Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-01-10 p&z packetCITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION **AGENDA** Council Chambers, 210 Fidalgo January 10, 1996, 7:00 p.m. Chairman Kevin Walker 1. ROLL CALL: 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 13, 1995 December 27, 1995 4. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD: 5. CONSIDERATION OF PLATS: a. PZ96-2, Subdivision Plat Approval-Airport Lease Property, Norville Replat b. PZ96-3, Subdivision Plat Approval-Misty Haven Subdivision, Replat of Tract A c. PZ96-4, Subdivision Plat Approval-Richka Park Estates 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. PZ96-1, Conditional Use Permit, Katmai Hotel, Halfway House 7. NEW BUSINESS: 8. OLD BUSINESS: a. PZ95-58, Warehouse Subdivision b. Comp Plan 9. CODE ENFORCEMENT ITEMS: 10. REPORTS: a. City Council b. Borough Planning c. Administration 11. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED: 12. INFORMATION ITEMS: a. KPB Planning Commission Agenda for January 8, 1996 b. Fax to Continuum Corp c. Reappointment Letters 13. COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS: 14. ADJOURNMENT: CITY OF KENAI ~ "-% PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION .MINUTES December 13, 1995 Chairman Walker opened the meeting at approximately 7 p.m. New Commissioner John Booth was sworn in by Ms. Kebschull. Mr. Booth was welcomed to the Commission by Chairman Walker and other members. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Carl Glick, Phil Bryson, Teresa Werner-Quade, Ron Goecke, Kevin Walker, John Booth, Karen Mahurin Members Absent: None. Others Present: Councilman Hal Smalley, Jack La Shot-City Engineer, Marilyn Kebschull Administrative Assistant APPROVAL OF AGENDA: PHIL BRYSON MOVED FOR APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AS SUBMITTED. MOTION SECONDED BY RON GOECKE. MOTION APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS CONSENT. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: KAREN MAHURIN MOVED FOR APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 21, 1995 MEETING. MOTION SECONDED BY RON GOECKE. Chairman Walker asked if any amendments or changes to the minutes. Mr. Bryson stated a reference in the minutes to the south property line regarding Bailey Subdivision and the intent was the west side. Walker asked what page it was on. Mr. Bryson withdrew the comment stating he may have been mistaken and it was in the Borough Planning Commission minutes. VOTE: GLICK: YES WERNER-QUADE YES BOOTH YES WALKER YES BRYSON YES GOECKE YES MAHURIN YES MINUTES APPROVED. Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes December 14, 1995 Page 1 OLD BUSINESS: Comp Plan Update-Kebschull advised that the original disk had been found and a decision had been made to make the changes within the document. The plan has been reprinted. It still lacks the library information. Kebschull advised she is in the process of proofreading page-by-page and hopes to have it done by the end of the year. Walker asked for comments. Walker asked that the draft be brought to the Commission for review. Kebschull advised that administration would like to purchase inexpensive, flexible, three-ring binders for each plan. Then, next changes will be able to be placed in each section as an addendum. The way that the plan was bound originally the changes cannot be put in place. This will make it easier for future reviews. In addition, a list of plan holders needs to be maintained so that changes can be sent to them. At this time, a list doesn't appear to have been kept. Walker stated the segment on the library is before the Commission and asked for comments. Walker stated he had one comment. Under goals and objectives, a concern of whether or not library hours need to be increased Monday through Thursday and consider Sunday hours. Walker stated there had been a tremendous amount of discussion about this by council over the years. Walker asked if the Planning & Zoning Commission wished to leave the statement as is. Mahurin stated she didn't feel it was Planning & Zoning's place to determine goals and objectives for the library. Mahurin added she thought that the Commission's goal was to relay each Commission and Departments concerns to the Comprehensive Plan. Mahurin stated she felt that was what had been done and added she felt that was a management prerogative and not a Planning Commission prerogative. Walker stated he did not agree that this was a city prerogative. Walker stated that council sets the hours. Walker stated he will accept the Commission's recommendation if they choose to leave it in the document. Walker noted the document will be forwarded as an item from the Planning & Zoning Commission so it will be the Commission's choice whether or not to leave parts or all of it in the plan. Walker noted it seemed as if there was a consensus to leave it in. Bryson stated he assumed the document would go to a public hearing and public comment would be received prior to it's adoption. Walker stated he was not certain it went to public hearing but went to council for approval so would go through public process. Bryson noted that the Planning & Zoning Commission did not have the last word in drafting the document. Goecke stated he concurred with Chairman Walker's feelings on the hours. Goecke noted another number he was questioning was the 12,500 people on the current registration. Goecke commented that they must have everybody's name on the list who had ever taken out a library card. Goecke commented on the population of Kenai being 6500 or so. Mahurin advised she had asked that question and was advised that there were library users from surrounding areas and cannery workers. Goecke questioned them leaving cannery workers on the list and noted it made the library look good; however, he does not believe it is a viable number. Planning & Zoning Commission December 14, 1995 Minutes Page 2 Bryson commented on increasing the library hours that the library is already open from 8:30 a.m. to 8 p.m. Mahurin stated that information was from the current plan and she doesn't know what the librarian's intention is except it wasn't revised. Councilman Smalley stated he would be glad to bring a report back to the next meeting as far as the current, up-to-date, active users to the library. Smalley noted it is a very high number and there are more outside of the city than are residents of