting this was the overflow from Louies. Craig noted there has been some precedence set. Craig noted he wouldn't want to use it as an overflow but wanted to use it as a bed and breakfast. Christian asked Craig if his intention is to live in it. Craig stated absolutely. Craig noted he has been living outside, has grand kids here, and has been trying to figure out a way to come back four or five months in the summer. Christian asked what Craig's plan was for the other months? Craig stated it will be either vacant or as it always has been, rented as an apartment. PUBLIC H EARING CLOSED. Glick asked if there was an additional staff report. La Shot noted if the commission would like the owner to occupy the building when they rent it by the night, they should make a specific motion. La Shot noted this was not noted in either the application or the staff report. Chairman Glick drew attention to the items handed out tonight relating to this item. La Shot asked if there were any questions on handout. Werner-Quade asked if this handout 6b is in regard to this particular rental application? La Shot stated yes. Werner-Quade asked what the intent was and if it was to point out the regulations? La Shot noted the one memo is from the Kornelis'. Werner-Quade asked if that is the Public Works Director. La Shot stated yes and that he is attempting to show that this is a use not shown in the land use table. The other item is to show things that were done to allow uses that were not listed in the land use table. La Shot stated he thinks memo from Kornelis was submitted as a citizen. Werner- Quade asked if it is in opposition. L a Shot stated it appears to be. Werner-Quade concurred with that. Werner-Quade stated she would like to note this is an apartment and is not four separate cabins. Goecke noted he got as much as ever of calls from people in that neighborhood from people complaining although noted there is not one here tonight. Goecke noted it may be because he knows some of the people who live over there. Goecke stated they were not real happy when they got this letter and called. Goecke noted he has a problem with it adding he doesn't think that that neighborhood was ever thought to be designed for a nightly thing. This is not a commercial zone. Goecke stated he thinks that is the way it should be and think it should be left that way. Goecke stated that nightly rentals, to me, are a little more on the commercial side. Goecke noted that because of this he will be voting against this. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 9 Minutes September 1 1, 1996 Christian asked if Mr. La Shot indicated that if we wanted to make a specification that we do it in a motion. Glick confirmed this. CHRISTIAN MOVED THAT THIS B&B BE OWNER OCCUPIED AT THE TIME THAT IT IS USED AS A DAILY RENTAL. AND, AT ANY SITUATION THAT HE IS NO LONGER IN RESIDENCE THAT THE CUP BE WITHDRAWN. MOTION DIES FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Bryson stated the conditional use permit applicaton does not state that it is requested to be used as a bed and breakfast. Bryson stated he didn't see where he uses that word. So, presumably we cannot approve it on that basis. La Shot stated the reason the CUP was used because of them being apartments and the square footage being used would exceed that allowed for bed and breakfast. If you put a stipulation that the owner did occupy it during times of nightly rental it may amount to the same thing without it really having the definition of a bed and breakfast. Smalley stated that he thinks a number of years ago when serving on P&Z there was a situation in VIP where a four plex that came to the same procedures. Smalley stated he thought this was right about the time that approved of B&B ordinance. This was an apartment complex that the owner lived in one of the units and the other units were then allowed to be used as B&B's, like La Shot was saying. Smalley noted so there is precedence on record. Smalley stated with Christian's motion that failed a concern that when it is not owner occupied that the CUP be completely gone which means he would have to apply again. There is a precedence in the city where conditional use for B&B's of such are on record in residential areas. Werner-Quade stated she did not have trouble with the amendment until if Mr. Craig isn't there then CUP would be revoked. Werner-Quade asked what if he had to go out of town suddenly for an emergency, what if he has a daughter or someone else who could oversee the B&B. Werner-Quade stated that is why she couldn't support the amendment even though supporting the basics and think someone should be there. Werner-Quade stated she would want that to be Craig but if someone should check and you are out of town the permit revoked. Bryson stated concerning the staff reference to difference general conditions how this proposed use affects the neighborhood and the area. Bryson stated he doesn't feel that the access problem where it might increase traffic is valid. Presumably the units are already created so the traffic count wouldn't modify that much. Bryson noted Forest Drive is the same width development on the north end of Redoubt Terrace as on the south. Virtually half the subdivision uses the north end and only Toyon Way uses the south end. Bryson stated he feels the infrastructure is adequate. As far as the affect on neighbors, I would think it would have an affect. Bryson stated you get into a situation Planning & Zoning Commission Page 10 Minutes September 11, 1996. that could the lot next to it justify the same use because their neighbors have that and at that point, where do you stop. Christian stated he agrees that there is so much traffic on Forest that he doesn't see much increase in traffic there. There seems to be adequate parking for numerous units. Craig noted that for the first year he just planned on renting one or two units. Christian stated it doesn't seem it will be that large a burden because Forest Drive is a very active street. Christian stated he would think impact would be minimal. Christian stated he would like to see something in there that would identify this as a bed and breakfast which says the owner would occupy building when it is used as a bed and breakfast. Christian noted he would like to make a proposal that would keep this from being rescinded as soon as he leaves. CHRISTIAN MOVE THAT THIS CUP WOULD BE WRITTEN AS A BED & BREAKFAST UNDER THE STIPULATIONS ALREADY IN THE CODE FOR B&B AND THAT ON A LONG TERM BASIS WHEN THE OWNER IS NO LONGER OCCUPYING THE BUILDING THAT THE USE AS A BED & BREAKFAST BE TAKEN AWAY EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENLY. BRYSON SECOND THE MOTION. Smalley noted he caught one thing when talking about the stipulations in the code in reference to bed and breakfast, it gives a specific square footage in a home. The precedence that has been set in apartment is larger than that 30 percent figure. Do you want to leave it at that 30 percent or make it a similar situation where it is more than the 30 percent. Smalley noted he believed the one in VIP is three of the four apartment units were rentals. Christian stated he has a problem if we go with the 30 percent either this owner or a subsequent owner could subdivide into numerous rooms that could make it into 8 or 12 units and noted he wouldn't like to see that either. Smalley stated the amendment could speak to the number of apartments that would be allowed for B&B in the facility. Werner-Quade asked for clarification of how many units there were and that the owner intends to occupy one. That would leave three units available for the nightly rental. Werner-Quade stated if amendment was changed to state that the owner would occupy one of the existing four units leaving three available for nightly rentals that would be an amendment she could support. Christian stated he would change amendment. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 1 1 Minutes September 1 1, 1996 AMEND AMENDMENT TO SAY THAT THE OWNER WOULD OCCUPY ONE OF THE FOUR APARTMENTS DURING OPERTION AS A BED & BREAKFAST WHILE THE OTHER THREE ARE RENTED ON A NIGHTLY BASIS. TAKE OUT THE CODE PART AND SAY THAT AS LONG AS THE OWNER OCCUPIES ONE OF THE FOUR APARTMENTS WHEN USED ON A NIGHTLY BASIS. BRYSON CONCURRED WITH MODIFICATION. VOTE AMENDMENT: GOECKE BRYSON GLICK AMENDMENT PASSED. VOTE ON MAIN: CHRISTIAN WERNER-QUADE GLICK MOTION FAILED. YES CHRISTIAN YES YES WERNER-QUADE YES YES YES BRYSON NO YES GOECKE NO NO Chairman Glick informed Mr. Craig of his right to appeal the decision. 