the city using the library. Walker stated he would tend to believe the 12,000 as active card holders; however, how often they use the library is another story. Walker again asked if the Commission wanted to leave the goal information intact. Smalley recommended that their goals not be adjusted without discussing it with them. Glick stated that whether we agree or disagree with the goal, it is a goal of the library board and a lot of the other departments had goals that he didn't agree with but they were not changed. Walker asked if the information came from another commission or was it copied out of the current book. Mahurin stated she worked with the librarian on December 8th to update the information. Walker asked if there were any changes or adjustments. None noted. National Flood Insurance Program~Tack La Shot stated there was information in the packet concerning the National Flood Insurance Program. La Shot reminded the Commission about the FEMA people who had presented to the Commission earlier in the fall. There is a sample ordinance and resolution with some of the requirements highlighted. La Shot stated he wanted the Commission to review the information and give recommendations, comments, etc. so that the information could be passed onto council to get the process started if they should choose to do so. If council decides to get involved, La Shot stated he believed that the administration would begin the process. Walker asked for discussion. Walker stated he thought the question in most minds is if there is a fiscal note attached to the program. La Shot stated there is nothing monetary. It will be a matter of putting it into our building inspection program and enforcing it. La Shot stated the Borough is finding out that something needs to be done. They have been in the program a couple years and since the flooding they have found out what needs to be done to enforce it, and there is some liability. Kenai probably has a leg up on the Borough because of the building official that would review building permits. Due to the limited developable area in the city, the city's exposure will probably be minor. La Shot stated there is a large area within the flood plane and hazard areas as they define them. Most of those lands are publicly owned and we can pin point the areas that do have a problem such as Angler Drive and possibly Barabara. Some land away from the river along corridors of drainages may be involved. These are mostly no name creeks and Beaver Creek. La Shot stated that if this goes far enough he will recommend that the city incorporate not only the flood insurance maps but try to work in a flood hazard study that was done by Soil Conservation Service a few years back. This shows inland drainages. Planning & Zoning Commission December 14, 1995 Minutes Page 3 Glick stated it was his understanding the city would be making a new flood plane zone and then it would follow the building code as outlined. La Shot stated the city would create a new ordinance like the example. The areas would be defined either by elevation or simply using the FEMA map. Glick stated the expense would be creating the ordinance and the building inspection program. La Shot stated it would also involve monitoring and there could be some liabilities there. La Shot stated most of the work would come before actual building, as to whether it was in a flood zone. Councilman Smalley advised that at the last council meeting there was a presentation from residents of Anglers Acres, and had the city had a program in effect, those homeowners could have had insurance programs that would have allowed them to recoup some of their losses. One of the things they asked was when is the city going to involve themselves in the Flood Insurance Program so that they can be afforded protection. The Mayor had advised them it would be a discussion item at this meeting. Smalley stated he was surprised that there were not people in attendance in reference to this item. La Shot stated it is hard to quantify the city's liabilities for not being involved. Bryson referenced Kristy Miller's letter, next to the last paragraph, "the city may want to consider more appropriate standards such as set back standards on erosion prone lots." Bryson stated the erosion prone lots that are being discussed are river erosion and not bluff situations. Bryson stated he felt that would cause critical input to this. La Shot stated he felt the other bluff property could be included because of the proximity to the coastal area. Bryson stated he felt people in the city may be more sensitive toward this, because it can effect a lot of small lots with set backs on bluff properties. La Shot noted that people are starting to make buildings a little more movable. Bryson stated he would interpret this for now as being hydraulic erosion. Walker stated he felt it should be noted that under Section 1.4 they list a number of restrictions and that under these restrictions there would be virtually no development in places like Anglers Acres. Walker stated that one believes that if we are going to have these kinds of restrictions rather than worry about flood insurance, by restricting use of the flood plane, we can strictly obviate the use of that and restrict use in the flood plane if that is the intent. Walker stated he personally feels this is a backward way of placing greater control in the flood plane. Walker stated there are some people in the flood plane for this and some against it. Walker stated he felt that was why the last borough ordinance failed. La Shot stated it does limit development in the flood plane; in fact, it pretty much prevents it unless it is protected or the construction is lifted above it. Walker stated he would like to see a flood plane map before the Commission to view the properties being discussed. Bryson stated he concurs that the Commission should review a map before making any decisions. Walker asked La Shot if it was his intent that the Commission take a careful review of this item. La Shot stated he would like to pass this on to council with the comments as they are, and should they want to take the matter further, a sample ordinance will be prepared, public hearing, map, etc. Then, further comments can be given. La Shot stated he wanted a few more comments for council before it was sent to them. Planning & Zoning Commission December 14, 1995 Minutes Page 4 CODE ENFORCEMENT ITEMS: Kodysz Home