7. NEW BUSINESS: a. PZ96-57-Landscape Site Plan Review-Tract 4-B-4 (Pad "C"), Cook Inlet Industrial Air Park Subdivision GOECKE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PZ96-60, LANDSCAPE/SITE PLAN REVIEW, PAD C, COOK INLET INDUSTRIAL AIR PARK. MOTION SECONDED BY CHRISTIAN. Glick asked if there was anything additional to the staff report. La Shot noted nothing as long as everyone understands that this is one of the small pads in front of Carrs. Bryson went on record as abstaining from discussing or voting on this as working on other phases of this. Christian asked if we are talking about the first pad on left or the second. La Shot stated the first pad as going east from the intersection past Dairy Queen. Christian asked if he understands this and that they will have a fence facing Spur Highway, a wooden gate to match fence. Christian stated he is wondering what fence adding it says a 6 foot high cedar fence and that is what will be facing the Spur Highway. La Shot stated it is hard to see but looks like a short piece of fence. Christian asked if it is to Planning & Zoning Commission Page 12 Minutes September 1 1, 1996 hide trash bins. Christian noted we are not being told what retail business will be in this. La Shot stated he didn't think it was a secret adding he thinks this is a pizza/video place. Christian stated the entrance is by way of the two parking lots on the side? La Shot stated he believes so. Christian added that the front that faces Carrs does not have entrances. La Shot stated he couldn't say for sure from looking at this. Christian stated his worry is that as we are driving through town and looking at the back end of a building adding he would object to that. Christian stated he would like to see the finished building. Christian stated it looks like it will be facing Carrs and all the landscaping on the side facing Carrs. Christian stated he realizes there is existing landscaping on the road side. Christian stated it doesn't give us as much information as I would like to have. Christian asked if it is possible Bryson could explain more. Bryson stated he was not familiar adding that his firm is doing the water and sewer. Goecke stated he is of the same opinion as Christian. Goecke stated he has a hard time with putting the fenced in dumpster and loading dock on the Spur Highway adding that he understands what the developer is wanting to do. The developer has the whole parcel and he is wanting it to be an all inclusive thing. Goecke stated that as long as the entrances are on the side, he would think that this would be better served if that building was turned 180 and that dumpster was next to a parking lot not out to the street. Goecke stated he was wondering adding that maybe it shouldn't even be brought up but asking the developer about that (noted he wasn't here). Goecke stated he would like to either personally or have someone ask him his intent. Goecke noted that consequently this would mean putting this on hold. Glick asked Goecke if he would like to make a motion to table to the next meeting. GOECKE MOVED TO TABLE RES PZ96-60 UNTIL NEXT MEETING OR UNTIL WE CAN ACQUIRE MORE INFORMATION FROM THE DEVELOPER WITH INFORMATION AS TO HIS CRITERIA FOR PUTTING THE BACK SIDE TO THE HIGHWAY. MOTION SECONDED BY CHRISTIAN. Werner-Quade questioned if under New Business 7a was it changed as on agenda it says 96-57 and questioned if it should be it 96-60. Kebschull advised it should be 96-60 as noted on the resolution and note the change on the agenda. Glick asked if the Commission was ready to vote to table it to the next meeting. VOTE: BRYSON GOECKE GLICK ABSTAIN WERNER-QUADE YES CHRISTIAN YES YES YES MOTION PASSED. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes 8. OLD BUSINESS: 9. CODE ENFORCEMENT ITEMS: 10. REPORTS: a. City Council Page 1 3 September 1 1, 1996 Smalley advised he didn't arrive at the meeting until the Commission and Committee reports were being given. Smalley noted on the agenda you can see what was passed. Item 2 made arrangements to pay interim city manager just more than the highest paid city employee noting that is right at $7,000 a month. Smalley noted he is responsible for all taxes, etc. He gets no retirement, etc. During the committee reports a number of openings on different commissions were noted and you may have received letters indicating there are other openings. Smalley noted it is not because council thinks you should move on. Primarily other commissioners get it when openings on this Commission because this is a truly working commission. Smalley noted that not that the other commissions aren't but this one meets twice a -month and does more business for the city. Old business, Item 1 and 2, set a meeting for the 16th on the Comprehensive Plan. You will be invited to meeting on Monday. Also information on FY98 capital matching grants programs will be presented beginning at 7 p.m. Top of page three, the Garcia building in Cunningham Park. Smalley noted that clearly the building is on city property. He has been at a stop order on his development and the city is wanting the problem to be remedied. Smalley stated he would suggest that by the evacuation of Mr. Garcia's work. Smalley added he didn't think those words were in the minutes; however, he felt that was the intent. New business, Smalley explained the reason why #4 pulled off, they wanted to deal with it and it was passed. The advertisement item for the new city manager identified publications that would be used for advertising. Those advertisements will go out November 1st with a closure the 15th of December. Smalley explained it has to go into November as some publications have minimum of 30 days pre-notice for advertising. Smalley advised the city will be advertising in journals in lower 48. Smalley listed the publications that will be used. Smalley stated they feel we will get a large number of applications. Already have received one application which was unsolicited. Council is looking at somewhere in January, February, or March being the date to expect a new city manger on line. Council will meet in October to go through expectations, duties, responsibilities of that position. Council is clarifying some of the issues from last time because there was some confusion because it wasn't specific. Council will make a Planning & Zoning Commission Page 14 Minutes September 11, 1996 decision if it will be reviewing the applications and holding interviews or if we will contract with another firm. Last time elected to do it because fees run $18,000 to $20,000 but when hiring someone who is basically. CEO with salary of $100,000 small fee to pay. Inlet Woods subdivision lights put in seven light poles. Item 7, Smalley explained the city is purchasing an evergreen tree and memorial plaque and placing in Leif Hansen Memorial Park for a past councilman and mayor and teacher in the district for many years, Eugene Morin. b. Borough Planning Bryson stated there was a regular meeting last Monday. Prior to the regular meeting a work session on the borough's position considering ADEC's withdrawal from wastewater review in borough. That was the third work session and have one more set. On the regular agenda, Item C, all items approved without change. Item G, vacations not requiring public hearing, request for vacation of utility easement was approved. Special consideration items were all approved. Bryson noted an interesting one is number 5. Jake Ivanoff, prior to the borough selected lands from the state, he had made application to the federal government for a larger piece of property. That was lost by the agency handling it and this is an attempt to settle the claim that Ivanoff has on that property. It has been proposed and he would accept a five acre tract in that area. On plats nine were reviewed. One was tabled pending public hearing. Item J, Kenai River Habitat Protection, an individual proposed construction of a carport at River mile 15.2. The structure he has there was partially damaged by last year's flood. After going through the testimony it was indicated he was proposing to enlarge what he has rather than just rebuild. Action was to deny the request. He still would be allowed to reconstruct what he has there noting he doesn't need a permit for that. Werner-Quade questioned on the Kenai River Habitat, when he asked to expand and the commission denied. What was the reason for the denial. Bryson stated he thinks the sentiment was that the ordinance states that you cannot increase the development in those areas near the bank. Bryson noted he happened to be on the other side of the issue. The meeting before four situations that came up. He showed pictures of the way these subdivisions appear. Bryson stated he assumes it is much the same situation and couldn't conceive any impact than there is there already. Werner-Quade explained her reasons for asking is in case those issues should come to the city adding she knows the fragility of the habitat that may come into play. c. Administration Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes Page 15 September 1 1, 1996 ' Did research on the zoning map and have answers to the industrial arts and Inlet View area, the two other areas Bryson was right about. La Shot asked the Commission to take note of the information items and the joint work session with Council regarding the Comp Plan Update and the Capital Improvements list. Smalley encouraged group to be there for the CIP list as in the past P&Z had been a part of that process. 11. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED: 12. INFORMATION ITEMS: a. .Joint Work Session Notice-September 16, 1996 at 7 p.m. b. Notice of Borough Planning Commission Action of August 26, 1996 c. Copy of letter sent to Kevin Walker d. Start of Review-Cook Inlet 246-City of Kenai Corps of Engineers Permit Information 13. COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS: Christian asked La Shot if he had checked on the Birch Street ditch. La Shot stated it should be fixed soon adding it is a bad bump. 14. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at approximately 8:30 p.m. Res ectfully Submitted: Maril n Kebschull Administrative Assistant KENAI CITY COUNCIL PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION WORK SESSION September 16, 1996 Kenai City Council Chambers Council Present: Williams, Smalley, Measles, Bookey, Moore, Swarner and Bannock. Commission members present: Christian, Geocke, Quade, Bryson and Glick. Staff present: Kebschull, Graves, Ross, Kornelis, Morris, Burnett, DeForest, Elson. Others present: Stan Steadman, Ethel Claussen, Hugh Chumley. Mayor Williams opened the work session at 7:00 p.m. He requested Stan Steadman give a short report regarding activities of the Economic Development District. Steadman Report: Steadman distributed copies of the May, 1996 Progress Report. He informed Council and Commissioners that a few days prior, through Representative Young's office, a $1 million grant was awarded to them. Having the grant will allow them to pay off the debt with the bank and renovate the EDD building for use by the incubator program. EDD projects Steadman reported on were: a. Small Business Assistance Program -- This project was very successful. They issued loans to 14 small businesses in the area. They are also having an analysis done by a person who has had a lot of experience with incubator programs in Kansas. b. Alyeska Alloys Project (bringing iron ore from Chile and interacting with natural gas) -- The project is progressing. A site was chosen in Tyonek and will positively affect the Borough's tax base. c. Volcano Project -- This project is in the developmental stages. d. Shellfish Hatchery -- This project will be operated by EDD for the shellfish group . e. Youth Enterprise Project -This project was very successful and the city was very supportive, involving their Handiworks group with atimber-cruising project for the city. That group then worked for the Salamatof Native Association, who were so impressed with the program, they are planning to integrate it with their summer youth program. KENAI CTTY COUNCII,/PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1996 PAGE 2 f. Port Graham/Study of Pink Salmon -Port Graham submitted an application to Exxon for funding to conduct a study on pink salmon. Because of their tax status, they contracted with EDD and Fish & Game, who subcontracted the work back to Port Graham. g. Ice Rink Study -Mark Whetherstone gave a short review of the Ice Rink Study which was completed by EDD with which he was involved as the RCMD coordinator. They reviewed the draft report of EDD and added information to the report. They were asked to report on economic impacts that would affect the Borough, as well as those from the building of the Nikiski facility. Whetherstone stated he would supply the city with ten additional copies of the report. Williams requested council and P&Z to review the report and add their comments. h. Sakhalin, Russia & Okita, Japan -Steadman explained EDD had been facilitating visits of students, professionals, etc. from these areas to the Kenai/Soldotna area. Steadman stated they were wanting to know if this involvement was to continue or if they should pursue it. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE DISCUSSION: Carl Glick, Chairperson of the Planning & Zoning Commission reported the Commission had worked on the Comprehensive Plan Update for some time and finished their work on it nine months prior. He noted, some of the items discussed in the 1992 update came forward, others had nothing done, i.e. Kenai Spur Highway upgrade (soon to be completed) and the upgrade of pedestrian/bike paths on Forest Drive (not yet begun). Commissioner Bryson reported there were some areas of the update abotu which the Commission had diversely different views. One of the areas was development along the Spur Highway. The upgrade didn't change access to the highway, yet it is a more imposing road. There had been a request to change zoning on two lots (from residential to commercial) across from KCHS, but the residents there were very opposed to allowing commercial development in that area. Bannock also noted the possibility of changing that zoning was a major point of contention. He added, he believed the plan should be a report of where the city came from, but also, what it wants for the future. He believes the Spur corridor should be KENAI CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1996 PAGE 3 commercial, one lot deep with obvious exceptions where there are already residences. He would want to encourage the availability of becoming a commercial zone a good thing. Carl Glick noted the discussion of the library did not include the proposed addition. Swarner noted "wheelchair" was misspelled in that portion of the report. Williams spoke about the tax base and how information regarding economic trends should be used when planning for the future. Geocke noted the reports say there are more jobs in the area, but they are not the kind of jobs that pay wages to sustain increases in the mill rates, etc. Councilman Moore stated the unemployment rate had alarmed him and he would like the city to keep focused on businesses that are not seasonal. Williams stated his concern the population decline had to do with the lack of building lots in Kenai. Bannock stated he would like more information placed at Page 23 in regard to the Spur Highway corridor. Glick noted that on Page 26(a), a statement was included in regard to commercial development "at strategic locations along the Spur Highway..." Bannock stated he thought the statement should be stronger, i.e. not just to "encourage" commercial development. Williams suggested waiting to see how the neighborhood reacts to the Spur Highway upgrade. People may be more interested in development commercial development in that area. Smalley agreed. Smalley discussed the increase in student enrollment at the various area schools and suggested the Kenai Elementary School be renovated to be able to be used as a school again. Those entities now using the school could be moved to the Old Carrs Mall. Other suggested additions to the Plan were: a. Page 28, expound on Marathon Road use (for the ARFF and Challenger Center. Include a copy of the ARFF layout drawing). b. Information regarding the Public Health Nurse space needs. c. New court house should be mentioned, pointing out the building is cit- owned for eight years and at that time it will be turned over to the State. d. Page 52 or 71, information should be included regarding the proposed year-around skating multi-use facility. e. Old Town Park should be included as it was just dedicated and updated through efforts by the Rotary Club and City. Williams also suggested a new park be developed along the green strip between the highway and Lawton Drive. The area could KENAI CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1996 PAGE 4 be made handicap accessible and perhaps the Lions Club could get involved with its development, instead of the park area by the Oilers field, as they previously proposed. f. Page 53 should include information regarding the upgrade of Municipal Park playground and the Park Strip park. Marilyn Kebschull reported the Borough has included $30,000 in their budget each year (for the last two years) to pay for updates to Comprehensive Plans. Last year Soldotna received the funds and this year Homer did. Soldotna hired a consultant to do the update and the update included color maps, etc. She suggested council and Planning & Zoning may want to consider requesting the funding for the next update Kenai does. Williams requested the changes discussed be included in the council packet for review at the October 2, 1996 council meeting. Hugh Chumley -Chumley stated he resides at 309 Princess Lane and felt, as a developer, the council and Commission were giving mixed signals through their discussion during the session. He stated he had tried to change the zoning for two lots in front of his home (along the Spur) to commercial and was turned down due to public outcry. Yet, his residence is in front of where the ARFF will be placed and there seemed to be no concern that it, as a commercial development, could be a concern by himself and other residents along Princess and Magic Lanes. He added, if the Commission was making their decisions by public outcry, he could find developers to state their complaints as well. He did not think the session was giving out a signal to developers that they were encouraging development. Kebschull also asked if council was wanting maps to be updated. If they were, they may not be able to have them available by October 2. Williams requested the changes and ordinance for approval be included in the October 2 agenda for introduction. Along with those items, have a memo informing council of any extension of time that may be needed before ratification in order to have the maps updated. BREAK TAKEN: 8:54 P.M. BACK TO SESSION: 9:05 P.M. KENAI CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1996 PAGE 5 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROTECT LIST DISCUSSION: Williams stated the funding for CIP projects would probably diminished again this year. There was a move afoot to take funding away for Governor's matching grants and go back to the 1/3, 1/3 and 1/3 funding. Also, this year there was a heavily contested senate seat race as well as a new representative in junior standing, which may lessen the city's chances in receiving funding. Williams added, it was unknown at this time how the Public Health Nurse issue would end or what costs may be involved or whether the state will help with the costs. Some funding for the Challenger Center could come from a state agency. Their public relations contractor stated they could raise one-half of the funds needed to build the facility. For the rest, they may need to make a separate request for funding to the Governor. He added, in order to get that extra funding from the Governor, it may be necessary to hire a lobbyist. He indicated Ashley Reed, who had been the lobbyist for the city in the past, has a close relationship with the Governor as well as the State Board of Education. He asked council if they would be willing to listen to a plan from Reed. Williams also stated he had already talked with Reed and told him if council was willing to talk with Reed, Reed will have to come with a plan, as well as being sure to forvvard reports to council and on-time billings, etc. Discussion followed regarding Reed. Bookey commented he was not sure Reed had brought anything to the city and didn't have a lot of faith in him. Smalley stated he could be very effective with the legislature at this time. Williams noted effectiveness is sometimes hard. to measure. Bannock asked if it would be an advantage or disadvantage to have Reed working with Northwest Strategies. Williams noted he could help in other areas as well. Smalley stated he was not willing to go into a contract with him at this time, but would listen to a plan in order to make a decision. Swarner and Bookey agreed with Smalley. Council referred to Resolution No. 96-69 which was included in the packet of information for the session. The resolution was to list the city's FY98 Capital Project Matching Grant Program projects and request state funding. Kornelis requested council inform him of what project they wanted to list. Funding to request was