Business Letter-Walker asked if any further comment on this item. Kebschull advised that the certified receipt had not been returned on the letter. REPORTS: City Council-Smalley reported on two meetings, November 22nd and December 6th. At the November 22nd meeting items discussed included: Bids on two patrol cars, transferring up to $10,000 for moving expenses for the new Finance Director, transferred $10,000 to pay for the Challenger Center study, logging beetle kill trees on city properties, the state gave final approval on Glacier Environmental clean up at the courthouse, and Southcentral Air is in business at the airport. Smalley advised there was a meeting last Friday with the legislators to discuss the upcoming legislative session and city's goals. At the December 6th meeting the following items were discussed: Mr. Coghill gave the city's financial statement, residents of Angler's Drive petitioned the city to form an LID to place structures below mean high tide to prevent further erosion at an estimated cost of $200,000, transferred money to repair Christmas decorations transformers, grant was approved for the signs in Old Town and the Shkituk' Village, transferred $8,000 to City Manager for increased transportation expenses, a heavy duty ambulance has been ordered to replace the ambulance which has 75 to 80,000 miles on it, open house at the library on December 14th, work session request from Townsite Historic District Board for January 23=d, possible taxing of pulltabs, bingo, etc., approved assignment of lease for Budget Rent-a-Car transfer at the airport to Bonnie Koerber, Kenai River Boardwalk funding by grant, grant to protect the dunes, the new well being completed, and a possible ordinance for an alcohol and drug testing policy for city employees. (Smalley advised Commission of the federal law and how it would effect the city.) Goecke asked why governmental employees were different from private sector employees. Smalley advised that is how the law is written. Walker asked if this was state or federal law and Smalley advised both. Smalley stated that council had asked administration and city attorney to draft a policy and bring it back to council. Walker asked if the new ambulance will require additional floor space at the fire hall. Smalley advised no and that the old one will be stored somewhere else in dry storage either at the airport or one of the buildings where sand is stored. Walker asked if this equipment could be for staffing and equipment at a fire hall by Thompson Park. Smalley advised that could be possible in the future. Werner-Quade asked why the city police and fire staff would not be subjected to drug testing. Smalley advised that state and federal regulations exempt them. (Discussion on drug and alcohol testing and who the law applies to.) Planning & Zoning Commission December 14, 1995 Minutes Page 5 Borough Planning-Phil Bryson reported that in the packet Item 12F contains the minutes from the November 13th and 27th meetings. Bryson stated he had previously reported on the November 13th meeting. On the 27th, items specific to the city were four plats. One of these was Bailey Subdivision on Lawton Drive. Borough Planning Commission saw fit not to incorporate the city's comments on the plat. The plat was approved as submitted. A meeting was held last Monday night, no items were specific to the City of Kenai. Addressed an item that had stretched over three meetings. There had been a petition to vacate a road that was shown on prior plats on MacDonald Spit the other side of Kachemak Bay. Bryson explained this is a lot where the petitioner had requested to have the trail shown across his lot be removed from the plat. He individually had constructed alternate access and indicated a pedestrian easement. This created adequate access across his lot but neither end of it tied into constructed access. It was not deemed to be appropriate to vacate the commonly used trail. The developer of the subdivision had not constructed a trail he was supposed to have but apparently through the publicity and one court decision he decided to finish the project. He completed the trail in the last two weeks. The Borough Planning Commission approved the petition to have the note removed from the plat. Bryson commented that the Homer Assemblyman has proposed an ordinance setting up an advisory Planning Commission for Kachemak Bay. This would encompass over 200,000 acres. There was some concern on the Planning Commission to have an area that huge under one Planning Commission. This would be from Kachemak Bay to the Anchor River area. There was a request from the Commission to limit it to the Fritz Creek voting district. That will go to the assembly as a recommendation. There is also a request to have a Commission set up for Grey Cliffs area. Administration-La Shot noted the Old Town and Shkituk Village signage grant will be completed and in the mail by the end of the week. The well tests have not been received back and should be received any time. Walker asked how deep the well was. La Shot stated 420 feet and screened from 350 to 400 feet. Walker asked if this was a six inch well and La Shot advised twelve inch. Discussion on how deep the well was screened. INFORMATION ITEMS: Work Session-Shkituk' Village Site--January 23, 1996 at 6 p.m.-Walker asked the Commission felt about this work session. Walker noted that he is out of town half of the Tuesdays of each month, he may nor may not be able to attend. Mahurin stated she may also be unavailable. No other Commissioners noted any conflict to the scheduled work session. Kenai Habitat Restoration and Recreation Enhancement Project-Werner-Quade commented that she was happy to see this project as she had attended a work session in this regard. She noted that this is a very fragile habitat area. Planning & Zoning Commission December 14, 1995 Minutes Page 6 COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS: Mahurin welcomed Mr. Booth and wished everyone a Merry Christmas. Councilman Smalley welcomed Mr. Booth. In addition, noted he would be out of state and unavailable for the next meeting on December 27th but would try to have someone cover the meeting for him. Chairman Walker welcomed Mr. Booth. ADJOURNMENT: Meeting adjourned at approximately 8:30 p.m. Res tfull submitted: Marily Kebschull Administrative Assistant Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes December 14, 1995 Page 7 CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION **AGENDA** Council Chambers, 210 Fidalgo December 27, 1995, 7:00 p.m. Chairman Kevin Walker 1. ROLL CALL: 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 13, 1995 4. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD: 5. PLANNING: 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. PZ95-61-Variance Permit for Signage-Seventh Day Adventist Church 7. NEW BUSINESS: a. Special Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting 8. OLD BUSINESS: a. Tidelands Lease Application 9. CODE ENFORCEMENT ITEMS: 10. REPORTS: a. City Council b. Borough Planning c. Administration 11. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED: 12. INFORMATION ITEMS: a. KPB Planning Commission Action from December 11, 1995 meeting b. National Flood Insurance Memo to Council c. Term Letters d. Meeting Calendar & Deadlines for 1996 e. Town Meeting Memo 13. COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS: 14. ADJOURNMENT: UNAPPROVED CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DECEMBER 27, 1995 MINUTES 1. ROLL CALL: Members Present: Carl Glick, Phil Bryson, Kevin Walker, John Booth, Karen Mahurin Members Absent: Teresa Werner-Quade, Ron Goecke Others Present: Councilman Hal Smalley, City Engineer Jack La Shot, Administrative Assistant Marilyn Kebschull, James Grizzell, and other unidentified citizens 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: PHIL BRYSON MOVED FOR APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA AND REQUESTED UNANIMOUS CONSENT. CARL GLICK SECONDED THE MOTION. AGENDA APPROVED BY UNANIMOUS CONSENT. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 13, 1995 Chairman Walker asked that approval of the minutes of December 13, 1995 be postponed to the next meeting as pages appeared to be missing in the copies supplied in the packet. Walker asked if anyone opposed. No one opposed. Minutes to be on next agenda. 4. PERSONS PRESENT SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD: 5. PLANNING: 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. PZ95-61-Variance Permit for Signage-Seventh Day Adventist Church CARL GLICK MOVED FOR APPROVAL OF PZ95-61. MOTION SECONDED BY KAREN MAHURIN. Chairman Walker asked for staff comment. Jack La Shot stated that the only additional comment is that this sign is similar in size to one that was existing prior to the Spur Highway project. That sign was non-conforming and since it was removed, the code says you cannot replace anon-conforming sign. That is why the church is requesting a variance permit. Chairman Walker opened public hearing. Mr. Grizzell stated the church would like to have the variance approved noting that the sign that was taken down was the same size as they one they are requesting to put up. Mr. Grizzell noted that this sign would be lighted but that the other sign had also had lighting. Chairman Walker brought item back to the Commission for discussion. Karen Mahurin asked if this was a different sign than the sign that was taken down or if this is the exact sign and they are just asking permission to put the sign back up. Mr. Grizzell stated it is a different sign but it is the same size. Grizzell noted the old sign was eight foot wide by ten foot high and the new sign will be eight foot high by ten feet long, it will be turned sideways. Mahurin asked why the church wanted a sign that large. The pastor of the church responded for visibility so that people driving by can see it. He noted that when he first became the pastor that he missed the church several times because he did not see the sign. He continued noting it is a nice sign and an improvement and that the church would like to be recognized. Chairman Walker asked how far a distance from the road the new sign would be placed. Mr. Grizzell estimated it would be 30 to 35 feet from the actual road bed and 8 to 12 feet behind the property line. Grizzell added that in no way would the sign obstruct any view for traffic traveling either way. Walker noted that would be his concern to make sure that the sign did not in any way obstruct traffic. Grizzell added that the bottom of the sign would be approximately four and a half or five feet off the ground. John Booth stated he seemed to recall reading in the code required that the sign be placed by the city building official. Booth noted he thought that was under section 180. Walker asked if La Shot had a copy of the code. Booth stated that section 180 is the variance code and section 220 the sign code. Booth read under paragraph 7, "The building official shall determine the area of all signs and classify all signs." Booth noted that this may not describe who will place the sign. Booth noted he was incorrect. Walker asked for further discussion or comments. Phil Bryson noted he had contact with the city office concerning interpretation of the area and was told that these signs are not specifically addressed in the code as most items are not. And, administration was interpreting this as being an 80 foot sign with two faces. That was the same area as the prior sign. Bryson stated he will be supporting this permit. Karen Mahurin stated she will be voting no because she believes there is a sign ordinance for a specific reason. Mahurin noted that if it were the same sign that was taken down she would view it differently but she has a problem with the fact that they Planning & Zoning Commission Page 2 December 27, 1995 Minutes are reconstructing a sign with new dimensions. The ordinance does not allow the sign to be put back up. The difference between 32 square feet and 80 square feet is significant. Mahurin reiterated that she would not be supporting this permit. Mr. Grizzell commented that the sign was the same size as the original sign; however, it would be laid on it's side. Chairman Walker stated he understands and shares Commissioner Mahurin's concerns. Walker stated his concern is with the code as it is written and as the code has not been adapted to provide for signage along the Spur Highway in this particular zone. Walker stated he still has a major concern with the amount of setback as it is approximately 30 feet from the highway. Walker stated if it were a greater distance from the highway he would probably support it. Jack La Shot stated that as far as visibility the sign is behind the property line and noted that he estimates a full car length between the property line and the sign. La Shot noted he doesn't think visibility will be a problem. Phil Bryson noted two items concerning the setback. Bryson stated he doesn't know what side of the center line of right of way the highway is being constructed to noting he suspects it is not the center of the right of way and it may be to the south. Bryson stated it is approximately 80 feet from the sign to the edge of the driven surface and he didn't feel a four by eight sign would be adequate to be seen from that distance nor could it be read. VOTE: GLICK YES BRYSON YES BOOTH YES MAHURIN NO WALKER YES MOTION PASSED. 