calculated at $210,257. The city's match amount would be 30%. Council agreed to have one project for the amount of $210,257 and it to be "Water Quality and Quantity Development Program." KENAI CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION WORK SESSION SEPTEMBER 16, 1996 PAGE 6 William suggested the Governor's Matching Grant Program be placed as Item No. 1 on the city brochure. Komelis reported DEC suggested he add to the three DEC grant requests a Phase I of the upgrade of the STP for the amount of $302,000 because it will be a big costly project. DEC wanted to do a Phase I first to do the plans and specifications, etc. Because the brochure did not have to be completed at this time, council requested the item be placed on the October 2, 1996 agenda. ADJOURNMENT The work session ended at 10:00 p.m. Note~/s transcribed and,~s`ub~mitted by: Carol L. Freas, City Clerk ~J ~-' STAFF REPORT To: Planning & Zoning Commission Date: September 19, 1996 Prepared By: JL/mk Res: PZ96-63 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Whitford Surveying 1902 Wyatt Way Kenai, AK 99611 Requested Action: Preliminary Plat Approval Legal Description: Mission Estates Existing Zoning: TSH-Townsite Historic District Current Land Use: High Density Residential/Commercial/Historic ANALYSIS City Engineer: This plat formally dedicates right-of-way needed to construct the new Mission Street improvement project. The city has initiated the plat and is negotiating with the owners to compensate them for each parcel. Note that the ownership information for the church needs to be changed as follows: Archpriest Nicholas Molodyko-Harris, Chancellor, Orthodox Diocese of Alaska Chancery, P.O. Box 240805, Anchorage, AK 99524-0805. Building Official: No building code issues. RECOMMENDATIONS Approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Resolution No. PZ96-63 2. Preliminary Plat CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUT/ON NO. PZ 96-63 SUBDIVISION PLAT A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI RECOMMENDING THAT THE ATTACHED SUBDIVISION PLAT BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: WHEREAS, the attached plat Mission Estates was referred to the City of Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission on September 16, 1996 and received from Whitford Surveying ,and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission finds: 1) Plat area is zoned TSH-Townsite Historic District and therefore subject to said zone conditions. 2) Water and sewer: Available 3) Plat does not subdivide property within a public improvement district subject to special assessments. There is not a delinquency amount owed to the City of Kenai for the referenced property. 4) Installation agreement or construction of improvements is not required. 5) Status of surrounding land is shown. 6) Utility easements, if required, shall be shown. 7) Surveyor verifies that no encroachments exist. 8) Street names designated on the plat are correct. 9) CONTINGENCIES: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI THAT THE KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE MISSION ESTATES SUBJECT TO ANY NEGATIVE FINDINGS AS STATED ABOVE. PASSED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, SEPTEMBER 25 .1996. `~ HAIRPERSON ~~, A TE T: Planning Secretary V n NI i °c W V Y 3 ~ : ~ a Q °a ~ - ~ ~ W _ ~ :i V < I C o . V n<~ u ° or Wta W ~ ~ W N a . ~ :~ "n h ~e z < `V i >.. u a^a os~ k a O j H ` N~ y .~'. t• .. at o ~ ° r K _ S ~ O ~«_I ~ } ~ :l v_ ° o i i a V I d ~•~ V ~ P' O r 0 0 ;Jw VI a~ ~ ~ o N 'ti;,. Q ~ o a y, n n _Z J •. v ~ ~~. . { < a ~ .~. O rD .s. ~' ~'sti ~ o ~ ._ ~Or~ p yo = ~ a' b, r `~l 6 •4 y . ~~~ 2 y s 6 Q ~>6, u •. rv ,.~ q: 4~yn \~~ a ~! ~ b, i\ s '~ b 7 ~ 4~. %.` ~~ d f~L to ~ idol \\ ' Y Q ~Or. ~% wo al. I ,9 ar c '~ 6- J'9~ o~s~ ~> 'a d O /.' .q~ s \ f • ~ ~ <. / . , ,, ~:. v >/~' ~~~ ~,,~ y.. ~~ ~/ 'b - 4.2, f y N N / ~. Q m 'o. ~; ~ ~. ~~ oti 4-...~ ~ - 'a `S n tit/ ~~ \~ .'P F O ~ ~~ y /.P I ~ " o 1 / O ~ ~ v Y ~~ ~O O .6,~! ~ e tip.. _ ~ ~~yJ, 'ii _ o~ 5 ' `\`r ~~I.U .~r 9 err l / Q et R~'~S ti ~~ . i a a ... n ~ ti ~ ~I i l~' '+~ a J b S~ ~I~e. H +; F ~ `t ~ ~.._ O r o ro ~1 ~ x ~ j Z w ~ .. x _ ~,'. •4y a ,•`M1 e = ° O Q v"i `', f. P ' I ~'..,, N °o r s - ~r ` ~ ~ a ., o W « Y 8 ~ ^ Q H ^ . , ~ • °~. r ~ .~ ~ ~. .a j N Q p .. ~ a '" n $ , ~~• ~~ ~ ~~ I 1°. 177711G ~~ o° u Q "' WIY~1G74 ~ ~ ~ 5~ t r ~ Z O ~ < W Z r ~ p 177y1G 77lOIJG W ~' "= o Q _ ~ 8 8 _ ~ I~ $ $ $ o r CITY OF KENAI (~ ~ ~~ ~~ e~~~ ~ ~~~-. ~ 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 _ FAX 907-283-3014 ~ ~I~I~r 1992 CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The following public hearing has been Scheduled for the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of September 25, 1996: An application for an Encroachment Permit for side yard setbacks for the property described as Lot 4, Block 1, Inlet View Subdivision (425 Rogers Road), Kenai, Alaska. The Meeting will commence at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. Anyone wishing to present testimony concerning this permit should do so at the hearing or submit written comments to the City of Kenai, Planning Department, 210 Fidalgo, Suite 2.00 Kenai Alaska 9961 1-7794 prior to September 25th. For more information please contact Jack La Shot or Marilyn Kebschull at 283-7933. YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE BECAUSE YOU OWN/LEASE PROPERTY WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE PROJECT SITE OR ARE AN INTERESTED PARTY September 9, 1996 STAFF REPORT To: Planning & Zoning Commission Date: September 6, 1996 Prepared By: JL/mk Res: PZ96-61 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Shane Bowlin 425 Rogers Road P.O. Box 8317 Kenai, AK 99611 Nikiski, AK 99635 Requested Action: Encroachment Permit Legal Description: Lot 4, Block 1, Inlet View Subdivision Existing Zoning: RS-Suburban Residential Current Land Use: Medium Density Residential ANALYSIS City Engineer: The existing single story house (constructed in 1978) encroaches 2 inches and 4 inches into each 5 foot required side yard setback, respectively. The encroachment is on each rear corner of the house. The pie-shaped lot with a rectangular house contributes to the situation. Building Official: The building permit (copy attached) clearly shows a 5 foot side yard setback requirement. RECOMMENDATIONS Approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. PZ96-61 2. Application 3. Drawings CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ENCROACHMENT PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PZ 96-61 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI GRANTING A REQUEST FOR AN ENCROACHMENT PERMIT AS AUTHORIZED BY 14.20.185 OF THE KENAI MUNICIPAL CODE FOR: NAME: Shane Bowlin LOCATED: 425 Rogers Road LEGAL: .Lot 4, Block 1, Inlet View Subdivision BY: Shane Bowlin WHEREAS, the Commission finds: 1. That an application meeting the requirements of Section 14.20.185 (c) has been submitted and received on September 5, 1996 2. This land is on land zoned RS-Suburban Residential 3. That the applicant has demonstrated with plans and other documents that he can and does meet the following specific requirements as set forth in Sec. 14.20.185 (d1: (1) An encroachment as defined in KMC 14.20.185 (a) exists. (2) The encroachment does not encroach upon a Federal, State or City right- of-way or utility easement. (3) The issuance of the encroachment permit will not authorize a use which is not a principal permitted use in the zoning district in which the property is located. (41 The encroachment is not located across a platted lot line. 4. That a duly advertised public hearing as required by Section 14.20.280 was conducted by the Commission on September 25 , 1996. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Kenai that the applicant has demonstrated that the proposed development meets the criteria for said permit and therefore the Commission does authorize the permit to be issued. PASSED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of the City of Kenai, Alaska this 25`h ay of September , 1996. ~ :: -,' I~CL ~-~%. ~~~ C r ATTE T: Planning Secretary CHAIRPERSON j '~l_'i f ~Pj d~114 P. 1i:. 179'1-1981 CITY OF KENA! .__ 210 FIOALGQ KENAI. ALASKA 890~~1234~Q TELEFFIQNE 283.7635 -A FAX 907.283.3Q14 ~`~' ~ ,S~ ~- ~ ~~~ O N W ~x_ _+A"I APPLICATION FOR ENCROACHMENT PERMIT c~`~~toz6-.a~ NAME' " STREET ADDT~ESS ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ('. ~ , MAILING. ADDRESS , ~ , ~ L ~ 7 ~ . ~ ~ °1 ct LEGAL::. DESCRIPTI ON LOt- ~ ~ I D L ~ I ~~ ~ ~ ~-- ~ ~ ~ ~Z~RING~DhSTRICT ~.(Gircl~, I} C CC CG RR RR-1 RU R IL zH RR-2 RS RS-1 RS-2 ~~,PHUNE `~ `7 Ca " c~g$ I ~ ~ C.o - ~ S Section 24.20.185 of the Kenai Municipal Code outlines regulations for Encroachment Permits whxoh is the relaxation of the Development Requirements Table to remedy encroachments which do not fall under Scotian 14.20.050, nonconforming uses and which satisfy the requirements of financial institutions subject to the following coriditioris: PLEASE R THE FOLLOWING, COMPLETE xHE BLANKS AND INITIAL THE SPACE AFTER T>3IE ITEM NIIMBER TO INDICATE THAT YOII HA4E READ AND O'NDERBTAND THERE CONDITIONS. 1. ~~ An encroachment means any object or structure above or below ground and constructed or located in a Wanner other than set forth in the Development Requircments Table. 2. ~' Provide a site plan of the propert~r including location of all existing buildings, rights-of-way or easements, setbacks, elevations, and any data pertinent to the application. 3. A Public Notification and Hearing is required before the issuance of this permit. A $10.5.00 nonrefundable depositJadvertising fee is required to cover these notification casts. (Please see attached procedure sheet) A ~~1~p ~ D I / T/~ y T ~ ~0 . N A ,~ L C Q M M /E N T 3 _`f._0 //7 n/~ /l°5r'!,'. ~1./l.," (gCL__fty.l4/Ij. )/ir/~Prt~iy ~(} (alY.el li/lam/<Cc~~C°. Signature of AppliCarit: ~~~~c~, ~.