7. NEW BUSINESS: a. Special Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Chairman Walker stated the question before the Commission is, "Will the Planning & Zoning Commission approve the scheduling of a special Planning & Zoning Commission meeting for January 16, 1996?" Bryson stated that will be a busy week but scheduling the meeting would be okay with him. Mahurin asked if the meeting would be at 7 p.m. and Walker advised yes. Chairman Walker questioned if there would be a conflict with the use of the council chambers. Councilman Smalley stated he did not believe there was a conflict but Ms. Kebschull could verify that with the city clerk. Smalley commented that this item had came up at council and that council was Planning & Zoning Commission Page 3 December 27,.1995 Minutes going to first of all request that the Planning & Zoning Commission change their meeting to that night. Smalley stated he had commented that he didn't think that would be a good idea and after further discussion the special meeting was discussed. Smalley noted that when the discussion took place the rest of the council was present and they are members of other boards and commissions and no conflicts were noted. Walker noted that if a conflict arises that perhaps the meeting could be held in the library conference room. Meeting scheduled for January 16, 1996 at 7 p.m. 8. OLD BUSINESS: a. Tidelands Lease Application Ms. Mahurin asked Chairman Walker if he wished to deal with each lease separately or as a group. Walker noted that would be up to the maker of the motion. Walker noted that the business was entitled "Tidelands Lease Application." Walker advised Ms. Mahurin before answering her question he would like to ask administration to explain the question on the back of the packet information. Jack La Shot noted that the report from Kim Howard explains the situation and that the only question before the commission tonight is if the use falls within that permitted under the zoning ordinance for anon-zone in Kenai. La Shot noted this has historically been fished for years and years. La Shot added his personal opinion is that the use does fall with that permitted in a non-zone and a similar use as allowed by other agencies. La Shot stated that the Commission did not have to discuss who may be leased the land, that would be up to council. Chairman Walker asked Ms. Mahurin if her question was to deal with these separately or together. Walker asked if she wished to deal with them together and Ms. Mahurin responded yes. KAREN MAHURIN MOVED FOR APPROVAL OF THE INTENDED USE OF THE PERMITS UNDER THE ZONING ORDINANCE. MOTION SECONDED BY PHIL BRYSON. Walker asked if there were any further staff comments. None noted. Walker asked if anyone in the public wished to speak to the item. None noted. Phil Bryson reiterated La Shot's statement that the code is essentially silent in the area requested for leasing and also the proposed use is one that has been traditional for many years in that area. Bryson stated he will be supporting the motion as he feels it is appropriate. Planning & Zoning Commission Page 4 December 27, 1995 Minutes Walker stated he had one comment noting he does not like the formula the city utilizes for the lease applications in these areas, he does fully support this particular use of this property. Walker added that he felt it was in the correct zone and he will be supporting the motion. VOTE: BRYSON YES MAHURIN YES WALKER YES BOOTH YES GLICK YES MOTION PASSED. 9. CODE ENFORCEMENT ITEMS: 10. REPORTS: a. City Council Councilman Smalley noted that the Commissioners had a copy of the agenda in their packets with notations on it. Smalley stated that he had a report from the library showing 12,811 actual, active card users. The library has over 14,000 cards out. October use of the library itself was 7,368 and November was 6,014. Walker asked if these are different users or repeats? Smalley stated that all were different and he had a copy of the report showing where the users reside, etc. (Report given to Walker.) Walker asked if Smalley happened to know how many square feet the library is? Smalley asked La Shot who stated he thought around 17,000 but noted he was guessing. Smalley reported that James McCubbins a student from Kenai Central High had spoke to the council. He is working on his Eagle Scout project. This was going to be done a couple years ago and then was postponed. The council is going to assist with an amount not to exceed $1,000 for a sign on the north end of town. Dick Hultberg spoke to council on whether the city had ordinances concerning the placement of advertisement flyers on windshields in parking lots, etc. A great deal of garbage results from these flyers. Smalley reported that the administration will be recommending an ordinance before too long dealing with this type of advertisement. Under resolutions, Items 3, 4, & 5 were tabled. Item 3 was tabled because it was felt that the city would have been making electrical outlets available for some of the employees at the airport at city expense when in fact there are some electrical outlets Planning & Zoning Commission Page 5 December 27, 1995 Minutes at other parts of the airport terminal for airport employees at lessee expense. The city did not want to create a situation of supplying a service to some employees at city expense. Smalley reported that there will be power in the shelter being built for the airport manager and other city employees. Resolution 95-80 dealt with the highway project and it was tabled for a rewrite. The project list sent by the state identified a lot of different highway projects that are ongoing as Kenai projects when in fact they are from other areas on the Kenai Peninsula. Smalley stated the Keith Kornelis will be contacting the state and properly identifying the locations of these areas. In addition, regarding