~r~L~_ / ~~ ~~ /~ u,~C. fob i i ,1 . ~ ~ ~ 1 . ' ROGERS ' ' ROAD • •• 3O• ~00~~• r b ' ~p i r ^~ %.9L ~ u I ` ~~ZK~_[31t5C r1~~ ~ n ~~ I CL•'1 SL~..~1,t 'iT L1~ tu,~;. a a t,~N~~-6 /nr..~~.y ro " ~ ktbrblNq K C ~ . ~• LoT ~ ~ 7;777.7- ~ 4.v ` - >? •• °<<K io' l.oT 6' g ~~7 ~ 3 ~ n h 1 v p~ T ~J,. 0 '~~' -° h lo,_•_j1TI~.~y!~~SMT . I.oY to LOT SURVEY CERTIFICATION -J. Q"1 L THrs I.oT S6R~/RO 4V <rTy S6WE0. ANO WATGi=. O.,F A(~M>,~ id '~,.`C1.1. ~~ ~ '~ ,~... ~tlh1~>Z:~1 as t w+,+l~ ~~ t>rsto~ r a~0 ~aM ..,r..-. e ar~~ron~~ w~~~,; LOT H BLOCK I TRACT xN~. 't v-~W S~t~illL'r.-'S1:1~~ ~4r.rn1 RECORDING DISTRICT LEGEND ~ Brass Cap Mon.. • Heber/Pipe (Found) (Found) p riaber 15 x 30"(Set this survoy) Owner: Gate: FEB. Z5, 1~81o Drawn: R~..J Scale: I"~bo' +1.O~NL7oo .Q.1 na-Built Certificates I I~or.ol>y cortiCy l.hut I hnva ourveyod lho Collowing described property: ~L;' °locK / /M~CZ VIlW ~u_bd~_ and that no encroachtnenta exist except as indicated. . Exclusion Notes It is tl~e responsibility oP the owner to dekermine the existence of any ease- monts,covenantsror restrictions which dv not appear on the recorded subdivi - sion p1at.Under no circumstances should any data hereon be used for construction ac•for establishing boundary or fence lines. RICE-Wf{-TfOpDRnS50ClAlES, INC. I ~~ n S~ ISS Smdh l4'dl•, Sullt ]0) ~ in6lnlna, ~V.1~1~.~ 'Inf.f.'1 F-t (N(;INIfkS 7G7.9~' ~UNI'(YURC BUILDING APPLICATION AND PERMIT BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT CITY OF KENAI BOX 580 PHONE 283-7535 PERMITTEE OWNER, ADDRESS_-3~~~ B i 413 DAT v ~ LOT ~ BOCK / SU ~-~`"' !/-~C.Q~I DIOSTRIICG ~ .~ ZONE CONTRACT CITY LICENSE NO. ADDRESS STATE LICENSE NO. DESCRIPTION OF WORK NEW ALTERATION ^ ADDITION ^ REPAIRS ^ DEMOLITION ^ OTHER ^ IF OTHER SPECIFY PLUMBING ELECTRICAL BUILDING APPROVALS SIGNATURE DATE APPROVALS SIGNATURE DATE APPROVALS SIGNATURE DATE GROUND WORK ROUGH-IN LOCATION ROUGH-IN FIXTURES 8 FORM AND GAS PRESSURE APPLIANCES FOUNDATION TEST ENTRANCE REINFORCING STEEL SEWER L INE METERS FRAMING APPLIANCES & VENTS INTERIOR -1NAL FINAL - EXTERIOR - l.. _ JF STRUCTURES ..Z HEIGHT: WIDT LENGT ~ f, USE OF STRUCTURE ~ <. pT ~ ~ i ~. ~G .C I REIE BLOCK LOT AREA: OFF REET PARKING: GARAGE FRONT-YARD ? .. ~~ SIDE-YARD ~~_~~ REAR-YARD ~ FIREPLACE VALUE OF CONSTRUCTION: (MUST INCLUDE ALL LABORI FINAL WATER: O PRIVATE CITY ~ SEPTIC TANK: O YES ~'NO PLAN CHECK FEE AMOUNT DISTANCE FROM WELL i0 SEWAGE DISPOSAL: NATURAL GAS: ~ES ONO ~ ~ ELECTRICAL SERVICE AMPERAGE /r TOTA/L VALUATION PERMIT FEE Vr 7 S~ O'<~J . ~`a ,0 13 ~~ 1 / The undersigned applicant agrees to fully exonerate, indemnify and save harmless the City of Kenai, Alaska from and against any and all claims or actions, and all expenses incidenttal to the defense of any such claims or actions, based upon or arising out of damage or 'njuries (including depth) to This permit is issued, or by conditions creoted there persons or property caused by or sustained in connecti n with the performance of the work for which by, and among other things, if requested by the Cify of Kenai, to o~vsume, without expense fo jNeyCity, n defense any such claims or actions. BUILDING PERMIT EXPIRES IN ONE YEett FQOtu_neu nc tcaa _ i X ~.~'2• SIGNATURE OF PERMITTEE OR AGENT BUILDING OFF DATE /' ~ Lam! CITY OF I(ENAI (~> ~~ ~ 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 _ _ FAX 907-283-3014 ~ IFAmdtn nh 'III'1 1992 CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The following public hearing has been Scheduled for the Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting of September 25, 1996: An application for a Variance Permit for a single family dwelling on a collector street in CG-General Commercial zone for the property described as Lot 14, Block 2, Thompson Park Subdivision (265 Fireweed), Kenai, Alaska. The Meeting will commence at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. Anyone wishing to present testimony concerning this permit should do so at the hearing or submit written comments to the City of Kenai, Planning Department, 210 Fidalgo, Suite 200 .Kenai Alaska 9961 1-7794 prior to September 25th. For more information please contact Jack La Shot or Marilyn Kebschull at 283-7933. YOU ARE BEING SENT THIS NOTICE BECAUSE YOU OWN/LEASE PROPERTY WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE PROJECT SITE OR ARE AN INTERESTED PARTY September 1 1, 1996 STAFF REPORT To: Planning & Zoning Commission Date: 9/11 /96 Prepared By: JL/mk Res: PZ96-62 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Loretta Schoolcraft P.O. Box 3197 Soldotna, AK 99669 Requested Action: Variance Legal Description: Lot 14, Block 2, Thompson Park Subdivision Existing Zoning: CG-General Commercial Current Land Use: Lot Vacant-Surrounding properties commercial/medium density '` residential ANALYSIS City Engineer: The applicant wishes to move a log home to the referenced lot, to be used as a single family dwelling. The KMC allows this use only "as a secondary use except on the ground floor of the part of the building fronting on collector streets and major highways." The lot fronts on Fireweed Lane, which should be considered a collector street. Building Official: A building permit is required with a plot plan prepared by a land surveyor prior to moving the building. RECOMMENDATIONS Considering the commercial/residential mix in the area, and that the variance would allow a use now listed as secondary (with stipulations), recommend approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1 . Resolution No. PZ96-62 2. Application 3. Drawings CITY.OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION l1!(J. PZ 96-62 VARIANCE A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI GRANTING A VARIANCE AS AUTHORIZED BY 14.20.180 OF THE KENAI ZONING CODE: Applicant LORETTA SCHOOLCRAFT Located LOT 14, BLOCK 2, THOMPSON PARK SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, The Commission finds that Section 14.20.180 provides that a variance from the strict provisions of the zoning code may be granted by the Commission if all conditions specified in 14.20.180 are met, and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission finds: 1) That an application meeting the requirements for a variance has been submitted and received on September 10, 1996 21 That this request is located on land zoned CG-General Commercial 3) That the applicant seeks a variance from the specified requirement of the Zoning code: Single family dwelling on collector street 4) a. Special conditions or circumstances are present which are peculiar to the land or structures involved which are not applicable to other lands or structures n the same land use or zoning district. b. The special conditions or circumstances have not been caused by actions of the applicant and such conditions and circumstances do not merely constitute pecuniary hardship or inconvenience. c. The granting of the variance does not authorize a use that is not a permitted principal use in the zoning district in which the property is located. d. The granting of the variance is the minimum variance that will provide for the reasonable use of the land and/or structure. The granting of the variance is not based upon other non-conforming land uses or structures within the sale land use or zoning district. 5) That a duly advertised Public Hearing according to KMC 14.20.153 was held September 25, 1996 . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI THAT THE CONDITIONS SPECIFIED IN 14.20.280 HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO EXIST AND THEREFORE GRANTS THE VARIANCE. PASSED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, SEPTEMBER 25 1996. J ~ l ~ /~ -- , CHAIRPERSON T ST: Plannin~j Secretary ~~ -~ CITY OF KENAI RICEVTE\~I.-~L yi.~o9e wrl~a~~stG'c~y mm~a ~" ~ ,;~ ,,atiC ~ ,, ~: C'~~~`~ ~I~z~ SEp X96 nyb;~~~~ 210 Fidalgo Avenue a•~ C' ~~~t21 ~'~~ ~~~,,~~s~~^~~ Kenai, Alaska 99611 p,, y ~.c TELEPHONE 283-7535 FAX 907-283-3014 DATE : ~~ ~~ ' %~p APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE PERMIT NAME : /~1~~ 'f'-!/) , ~~~ ~~ f n /~~~ PHONE : .~l(~ ~~~ MAILING ADDRESS : ~/~ ~ ~ ~ ~.1o~~Y ~Q ~ ~l1`l1' LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY INVOLVED : ,~~~~ /,~' ~jQ/I'I~St~~t1 r~r'~J~ ~N ZONING DISTRICT (Circle one): C ~.~° RR-1 RR-2 RS-1 RS-2 RU/TSH CC CG IL IH R Section 14.20.180 of the Kenai Municipal Code outlines regulations for Variance Permits which is the relaxation of the Development Requirements Table to provide relief when the literal enforcement would deprive a property owner of the reasonable use of his real property: PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING, COMPLETE THE BLANKS AND INITIAL THE SPACE AFTER THE ITEM NIIMBER TO INDICATE THAT YOII HAVE READ D IINDERSTAND THESE CONDITIONS. 1. ~ Provide a site plan of the property including location of t' d d buildin s or alterations ..~ ,. ..~ all exis ing an propose g , elevations of such buildings or alterations, and such data as may be required. A Public Notification and Hearing is required before the issuance of this permit. A $105.00 non-refundable deposit/advertising fee is required to cover these notification costs. (Please see attached procedure sheet) Special conditions or circumstances are present which are peculiar to the land or structures involved which are not applicable to other lands or structures in the same land use or zoning district. The special conditions or circumstances have not been caused by actions of the applicant and such conditions and circumstances do not merely constitute a monetary hardship or inconvenience. VARIANCE APPLICATION Page 2 5. The granting of the variance does not authorize a use tht is not a permitted principal use in the zoning district in which the property is located. 6.~~~~~ The granting of the variance is the minimum variance that will provide for the reasonable use of the land and/or structure. 7.( The granting of a variance shall not be based upon other non-conforming land uses or structures within the same land use or zoning district. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: Applicant's Signature: ~~ ~ ~G/~ ''/ A roved : ~~, q~~1" PP ` . J'~~G ~/ CHAIRPERSON Att t: Ma i yn Re schull, ecretary C:\WPDOCS\FORMS\VARIANCE.PG2 .-+ C~2 CJ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ rn 0 0 0 z Q w Q a w 0 r~ '~ U J '~ ~W `/ TW/~ '^V 11 1~1 O ~s, M~ o, 0 1 0 -~-~ , ~~ ~. ~ ~'" g ,n -~ ~ ~ L" . O O ;1; .~ . - ?- _=_ ,___~_ - ------ .~ -O ~ m -Cl~ Y ~ ` ._ ~_< Q- ==z a- _ :.y Y Z CSi /, :l O H ~. Z 3 ~ ~ ~ I O ~ ~ , ~ c a G 4, J -_ 'I 1 I i f 'J 'f. i ~i ~ - c I rt _~ i ~. . i ,_ ^' ~I _ '' N,~ a S/ I` ~ldf ~-o s~~ ~.~ gas` ., ; , . .~ ~ 1 ~ ! ~ ~-~~ ~~ ~od~ -~ } a3' 'PY'o Pct ~ ~.o Gam.' `i0n- s~ ~.+~+~.~ i..~~. o, T i ~~ •~,~ n ~--- ~ ~ ~ ~ ---, ~ ~ --- ~ _r~_r_~~5-----~= ~ '=G ~ _______ .._.~-- "/ < ; - T. ~,- ,, ~~ ,,~ __ _ -- --- ._ ....- _T - f _ - -' A ~ .. f ~- i ~= ,~ - ~ J T ----------------~ -~.- -~-_ __,_ ~ _ __ _ ~ -- - _~...----- -- ~-~ - - t------% ~~ ~_~ _ _ __ _. ,. _ - ~ / ~ -- -- ~-- ~ _ 1 ~ __-~------ .~ -- _. ,~ ~~ r- ~ ~ , ----- - -~- --- --- ----- ~ C I r; .i ,~ ,.. --- __ -- ~, •• t /~/~ C// /i / f, i _--- - _---_~~-_-- -- ---1--- ~ / .l _ .__ - - 1 c~ c~ AGENDA KENAI CITY COUNCIL - REGULAR MEETING SEPTEMBER 18, 1996 7:00 P.M. KENAI CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS http://www.Kenai.net/city A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Approval 4. Consent Agenda *All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non-controversial by the Council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. H. SCHEDULED PIIBLIC COMMENT (10 Minutes) C. PUBLIC HEARINGS ~~~ 1. Ordinance No. 1716-96 - Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $8,333.33 in the General Fund for Informational Signage in the Kenai Townsite Historic District and the Shkituk' Village Site. 2. Ordinance No. 1718-96 - Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $6,100 in the Boating Facility Enterprise Fund for Purchase of New Floats. T ~ a. Consideration of substitute Ordinance No. 1718-96 - I i ~ ncreas ng Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $6,300 in the Boating Facility Enterprise Fund for Purchase of New Floats. D,~~~ ~. 3. /K Resolution No. 96-69 - Listing the City's FY98 Capital Project Matching Grant Program Projects in Priority for a Request in State Funding. ~' ~~ 4. Resolution No. 96-70 - Declaring Equipment, Supplies, and M t a erials Surplus or Obsolete. 5. Resolution No. 96-71 - Awarding a Contract for Consultant Services on the Project Entitled "Alaska Regional Aircraft Fire Training Center" to Morrison Maierle, Inc, for the Not-to-Exceed Amount of -1- ~~~G(. 6. Resolution No. 96-72 - Transferring $1,300 in the Council on Aging.- Borough Special Revenue Fund for Purchase of a Coffee Maker. 7. Resolution No. 96-73 - Transferring $6,000 in the ~~~~G~ ~' Boating Facility Enterprise Fund for Repair of Dock Piling. D. COMMISSION/COMMITTEE REPORTS 1. Council on Aging 2. Airport Commission 3. Harbor Commission 4. Library Commission 5. Parks & Recreation Commission 6. Planning & Zoning Commission 7. Miscellaneous Commissions and Committees a. Beautification Committee b. Historic District Board c. Challenger Steering Committee d. Kenai Visitors & Convention Bureau Board E. MINUTES 1. *Board of Adjustment Hearing of September 4, 1996/The Matter of Michael R. Christian/Prime Residential Zone. 2. *Regular Meeting of September 4, 1996. F. CORRESPONDENCE G. OLD BIIBINE88 1. Discussion - City Manager Search. ~~~~~ 2. Approval - Contract with K. Scott & Associates/Public Health Nurse Rental Space Review. H. NEW BIISINESS 1. Bills to be Paid, Bills to be Ratified ~~~2~~'v2 Purchase Orders Exceeding $2,500 3. *Ordinance No. 1719-96 - Amending KMC 13.40.020(c) to Impose a Minimum Fine for Unlawful Operation of an Off- Road Vehicle in the City Limits. -2- s 4. *Ordinance No. 1720-96 - Increasing Estimated Revenues and Appropriations by $125,000 in a New Capital Project Fund Entitled "Taxiway Extension North." 5. Discussion - FAA Cleanup of EOF Land (Antenna Farm). ~~~~~i~~ ~~ ~y~,~,~y . Discussion - New Street Lights . EBECIITIVE SESSION I. ADMINISTRATION REPORTS 1. Mayor 2. City Manager 3. Attorney 4. City Clerk 5. Finance Director 6. Public Works Director 7. Airport Manager J. DISCIISSION 1. Citizens (five minutes) 2. Council R. ADJOQRNMENT -3- KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION BOROUGH ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ASSEMBLY CHAMBERS SOLDOTNA, ALASKA SEPTEMBER 23, 1996 7:30 P.M. Tentative Agenda A. CALL TO ORDER ~ ~- b '1~t~k 0~ ~- ~ ~ rN- ~ ~ r •©~,~ ~ti JOf11 Harrw"°t'r'an B. ROLL CALL Chaiman AroaMrids ram E~Irss 1999 C. APPROVAL OF REGULAR AGENDA AND ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA PhIHp lsryaon Vie Chafm~an Kenal Cky All items on the cazsent ag zdr _~Te considered ra.4ine and noncortrcversial by the Planning Term E~Ires ~ 998 Commission and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Planning Commissioner or someone from the public so requests, in which case the item will be Ann 1Alf~lfnttore-Palmer removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the regular agenda. Petl~msr~tarlan 6Aooee Pass Atbs If you wish to comment on a consent agenda item or a regular agenda item other than a public hearing, Tenn 1997 please advise the recording secrete before the meetin N g begins, and she will inform the Chairman of your wish to comment. Peggy G.Boscacd Pc "~~ 1. Time Extension Requests -None seldovla cry ram E~Ires 1997 2. Plats Granted Administrative Approval Wayne Carpenter PC Member sswaro cry 3. Plats Granted Final Approval Under 20 04 070 -None Term Ekes 1999 . . Robert clults 4. KPBPC Resolutions -None PC Member Ancfwr PdM Tenn E~Ires 1998 5. Coastal Management Program Wes cobnwrn Pc Manber soldot cr a. Coastal Management Program Consistency Reviews rw y Term E~Iros 1989 -None Leroy Gannaway Pc frlember b. Conclusive Consistency Determinations Received H0m°r cry from DGC Tsrm E~bes 1998 Ellis Hensley, Jr. PC Member c. Administrative Determinations -None NUdsM Tenn E~Ires 1999 6. Kenai River Habitat Protection (KPB 21.18) -None Brsnt Johnson PC °'~°"'~°` lCaslbf Area 7. Commissioner Excused Absences Term E~kss 1997 Ta,,, ~„~ a. No excused absences requested. PC Member ~'"d~ 8 Minutes Tenn E~Ires 1998 . 1 Don G~Irtaut, tWiyt)r _ . P~Dirsctor k ~: ~,~~r~, ~a~~ .S 3 ~,. a. September 9, 1996 ~;,, D~:~',~ PUBLIC COMMENT AND PRESENTATIONS (Items other than those appearing on the agenda. Limited to three minutes per speaker unless previous arrangements are made.) E, ~ ~ UNFINISHED BUSINESS [. _ `' °~ 1. Public Hearing; Petition to vacate approximately 207 feet of a 66 foot section line easement associated with Lots 26 and 35, Greening Vista Subdivisions; within Sections 2 and 3, Township 6 South, Range 13 West, Seward Meridian, Homer Recording District, Alaska; KPB File 96-152; POSTPONED TO 10/28/96. F. PUBLIC HEARINGS Petition to Vacate portion of Mansfield Avenue and associated utility easements; Mansfield Subdivision, Lots 3 & 4 (Plats 78-94 and 85-86 HRD); Sec 23, T5S, R12W, S.M., Alaska; KPB File 96- 182 2. A Resolution classifying KPB land located in the Kasilof area at approximately Mile Post 112.5, on the west side of the Sterling Highway, south of Red Ribbon Road as Waste Handling and Rural G. VACATIONS NOT REQUIRING A PUBLIC HEARING Eagle's Roost S/D Tract B -Vacate utility easement Section 35, T5N, RBW, S.M., AK KPB File 96-179 H. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS Mayoni S/D Tract B -Building Setback Exception KPBPC Resolution 96-38: Granting an exception to the twenty foot building setback limit for a portion of Tract B, Mayoni S/D (Plat 76- 177 KRD); Section 23, Township 5 North, Range 10 West, Seward Meridian, Alaska; KPB File 96-186 2. Ordinance 96-43: Authorizing the Mayor to Conditio^31ly Seld Rea! Property Located in the Cooper Landing Vicinity of Pixie Smith CONSIDERATION OF PLATS Mansfield 1996; west of Falls Creek Preliminary; Mullikin Surveys KPB File 96-182 2. Ryan S/D Richmond Replat; Kenai City Preliminary; Integrity Surveys KPB File 96-183 3. Schlereth S/D Sanders Addn. North of Robinson Loop Road; Preliminary Integrity Surveys KPB File 96-187 4. Dawn Glow S/D No. 3; Soldotna City Preliminary; McLane Consulting Group KPB File 96-184 5. Moose Range Meadows South, Birch Addn. South shore of Kenai River; Preliminary Swan Surveying KPB File 96-185 6. Twin Creek S/D No. 2 South of Diamond Ridge Road; Preliminary Herndon & Thompson, Inc. KPB File 96-188 J. KENAI RIVER HABITAT PROTECTION (KPB 21.18} Application for Conditional Use Permit Under Ordinance 96-06; Lot 6, Poachers Cove Planned Unit Development Amended; River Mile 17.3 Right bank; to construct a carport and deck within fifty feet of ordinary high water of the Kenai River; Parcel No. 057-489-40; Measles. 2. Application for Conditional Use Permit Under Ordinance 96-06; a portion of Government Lot 8, Section 4, T5N, R11 W, S.M.: River Mile 1.4 Right Bank; to construct a bank protection project within fifty feet of mean high water of the Kenai River, Parcel No. 049- 011-27; Dickerson. K. COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS -None L. OTHER/NEW BUSINESS Planning Director's Decision; 21.13.160 Prior Existing Use a. Phillips; T5N, R11 W, Section 23 S.M.; KPB Parcel No. 05503154 b. Bremond; T5N, R11 W, Section 25 S.M.; KPB Parcel No. 05555030 M. ASSEMBLY COMMENTS N. DIRECTOR'S COMMENTS O. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS P. ADJOURNMENT The work session scheduled .for 5:30 p.m. on September 23 in the Assembly Chambers at the Borough Administration Building has been canceled. The next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting is October 14, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. in the Assembly Chambers at the Borough Administration Building in Soldotna. - MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL ITEMS NO ACTION REQUIRED 1. Kachemak Bay Advisory Planning Commission September 19, 1996 Agenda 2. Meeting Notice and Agenda; Status of Spruce Bark Beetle Infestations, Kenai Peninsula Borough ~~..~- KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION REVISED NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 1518 j v'~e'~ r?. N w ~MJ 1 PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT HAS RECEIVED TO CONSTRUCT A BANK PROTECTION PROJECT WITHIN THE 50' KENAI RIVER HABITAT PROTECTION AREA. THE ACTIVITY UNDER CONSIDERATION IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: A. REQUEST AND LOCATION: A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT APPROXIMATELY 275 LINEAL FEET OF LOG CRIB WALL ABOVE MEAN HIGH WATER. THE SITE OF THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY IS LOCATED WITHIN A PORTION OF GOVERNMENT LOT 8 IN THE SW1/4 OF THE SW1/4 OF SECTION 4, TSN, R11W, S.M., EXCLUDING BRIDGE ACCESS ROAD. (A PRELIMINARY, UNRECORGED PLAT REFERS TO THE SUBJECT PARCEL AS LOT 3, BLOCK 3, KRISTINE SUBDIVISION N0.1.) B. DESCRIPTION AS STATED IN PERMIT: COOK INLET PROCESSING (CIP), PROPERTY LESSOR, WISHES TO PROTECT THE CUT BANK ON THIS PROPERTY TO PREVENT FURTHER EROSION SUFFERED WHEN HIGH TIDES GREATER THAN +23FT ARE ACCOMPANIED BY HIGH SOUTHERLY WINDS. CIP PROPOSES TO USE LOG CRIBS LINED WITH GEOTEXTILE AND FILLED WITH EARTH TO ACCOMPLISH THIS. C. PETITIONER: JOHN DICKERSON OF NIKISKI, ALASKA, FOR CIP AS AGENT FOR DON FREDRICKSON OF ANCHORAGE, ALASKA, PROPERTY OWNER. PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION ON MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 23, 1996, COMMENCING AT 7:30 P.M., OR AS SOON THEREAFTER AS BUSINESS PERMITS. MEETING TO BE HELD IN THE BOROUGH ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING, SOLDOTNA, ALASKA. ANYONE WISHING TO TESTIFY MAY COME TO THE ABOVE MEETING TO GIVE TESTIMONY OR MAY SUBMIT A WRITTEN STATEMENT TO THE ATTENTION OF LISA PARKER, OR KEN BRYANT, KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH PLANNING DEPARTMENT - 144 N. BINKLEY STREET - SOLDOTNA, ALASKA 99669. WRITTEN TESTIMONY SHOULD BE RECEIVED BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1996. COMMENTS MAY BE SENT BY FAX TO 262-8618. FOR ADDTIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT KEN BRYANT, KENAI RIVER CENTER, 260-4882. KEN BRYANT RESOURCE PLANNER NOTE: You are being sent this notice because you are a property owner adjacent to or within 300 feet of fhe described property. Revised legal description September 16, 1996 Vl ~ C I "+ / Cal i 2~ / ~ a ~~O o > r / / 4 w m ~ `.' t~ ,®' ~~ ~~ ~ ~ r~ a ~ = ;;~ "w ~ ,,~ - - I ,n,, ~ av ~ ~ .~ ~y I 40~ ~ ~ _ ~ G = ~ y~l ' ~ _ ~- c; a ~ ; ~ ~ ~~! - - f _ - 3AY SQIIHJ ~ , ~ - - -. _ + y N s F ~ I q _- ~ ~ ~ ~ r tl Q ~ i Z] ii - o ter'. w ~ ~~ ' J r `i F ~• ii`%:• ~' • ~~Jiv... : '1:' F iU'R.'r.' . ~i `{ ~ .yt nan ~~ :• `gym ~"y ~ r~ p '~ L" F rn'' O ~ ~ ~ a ~ i o o~ ~ ~ W r~ ~ ° U ~ ~ t: z e ~ x ~~ ¢ 'C \ o ~ x "~ E"' A / ~ . v ~a ~' Z ~ ~ ~ z ~ ;r; ~- ° ; ~ p Ofd ~ I ~ _ ~~ c d ~ ~ a ~ O x ~ 1 __ _ 1 w a C7 d 1 W ~ w t ia I I ,~~ "M~. ~~ KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH /~~ l!~ 144 N. BINKLEY SOLDOTNA, ALASKA 99669-7599 y ,~ , BUSINESS (907) 262-4441 FAX (907)262-1892 DON GILMAN MAYOR ~~,~$~9202~ ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL ~ R '~ 9>b S Z THE KENA1 PENINSULA BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE SUBDIVISION PLAT. ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY Tt-IE UNDERSIGNED ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1996. THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING THE PLAT WITH THE DISTRICT RECORDER WILL EXPIRE ONE YEAR ~ ~ N r SUBDIVISION: STRAWBERRY FIELDS FOREVER Qr KPB FILE 96-112 ~~~~ ~ FROM APPROVAL DATE. R BBIE HARRIS PLATTING OFFICER NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN BEFORE ME THIS `~ DAY OF 5~~~-2m~-er 1996. NOTARY PUBLIC FOR STATE AKA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: -' l ~~~ NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF ALASKA MARIA E. SWEPPY SURVEY FIRM HAS BEEN ADVISED OF ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS, IF ANY, TO QE COMPLIED WITH PRIOR TO FILING PLAT WITH DISTRICT RECORDER. r2~ Memorandum Date: 09/19/96 To: Planning & Zoning Commission ~ From: Marilyn Kebschull, Administrative Assistant RE: ~ CHANGES TO ZONING MAPS Please make the following changes to your copies of the zoning map: ~. Tract A-1 and A-2 Inlet View S/D should be RS-2. 2. Warehouse Subdivision, zoning should be the same as Lot 2. The commercial zoning should not extend even though it was replatted, the zoning was not changed. 3. Lots 1 & 2 Quality Acres should be RS instead of RS-2. 4. Correct area as noted on attached map across from Kenai Central High School from RS-1 to RR-1. Attachment ~ - _. __..--.-~ _. ..,._._ _. - -f ~. -';; s,. ~ #-- ~.~-e~-'~ -mom _ _ ,_. ~-: $N~:.sy~'"~•z+' ,gYYr. ~.- ~ - . ~ a~ ~ s~ - vE a~r~5.~'W:~~~ ~`i- .a y, s - :: .~} ,,. .. l ~ .. -. ~y' ,~. ~ ,F ~~ {- ~ i :# = ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~- ~.,, _ ! - f _ _ - rx~ j' _ _ , .. __: - .w : ,. .W E •. -; - ~, ~ . ~ c ~ rso w~on~ ~a~ _ . <_ t _ A,,,,. '. t ~-. Y t~ "- _ - ALASKA !wl I '-J~ J* - aW4 J ~ ; j _ ~~`~ ~? ~. :z ~ ., 1 _- ~ '~ .. -1 ~~ ~ ~~ ~ .~ ~ = 3-: -~.. ~ ~ ~~ ~,~ ~ __ pig . ~ BEAYER LOOP ACRES; ~ ~ FFt _ l ~ ;-u~ L art-Y= -' ':i ~'-`i ~-~ j .. ~ - _ _ !! ~- elf , ~ ~ - ! d ~ ~~ _ iii _ _ ~ ~ .., r ~..~_ -_ - 1- _ _ - - _ - - - - ~_ ~~3 _ .- ~.. - I - ,~ ~ ~ _ PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Meets Second and Fourth Wednesday - 7:00 p.m. Michael R. Christian 1997 613 Maple Drive Kenai, AK 99611 283-7944 (home) Carl Glick 1998 P.O. Box 528 Kenai, AK 99611 283-7644 (home) 278-1611, ext. 4303 (work) Phil Bryson 1998 P.O. Box 1041 Kenai, AK 99611 283-4428 (home) 283-4672 (work) Teresa Werner-Quade 1999 409 McCollum Drive Kenai, AK 99611 283-5423 (home) Karen J. Mahurin 1999 P.O. Box 1073 Kenai, AK 99611 283-4697 (home) 283-4826 (work) Ron Goecke 1999 P.O. Box 3474 Kenai, AK 99611 283-9436 (home) 283-7070 (work) Barbara A. Nord 1997 690 Sycamore Kenai, AK 99611 283-9678 (home) 262-3958 (work) Ad Hoc: .Hal Smalley 105 Linwood Lane Kenai, AK 99611 Telephone: 283-7469 (home) 283-7524 (work) (9/19/96) CITY OF KENAI ~ 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99811-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 _ _ FAX 907-283-3014 ~ w~ I~ah ''1~~1 1992 Barbara A. Nord 690 Sycamore Kenai, AK 99611 RE: APPOINTMENT -PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION City of Kenai At their regular meeting of September 19, 1996, the Kenai City Council confirmed your appointment to the City of Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission. The following information in regard to your appointment is enclosed: 1. KMC Chapter 1.90 entitled, "Standard Procedures for Commissions and Committees." 2. Policy. regarding boards, commission and committees needing Council approval to request donations from the public and businesses. 3. KMC Chapter 14.05 entitled, "Planning & Zoning Commission." 4. KMC Title 14 entitled, "Planning & Zoning." The Planning & Zoning Commission meetings are held on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month, beginning at 7:00 p.m. at City Hall. Meeting agendas and packets will be mailed to you prior to each meeting. Also enclosed is a 1996 Conflict of Interest Statement which you are required to complete and return to this office as soon as possible. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Thank you for your interest in serving the City of Kenai. CITY OF KENAI ~~/~~~~ Carol L. Freas City Clerk clf Enclosures September 19, 1996 Ken~3. City Planning Zoning Commission Sept.23, 1996 Gentlemen: Regarding the request you have recieved to grant a vaiance to allow a residence on Lot 14 Block 2 Thompson Park. My wife and I operate our contracting business on Lot 16 Block land we also live there. It is not our position to object to new neighbors. However we do not believe that it makes good "planning and zoning" to grant this variance because; #1 Mr. Thompson with the citys concurrance set up this commerical area to promote small business's to locate here such as a mom & pop grocery or a gasoline station or a cabinet shop or a builder etc. Its not easy to find commerical property when .you are looking for a place to locate. I think we should protect those few areas that we do have to encourc~ge small businesses in our city. #2This applicant if successful well be locating her residence on a small lot with commerical lots on 3 sides of it. Depending on what is eventally done. on those lots it could make for a very unhappy situation. #3 We don't believe there is a compelling enough reason to grant this variance and that "planning .and zoning"would. be setting a precedence for the next such request. `~ /~ Sincerely ~' ~` Robert L. & Patricia J. Holt Box 387 Kenai Alaska 99611-0387 ~ ~ ~ ~ O C7 Z H W W Z O N O V Z_ Z O N o~ Z Z a J a ~~ ~ ~' W Q Z Q W Y ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ w = ~ U w Q m ~ C7 ~ V ~ N ,~ w a `~ Z a ~ ~ } w Z ~C Y U w ~ ~ = 1- ~ p~ Y U m w ~ C7 Q ~ U C7 ~~ f N W Q ~ ' z Q _ ~ W Y ~ F'- ~ Z V ~ cn Y } ~ w = ~ V ~ 0 0 ~ C7 G V w ° a d z Q w p Y ~ 1- w } mo = oC U ~ m 'S .7 ( ~ U V' ~~ W Q ~ ' Z Q W Y ~ H N Z U A N Y } w w Q ~ U m ~ C7 ~ U C7 w 0 `z z Q ~ ~ w Z Y (> _ ~ > 1- to ~G } m ~ w ~ w C~7 = Q ~ ~ U U C7 SIGN IN SHEET PUBLIC HEARING-- , 1996 i I NAM IADDRESS 1 2 ~ ~ (~ ~ / l- ~~/"~ C~ 3', ~ 4i 5 6! 7 8' 9~~ i 10! 11! 12! 13 14 ' 151 16! ' 17! ' 18 19 20 21! 