the prioritization of the projects, resolutions will be developed requesting several projects be given priority number one. Smalley gave an example of the pedestrian/bike trail being a priority one and yet the widening of the road is listed as a priority three. The fish initiative was tabled and will be brought back on the 17th. Smalley stated there was a concern about the proper allocation of the fisheries and the document will be rewritten. Councilman Smalley noted that under New Business, Item 5, Alaska Municipal League membership dues had just about doubled and had risen from around $900 to almost $1900. Smalley added that this is a phase and when it reaches full development it may cost as much as $6600 and is not sure that the council will be willing to pay that amount. The Department of Health & Social Services Health Center lease was approved. Smalley noted that the city will be encouraging DHSS to develop other space for the Health Center. The center has 1147 square feet leased. Council held a discussion about policy change for use of Leif Hanson Memorial Park. Smalley stated that administration is to develop a new policy for types of events that should be held at the park. If food is served, those functions may be held at the park strip corridor at the ball park. Smalley noted the concern being that some past functions have had a large number of people with children who climb on the memorial plantings, trash, etc. Councilman Smalley advised that the council chose not to act on participation in the National Flood Insurance. Discussion by the council concerned Item 1.4 which talked about potential restrictions on development along the river corridor. Council also passed a resolution regarding Anglers Acres for the state to help stabilize the banks in that area. Smalley added that during discussion of the flood damage it was stated that damage was more a result of erosion than from the flood itself. Chairman Walker asked Smalley to explain this. Smalley stated that the reimbursement for damages that the city had applied for through FEMA were the result of erosion. The damage on private property in Anglers Acres was probably a combination of erosion and flood. Smalley explained that when the water was high it eroded the bank itself and the Planning & Zoning Commission Page 6 December 27, 1995 Minutes bank dropped off. Smalley added that the flooding of the river occurred more on the upper river. La Shot added that the flood had accelerated the natural erosion. b. Borough Planning Phil Bryson advised that the Borough Planning Commission had not met since his last report. c. Administration Jack La Shot commented that the newspaper article regarding the Spur Highway project had been misleading and that the current project will be completed. La Shot added that some other projects have had their prioritization changed. 11. PERSONS PRESENT NOT SCHEDULED: 12. INFORMATION ITEMS: a. KPB Planning Commission Action from December 11, 1995 Phil Bryson explained that this was a situation wherein the plat had not been filed and the surveyor requested additional time to file. Jack La Shot noted that the city routinely receives these reports from the borough and in the future they will be included in the packets to advise the Commission of borough action. Bryson added that the borough approves all plats for one year and for that for approval to stay valid an extension must be requested. Bryson noted that unless there has been some major change in the right of way in the area or a need for a change, they are commonly approved for an extension. a. National Flood Insurance Memo to Council b. Term Letters Chairman Walker encouraged Commissioners to contact the City Clerk with their response to the clerk's letter. a. Meeting Calendar & Deadlines for 1996 b. Town Meeting Memo Planning & Zoning Commission Page 7 December 27, 1995 Minutes 13. COMMISSION COMMENTS & QUESTIONS: Ms. Mahurin stated she would urge that the council be prudent in supporting resolutions for commercial or sport fisheries. Mahurin stated she felt the city should remain impartial. Regarding the Leif Hanson Park, Mahurin stated that the Kenai River Festival, which was a large group, was a wonderful use of the area. There was food and the next day the park was clean. Mahurin stated she would urge the city to look very carefully before amending policy as to who would be allowed to use the park. Smalley noted there is a statement in the policy that the administration may approve activities at the park. Chairman Walker asked that prior to the next meeting that the P.A. system be repaired. Walker noted there is a high frequency noise that is very disturbing. 14. ADJOURNMENT: CARL GLICK MOVED FOR ADJOURMENT. MEETING ADJOURNED AT APPROXIMATELY 7:45 P.M. Resp ctfu y Submitted: Marilyn Kebschull Administrative Assistant Planning & Zoning Commission Page 8 December 27, 1995 Minutes STAFF REPORT To: Planning & Zoning Commission Date: January 3, 1996 Prepared By: JL~mk Res: PZ96-2 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Integrity Surveys 605 Swires Drive Kenai, AK 99611 Requested Action: Subdivision Plat Approval Legal Description: Kenai Spur-Airport Lease Property, Norville Replat Existing Zoning: General Commercial Current Land Use: Commercial ANALYSIS City Engineer: This property is airport property that is leased. Tract B-1 is the location of the Dairy Queen. Tract B-2 is proposed to be sold to the Diary Queen lessee. Sewer is available; water is not. No installation agreement is needed. Building Official No building code requirements. Kim Howard. Administrative Assistant: This property is leased by Peter and Val Ischi, d/b/a Kenai Dairy Queen. At your April 26, 1995 meeting you discussed the concept of dividing this property and had no objections. The City Council discussed this issue at their May 3, 1995 meeting and had no objections. RECOMMENDATIONS Approval ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. PZ96-2 2. Plat CITY. OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION Nt3. PZ 96-2 SUBBIVISION PLAT A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI RECOMMENDING THAT THE ATTACHED SUBDIVISION PLAT BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: WHEREAS, the attached plat Kenai Spur-Airport Lease Property, Norville Replat was referred to the City of Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission on December 28. 