22! ~~~~ Page 1 City of Kenai, 210 Fidalgo, Suite 200, Kenai, AK 99611-7794 Fax To: Peninsula Clarion (Attn: Sue) From:. Marilyn Kebschull Fax: 907-283-3299 Pages: (Two) Phone: 907-283-7551 Date: September 11, 1996 Re: PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE CC: File ^ Urgent ^ For Review ^ Please Comment X Please Reply ^ Please Recycle Sue: I would like to run the following announcement on September 18 and September 20, 1996, under "Legal Notice." Please call me as soon as possible with a quote and I will issue a purchase order. Thanks. September 11, 1996 J CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 210 FIDALGO STREET, SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The City of Kenai Planning & Zoning Commission will hold the following public hearings on September 25, 1996 at 7 p.m.: 1. An application for an Encroachment Permit for side yard setback requirements for the property described as Lot 4, Block 1, Inlet View Subdivision, (425 Rogers Road), Kenai, Alaska. (Resolution PZ96-61) 2. An application for a Variance Permit for a single family dwelling on a collector street in CG-General Commercial zone for the property described as Lot 14, Block 2, Thompson Park Subdivision (265 Fireweed), Kenai, Alaska. (Resolution PZ96-62) The Meeting will commence at 7:00 p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. Anyone wishing to present testimony concerning these items should do so at the hearings or submit written comments to the City of Kenai, Planning Department, 210 Fidalgo, Suite 200 Kenai Alaska 99611-7794 prior to September 25th. For more information please contact the Planning Department at 283-7933. Publish: September 18 and 20, 1996. • Page 2 as. $2,000. S4 EXT Mach-Z LT 1994 X4,995 262- 778-7002. ~ ~~••~• ~•• •,___ 12' WESreHn f-~unernuNr 70 hp-, Ewinrude EFI, Mountain Cat, 1-1/2" 9031 w GUiCKWAY - With 15HP motor and trailer. 282.2878 , . trade, stln er, D&D Excellent condition. $1,900.00 WIWE DF R STS 9 power chip. eAtry ~, ~ Truck/ crane. 30 - 80' boom. - skis, 1700 '~ 20- ton ca a or trade? 283-2726. 18 I 1,200 miles. Great shape. , , s_E UI rnAnt ~e- ~; p city. All wheel Traller,'tygver, is start, ski $5,000 060.262-5279. drive. ~=-;3 Gas engines. 18' BAY RUNNER ` eMras to' list. ~4 Axe pries, 94 POLARIS 440 SKS 1962 INTERNATIONAL =' $15,000.00.907-272.5058, 35/40 Johnson, galvanized 280.3436, , t_8 Excellent condition. Less than Tandem dump truck, 6x3 ~ trailer. New canvas top. VHF ~a,,,;~~.1988 RI '-'- 1,000mi. $4,500 firm or part trans, air brakes, air tailgate. radio and all equipment goes 1g2M,;1/O, V8, c hand and trade for ggood running older 83,000. obo 262-4742 after with. $7,000.00. 283 7308• depth finder, rod snowmachlne. 235-2387. 'OOPm' `` ` ~ ~,„ SAWMILL 18' BAYRUNNER with cover. ' ~s, CB C - POLARIS 95 1972 HOUGH • Beisaw 40 circular saw. n-D, center consde, 35HP ant ill daytime 80-B Loader. 3 1/2 d. •282- $4000.00.778-8458. ~ ~~~0^• n 283-5479. XLT Special. Excellent condi- b394 y Suzuki. Caulktns trailer. 3248. .~.~ :, ~. tlon 150 total, miles, skid plate, `' ~~°' ` WANTED $8,500.00. 283-3411 even- ~ , 19' CHRY IRIS screen kit. Asking $5 200. Call 1972 INTERNATIONAL Wood Mizer LT40HD sawmill. Inge. `' ` 70hp Johnson 1, 'skis, SKS, after 4:00 P.M.. 262-3802. Tow truck, 4x4 dually, 1 ton. 262 7884- s~,+<, ~ ~ ~' Excellent ~,~ 283-9099 18 RINECRAFT w/trailer, Cabin, 0.00 OBO. 1992 POLARIS INDY 500 '° River boat. 25hp Evlnrude Runs excellent. Liquid oocled. Excellent condi- '` ~ KAISER JEEP short shaft. $2,500.00 OBO. 7005, 258-7981. IRIS tlO^• Accessores include hand 8x6, 8 c~ltnder diesel, Drott _ . ~, . , ,.. 778-8809. '' ` •1972 28' FlBI alf addle and thumb warmers. crane, 5 h wheel and 20140 :: 14' BOAT, MOTOR .Twin 130'diese p $2,900.00060.235-1388. trailer. Good logging truck. And trailer. $1,500.00. 283-A Prop drives, hydr 3LP heads, $8,500.060.282-6258.. and OBO. 262- 1993 COUGAR MOUNTAIN 4059. " ' more. $25,49 wk, Cat. Excellent condition. Low BACKHOE- CASE 5110D ` 'OREGON COMPOUND miles. Must sell. $2,800.00. Less than 2,500 total hours. Bow. 55. 70 pourtda, 29' draw ?a~~ IMMIT 670 282-8469. - Good condition. $19,000.00. length. Accessories included; , ,.. .. ~s, accesso- 235 1239. 8275.00.283-3079. >,200. Also -1993 EXT 550 EFI deep lug ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,~ . 262-9788 track, 1988 Z-440 only 296 r-. = ~ r miles, 2-place trailer. $8,000. : ~1: INVITATION TO BID , OURING 282-5319 ' ~ CITY OF KENAI 1983 EXT 550 EFl _ _ ~ 210 FlDALGO STREET '~ bells land Mountain Cat. Low mileage, r CITY OF K(ENAI 1 ~ ~ KENAI, ALASKA ` d machine. custom paint, excellent condi- ~ PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ~ ~ 98611 °, .7. tlgn: $2,800. Ca11262-4628." ~ - 210 FlDAL(i0 STREET, SUITE.200 ~ ~ ~(~'n 283-7835 ' ~~ tMK 1993 STORM SKS ~ KENAI, ALASKA 99811-7794 ~ ~ ~~ bids will be received for fumishing~of all new factory 1.5" paddle, track, SLP skis, ~ :. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE dale, and equipment for the constn~ction of the p ~s. Warranty V-force, reed valves, fox ~ ~` ~ below. Bids must be submitted to the Kenai P~ •,950. 262- shocks, DO pi $5,400. 776.1 The City of Kenai Planning anil'Zoning Commiss(on~will ~' 7505 or 778-6670. ~ ~ hold the following public hearings on3 September 25, 1998 at ~ ~ Department at the above address on or before 2:f: 7:00 p,m ' ` ~• tlme, on the date listed below. ttce ya ~~'"`"~~ ~ ~%~.z ''~ `~'~~'"~~:, ~ 1.An licatlon for an Encroachment Permit for side and ~ I PROJECTTiTLE: Kenai Beach Dunes ~~ ~`~' ~ j ~~' ~' .>f ~'~ ~ aPP y ~ PROJBCT SCOPE: -` .Move 78 concrete it • _ ' setback requirements for the property described as Lot 4, ~ P ®~ ~ ~ • ........ Block 1, Inlet View Subdivision; (425 Rogers Road), Kenai, ~ ~ 12 tons each, ',fabr )R ~T FOR THE STATE OFALASKA, ~ Alaska. (Resolutlon PZ96-61) ~: ~ .~,~aY ~;~ro AT KENAI ' ~ ~ 2.An application for a~Variance Permit for a, single- family ~ ~ • '..improvements, grid ~ 1 dwelling on a collector street in CG-Caeneral , Commerdal ~ ~ DESIGN ENGINEER: WlUiam J. Nelson & OF ~ . ) 1 ~ zone: for the property described as Lot 14, Block 2, ~~ ~ -PRE-BID CO_NFERENCE:.: September 19, f9s AME FOR:) 1 ~ Thompson Park Subdivision (285 Flreweed), Kenai. Alaska. ~ ~ a.m. ~ ~~~~i _ ~ ~ (Resdutfon PZ96-82) ~ : ~ - > ~ BID OPENING: ~ September 28, ~ 19: 9 °~ ) ~ ~ The Meeting will commerce at 7:00 p.m. In the City Hall ~ ~ ~ . _ , p•m• ~ "~~~~ ;name) ) ~ ' Council Chambers. Anyone wishing to present testimony con- I ' The sucxessfui bidder will be required to p. 6-49901 ceming these Rams should do so at the hearings or submit ~ State Wage Rates in effect at the time of CAr18trUc IG OF PETITION FOR CHANGE OF NAME' ~ written comments to the City of Kenai, Planning- Department, ~ ~ Percent bond is required: The Contract Docume ~ ~ 210 Fidalgo, Suite 200,, Kenai; Alaska .99811.•7794 prior to I ~ obtained from t he City of Kenai. ~ s:.": nge of name has been filed fn this Court by ~ ~ September 25th. For more information please contact the ~ ~ Keith Komi ES requestlng that Petltloner's name be ~ I Planning Department at 283-7933. , . ~ ~ ~ Department of F ~RYNA L. STILES BENNETT.. ij ~ PUBLISH: 9J18, 9R0 ' ^ 36261'211 ~ ~ PUBLISH: 9/10,11,12,13,18, ~23, 1996 =`r. mscheduledonthepefitlonasfollows: i L___________________„J L___________'__'.._._ 10,1998 ~ K~ ,,. ., ., ir------------------------------------- ' NOTICE OF SALE.` •longer applicable. The legislature repealed th ~. 5 Trading Bay Drive, Kenai, Alaska. ~ ~ STATE OF ALASKA provisions of Chapter .66 which hypoth tad ! ij ~ COMPETITIVE OIL AND GAS LEASE SALE 85A state has terminated the proposed ~ men- Dierdre J. Cheek ~ ~ (COOK INLET EXEM ~ Clerk of Court PT) which provided for PSL's. , ., . ~ ~ The Department of Natural Resources (DNR), Division of Oil Tract Deletions and Acreage Adjust U4, 11, 18, 1996 3600/1081 ~ ij and Gas (DO&G), gives formal notice under AS " Approximately, 2,417.15 acres within;Tracts E _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ J ~ 38.05.945(a)(4), of its intention to offer State and Mental 226, have been deleted from the sale due to ongr ( HeaRh Trust Lands for competitive oti and gas leasing in Sale in Alaska Superior Court involving s dormer lessee - ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ~ 85A, Cook Inlet Exempt. The 1,280 acres within Sectbns Sand 10 of T INVITATION TO BID , ~ SALE AREA DESCRIPTION SM, (former Tract 85A-173) has deleted IA HIGH SCHOOL - POOL FlLTER ~ ~ Sale 85A includes 234 tracts with an area of approximately Bureau of Land Management's to rescin~ be received for this project at the Office of ~ ~ 1,062,600 acres, and is located. within the Kenai Peninsula Land Trust's tentatively approv,"~ o^• actor, Kenai Peninsula Borough, 144 N. 1 ~ Borough and the Municipality of Anchorage (MOA). Upland The state reserves the right tract acr tna, Alaska 99669, no later than 2:00 p.m. ~ ~, acreage is generally located on the western side of the Kenai time up to 10 days prior to the_ ~ delete whc sd :lobar 10, 1996 __ ; ~ ' peninsula between Pt. Possession a d_the,communities of --tlme ~ to• and indwdt ~ ~ sale• n ~ P-.. n9..; . isi. fiirnishing~all-IeboF=meten'als•end ~ Anchb' PoFrt~aiid Hoiiaer, and onphe;twa~trsStJe-ot Cook Iq~le~ advised that 4Fie~ are sole ble for assn ace..u~e .Pxieting pool; fifer at- f he, -Sq(d"otna ~ ~ between the BeCt~a'Rive~ aitd T'axedni-BeX,~~e sale area aisoi--pet-acre-banus bid submi ~~ ate' ted~ at 425 W. Marydale "Ave., Soldotna, ~ consists of state owned tide and submerged lands in central the total acreage within the: ~e~tlnte of the Inca with the requirements of the contract ~ ~ Cook Inlet, and Redoubt, Trading, Tuxedni and Chickaloon Sale Terms ~~~~~`~ •bid conference is scheduled at the facility ~ ~ gays. The communities of Anchorage, Hope, Nikiski, Kenai, The bidding method for ,„ y . ~ ~ cash tx aptember 25, 1996 at 3:00 P.M. Attendance ~ ~ Soldotna, Sterling, Ninilchik, Kasilof, Homer, Clam Gulch, with a minimum aid of $5 per a,;,, • Leases issued c ference is strongly recommended, but not I ~ Nikolaevsk, and Anchor Point as well as the native villages of as a result of this sale wilCfaVe an)rtitlel Primary to ~ ~ Knik, Tyonek and Salamatof may be affected by activities (7) years. Leases issued OR Tfuat I•a~ will ha subject to the provisions of State of Alaska, ~ 'resulting from this sale. primary term of five (5) years. Leases issued or Wage Rates. Contract will require certifi- ~ -EXEMPT SALE Sala asa states anri Tn~st Land, will have a fixed r