1995 and received from Integrity Surveying ,and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission finds: 1) Plat area is zoned General Commercial and therefore subject to said zone conditions. 2) Water and sewer: Sewer is available; water is not available. 3) Plat does not subdivide property within a public improvement district subject to special assessments. There is not a delinquency amount owed to the City of Kenai for the referenced property. 4) Installation agreement or construction of improvements is not required. 5) Status of surrounding land is shown. 6) Utility easements, if required, are shown. 7) Any existing structures must be shown on plat. 8) Street names designated on the plat are correct. 9) INCLUDE STATEMENTS ON ATTACHED STAFF COMMENT SHEET. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI THAT THE KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE KENAI SPUR-AIRPORT LEASE PROPERTY, NORVILLE REPEAT SUBJECT TO ANY NEGATIVE FINDINGS AS STATED ABOVE OR ON ATTACHED STAFF COMMENT SHEET. PASSED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, JANUARY 10 , 1996. CHAIRPERSON A ST: Planning Secretary I-,, GG OE ~ ~ ~ 1 ~~ ~ - u =`c ~ ~, ~ ~ ~~~ u ~ 0 ~~ Q z ~~~ ~G~-U~ II ~ `_ ~o t N > ? v E~° ,~ n rs~ z o ,~~n N~ O ) .~. Q ~ _ OI N ~ a tY "' o v a' 3 0 ° o n ~ ~~vv ~n m N 3~ a ° v w _ ~ o s - n:=' ~ o o n r _ _ v a ~; _ ` L " - ~, a " ~ ~ u ~ c ~ N 4 ~ _ o a _ o i N 3 v G -` ~ ~ i 3 C oa cv ~ u °v a °oL E o ~ z rJ M O ~ ~ r LL' ~ J p tl I N O way /~~ Z 2 iI- , = ~ ~ ~ W , j w ¢~n v~~ ?- p ~ w p a ti ~ r /~ ~ 'T'a a ~ y l m ~ il Z o~oQ LLoQ Utx pU a tLLL S F- ~3 p z ~pJZ Q Z w a 3aN > > w Om _ (~l orZw m 3 0 ~ p V O V W W w a w J Q Z W ~~ j ~ ~ Q T} O d 3~~0 N ~~°-.a J = Q~ p m Q ~ ~ Z ~'- LLmza =x"I _Na VZ ~Zp I.JJ woOm3 `~ OS VFa J ~ S r~jd'fn p' Z V w0 mQ- ~ xU pW p Z a om r- ¢ m ° x rw l . za wxwa= 3/103r- ow 3p~ ~~ .\ L~~~~ 0~4~ °~ o ~ iaJ Lam, (~~~/~)~ S~/~ ~v "J" 2`~ o ~ ^^~ L~ l~ ~~ Q i ~„ - Z %~ )~ /G i~,l ~Y ~/~ ~ /~ % ~ vy ~' ,r ~~ O Z a Li r v n ~, o a ~ QI d J O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~I W I ~I Y ~ Q v I _ ~ r. Q o !-I p , W m 1 ~~ J - 2 r~ Z J ~ Ji _ ~1 11 N O X - - 'm ~ a ~ Q !- p a Ili W V C a a Q< - O m `k (J ~ min 3 p L m C Y g a a w U Q ~ ~ ~ ~ m vmi ~ o >- ~z ~ - W ~ u _ a I i m `~ o, . - ~ ~- Z E II i2 `` o ~~ ~ W 'I oVI tc. ~ m ~' '~ n r r., ~ ~ ~ C/7 ;, d ; ~. c'3 0 ` ~- < ~ i ~ ~ p~ z a _ I ~. ~y '^~ N ~ Q_' 4 ~ Q ~ i. = Y cn w ~ 7 ,~ '~ y r° ° Y I ?'L ` 'n ~- M ~,~ r V ~ ~ o y ~ ~ ~ Y ~ C ~ ~ _ w T' ,~ m ~ Z o ~ ~C W~., I ~? ~ `~ Z ~ _ 3 Y C~ O ~~. ° O N ~ Z __ C _ ~ x Z I c a a ~Ya ~I HILL ~~~\ ~ ~~ ~ i~q`~~ S - `- ~o ~. ~ -~, ,~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ f j- n~ oa \ -- '~a o Y ~ / ° Y (~ ~ p ~ ~ ,e,, t 1 ' d ~ . C ~~ ~ l o" i ~ __ . GG ~~~'' r` ~ r c~ ; ~ / ~ ~a P~ j ~ ~ , y ~ j ~ /~~ ~ ~ ~~,\ ~ ~~ ~ O~ ~ ~ j ~ c 3 /, ~ /~d~6' c ~ ~ ss` ~`~O O' • ~ / j / i rn ^V a j ' -~i7~ ~6~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ j•.p ~~ \ / i ~' ~ . ~~ ~ v ~ ' 7~p0 ~ \ ~ 0~_ !G d \~~S . ~. ~;? J~ \'\7 \~~~, ~^ ~/ o~ O ~ L ~~ "J V oo~ rs- M J cJ ~ a Ci c ~' ° `~ ~ ~ N9 ~ :' eaa~ ` 0° J~ ~'~. ~U ~~~~;~ ~ O j ~,~ O a`~ `~ \~ ~~,1s~ ~~ \\ ~?~r~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~3 ~CO rZ~' - ,S~ ~pC' ~ti" :, - tiV rnl i ~ ~ `I N rn ~ ; > W P. w> >- W ~ mm~N J G I ~Nwa ~ ' ;n~3< C ~ i W~~- ~" ~~- oW~nz ~ I a~ W~Ow p ~ 5 ? O S _ w~ ~~~, ~ ~~ , s O ~ I~~ ~ J ~i vgno'' _''-a ~ _, ~ °., a ° ~' ~ a ~ ~~ _ m v~ o ~. ~~ n~ ~ o:o vI o~~- o-ov s t o r _~`o - m°`' I ~C; _ _,. = ;~N ~ = c ~a ~ v - ° Eo ~ iEoa m _ ' .t. O y W Q a - m v D ` ~ ~ Z o v a _ d O W ~ rp _ ~^ ~ ~ p C p v .i " - ~~ S Y _1 j m o o a ,~ ; , __ s. ~ ~ - c - ~ I oa .1i o , o iv ~ J ~' uJ ~ ~ O J4 A1ll11L STAFF REPORT To: Planning & Zoning Commission Date: January 3, 1995 Prepared By: JL/mk Res: PZ96-3 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Integrity Surveys 605 Swires Drive Kenai, AK 99611 Requested Action: Subdivision Plat Approval Legal Description: Misty Haven Subdivision, Replat of Tract A Existing Zoning: Suburban Residential Current Land Use: Medium Density Residential ANALYSIS City Engineer: Lots 1-5 of this plat subdivide an unsubdivided tract. An installation agreement is needed. Recommend aproval of the 50' right of way for Misty Haven Circle. Building Official No building code requirements. RECOMMENDATIONS Approval. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. PZ96-3 2. Plat CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING GOMMISSION'' RESOLUTION NO. PZ 96-3 SU$DIVISION PLAT A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI RECOMMENDING THAT THE ATTACHED SUBDIVISION PLAT BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: WHEREAS, the attached plat Misty Haven Subdivision was referred to the City of Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission on December 29. 1995 and received from Integrity Surreys, and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission finds: 1) Plat area is zoned Suburban Residential and therefore subject to said zone conditions. 2) Water and sewer: Available on extension. 3) Plat (deer) (does not) subdivide property within a public improvement district subject to special assessments. There (is) (is not) a delinquency amount owed to the City of Kenai for the referenced property. 4) Installation agreement or construction of improvements (is) (+s-r~et) required. 5) Status of surrounding land is shown. 6) Utility easements, should be shown. 7) Any existing structures must be shown on plat. 8) Street names designated on the plat are correct. 9) INCLUDE STATEMENTS ON ATTACHED STAFF COMMENT SHEET. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI THAT THE KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE MISTY HAVEN SUBDIVISION SUBJECT TO ANY NEGATIVE FINDINGS AS STATED ABOVE OR ON ATTACHED STAFF COMMENT SHEET. PASSED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, January 10 , 1996. CHAIRPERSON A ST: Planning ecretary ID'- >~`- Mua iaAO :N ~ (~ O " BOO)°d, ° r z 1 0 ~~ L ° n ag _J wa°N w~ z zz 1r Ir a lnz a d o`z a N '_o ~ a~~N Nn z ~ n "~ n aoJw W ~~a J xv1 ~ ~ W ~ O ~ O N ~ (~ ~ imams N ~ UmY ~ o O m ~ W G '' W Wn~a Boa L7 J Q ~ + ` N n ~' a0o oa ° ~ ~-- N-f-o Z r-oZ In J ~ O~ a P ~' O Q W a W 4 ~ O m N_ v ~ W- ,~` C~ FT ~ z W Q~ O ~ OpOO w CVO Z`// W 5 ~ y ~I I7 \N Rll ~ „1 'o .n - ~ ~ Q J ~ w m S Q In 3 ~ 1 U w ~ w ~ W o ~o~ v '~b ~ ~oz4a ovlm za Q o W ~ r Y .L -D ~ - W~ F 1- 6 m W ~ ~ /~~ / Ll ~ ~ ~ 1- 2 r, Swmw f- ¢¢ 0 LNQ (~ ~ Z 0 Q N ¢ ~ .~ ~ j W ~ ~ a F CJ~11 ~ ~ FN VZ W ZJ3 FZZ [rQQ ~ ~ Z Z to F' a J _ w ~ oOm U NS= w1- V Z V ~~ Q O JO N 4 3 Z Vt ? p r Z 5 a N aoo ~~ N L m~ W ~ J o '^ W a w m Z=Q~ mzln ~ F'Ow~ =~ o V W N ro Q V n ~ 3 V1 r = K Z O O N m n r ' z N~ = ~ 2 Y _ i03ti v ~ O~ i ~ ~ r - o~ _ v~ Eo3i ° o c o W !/~ C p O D _ T O~ 'j « O ~'v .. Eao u m n c nwb ~ ~ L - O y " ° ~ E o~' c a cn o O m - n ~ lil v !-^ ., .. ; r a ~, a u ~ ~~d v a ~ o c E - O o o n L > 4 ~ CO C O O ~ a' ~ $ ~ o '~' o c _o w o .~ a '- acn o N a s a a U O VI ~- M O~ i D `~- C _ U ° ~ -or ~ a- % ~ O O ~ O~ U ~ M r Y ~ > i r O .~ i. d m 3 vav v ~ ~ r ~yw a~ u 0 0- L L ~ •- mN ~ y °~ O ~ my a y V ` L V ., m ~ %'; ~ E o v c ~ o ~ "oEu w oEd `o~ v n v o ~o ~.y oz-~ ~ ~ ~o a~ ov~~ (n v 3 •~• E ` `. W rn u°'~~ 1- o~ ~v'so Z ~ N ~N ~'r,, V m o+ O MO~~OG~O~~GtI~ ~ao~~r~~~~r~oo~~Q~~oa / ~~ I v / ~ ~~ oO © l1 ,N ~ `/y O O `~Il O lorp~ J .. n J , tr6 IF1 11 ^^ vJ a (S~ -1~ ° m ~ o ~? 1 ~ m .n 0 T N C6 °' --~ ao v~ LY ~ ~ ,00'08 `ice ~ ~ N Do 0 Q a ft i 1 V vV a N o ~ ~ ~ n~~-~~, 0 ~ o N ~ ~`~$ o ;°~ z~ 9 a 'L~ }~"/~ n ' ' z jy6 * _ fir ~r- 'u'- ° 3 ti ~ ~ Q O l ~ ' ~ i ~r Do = Vi ~ 1 ~ (~ a° I.a O' O' O ry w N o ~ ~ ,OCZ6 .LO~LOI _ ,1C66t 3,OF,OO,OON M n ~ ~ au~7 Z~a2~l~~Ll~ ~ ~, ~- I~w~ °r,q~~T~,~~~ a~~ ~ ~ ~ 1 b a~ /'~ ~`'~ J /~~ 2~ ~ ~ ~ _ \~~ ~~ 1 z W ~I ~ ~~~ ,OF O ~.~ V R~ \/ V U i°° J ~ d o y. V ~ ,lO•. ~, Y o u N ~' dI v i ^ VJ Y v y <O W ~ Z ~ N ~ ~ ° u _o ° Y Q Q X ,. .~ U °O~ (~ N d ~~ W ~ 5 Z3 > « o U Q j m ~_-~ 3 c ui ~ (/1 w O~ O ° 3 c Y ~- M .~,, S ,, ~ a ~ yZ ~ ~~ ~ six Q d Q Cho ~ -ti,r~ < « M.g o o ~o F- W (n z~~ ~ a ~`- ~ p u W '~i O N P V C ~ ~ CO p ~1 v~ u c N Z ~ c Q Z K U ~ N ~ .os ~~ rj~'~J ~ 1 ~I2 • ~ 01 N ti~ Z ~I r_~ ^~ ,OS I~ I H N p ~ ~ °~ y W rn w ti ~ w >~ m~°N ~ oN~^a ~ ~ ~~~a O I I ~w ~C°NQ W ~ W ~ a NZ 4~ W O W ~F K?!OY ``P* ` ,',1f ~ ~ ~ ~, , i Q ~ m ^ i % i ° ~ I~ ry ~ z o v ¢c° o 0 ° - °- o E N c ~ V r 111 1 C h U r ° o ~~ ° s o Q ~a-o o.. U °oE~vS o c O 9 ~" U U'- ~ Q ~ T ~ y W ~'N ~ O O U U L ° U . (n On.~n L a ~ O _ L y° }. v o s `o W ~~Es° T~ i ~ ~ p ~ `- o H ~. ~ o° E n o U y C ~ u O ~ ~ ~ o ~ o` °~ m L °gY-N o - a .. o _. v, w ~ o ~_ o t ~~ ~__._ v .. ~y c o. V j L I N I I O n I j ` .... J Od° J c. (~. O °v °v ~" oat ~a ¢ tr ~a vo ~ c Q ~ oa 5'a oa z J ~ • O ... ~ ..,_ STAFF REPORT To: Planning & Zoning Commission Prepared By: JL/mk Date: January 4, 1996 Res: PZ96-4 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Integrity Surveys 605 Swires Drive Kenai, AK 9961 1 Requested Action: Legal Description: Existing Zoning: Current Land Use: ANALYSIS Subdivision Plat Approval Richka Park Estates Rural Residential Medium Density Residential City Engineer: Richka Park Estates was previously submitted to the Planning & Zoning Commission in early 1995 as a fully platted subdivision. The area is zoned rural residential and is classified as medium density residential by the Land Use Plan. This plat designates only two tracts. No installation agreement necessary. Building Official: No building code requirements. RECOMMENDATIONS Recommend approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. PZ96-4 2. Plat CITY QF KENAfi .PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLIJTIDN NO. PZ.9&-4 SUBDIVISION PLAT A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI RECOMMENDING THAT THE ATTACHED SUBDIVISION PLAT BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: WHEREAS, the attached plat Richka Park Estates was referred to the City of Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission on January 4, 1996 and received from Integrity Surveys ,and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission finds: 1) Plat area is zoned Rural Residential and therefore subject to said zone conditions. 2) Water and sewer: Available 3) Plat does not subdivide property within a public improvement district subject to special assessments. There is not a delinquency amount owed to the City of Kenai for the referenced property. 4) Installation agreement or construction of improvements is not required. 5) Status of surrounding land is shown. 6) Utility easements, if required, are lnot) shown. 7) Plat verifies that no encroachments exist. 8) Street names designated on the plat are correct. 9) CONTINGENCIES: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI THAT THE KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE RICHKA PARK ESTATES SUBJECT TO ANY NEGATIVE FINDINGS AS STATED ABOVE. PASSED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA_ JANUARY 10. 1996. CHAIRP RSON ATE :Planning Secretary aa~~ zS ~~a ~ aFa I r~ ~ c 5 ~ ~ R w a ~ al- I~ ~ ° Z ~ g n o o ~~ <~ ~~ N z a .~i =N< ° ~ 9 ~ ~ ~' cr~`^ a _ ` ~Y - `v 'eon"=~ a~ ~~ ~ d z -- ~ ~°_ ~?, °-,-, o GIs f- E ~ a ~ I- o ~ ~~ o m F F~4 <hm ~ ~ a ~ ff Y ~ m ~j \= w° a m ~ (~ ~ I"-w In I l cr w °~J~ -~ FEE ~ '~ ' s -C ~Q ~ ~ Z~O ~ a z O ~ O a z ~ U F' ~ ~ ~~ ~~b:~ ~ _~_ ~. . : ~ q a 5 ~ ~I ~' 57 P~ ~ ap__ a' ,__ \ _ ~ ~ - ' -- ', -_' - ,~ €§ d ~' II ~ I i I; , ,~~ ~ ~ , \ u =~ -' ~ 4 _ __ _ _r` Q ® ~ I ~ ~, _,--_ ___ ~ , ~ i ~ it « ° ~ ~ / tlP ~ , a ~ I ~~ ad ~-_ d e5 ~ w ~ I aoca Izsl l~ tzn) ~ _ ~ I ~ .ov ~~ -+ ~~ I ..b.. ~ I ~' 1 J a~ Maol~l a z ®!A~ ~}dC~~y'f ~ y ~"s ~ ~. 3 ~ $~ 2~ 2~ 2;; ~ ss _ LEI J ~ ~F' ~ ~ ~ .. J m w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ^, Ft r a ~° d ~ d ~ J°' ~ a I -d ~~/ ~I~I .~~ ~aa~ H ea~pepaop~w~ ~dmOfP®®/~p w ® rp d 3 ~ ,~ • ~ „~~4 ~ a QS ~ ~ ~ n ~ ;I S ;~ o ~~ .c~ Nr8 ° ~5°=€„ I~ ~ I o ~ a ~ ant.iq ~ ' °Sa `~so e- __ ,~ e ~ ~ t-e a E: [~ ~ `h J~ Lc~a."S I r~,i3^>~ ~` ~s ^=z .« ~_ a `:6' ~ ~sa ~a o Ie ® _ ~ > ~ a ~ "fig P - ~ ra ,a ~~ ~ h =°€~^:a ~ ^`~J i~~E~a ~ Evbeea ~. E ~ o m viq dqJ b r ~ ® ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ _ 5 Vii= E.L ,E YS' spa $ _ s; E:5 o E~6s .2 83 ~ V o5e = ~ -$a eP5 ., a ~^a = 5 ~ ~ w ~a 6gY (~(~ qk ~o 4 @ O ~ ~. a. Z ~ rv E d I'a 3'8 STAFF REPORT To: Planning & Zoning Commission Date: December 22, 1995 Prepared By: JL/mk Res: PZ96-1 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: JIM C. SINGREE/KATMAI HOTEL 10800 KENAI SPUR HIGHWAY KENAI, AK 99611 Requested Action: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Legal Description: LOT 1, ALYESKA SUBDIVISION, PART 3 Existing Zoning: GENERAL COMMERCIAL (CG) Current Land Use: COMMERCIAL ANALYSIS City Engineer: The applicant wishes to utilize the upper level of the Katmai Hotel, 10800 Kenai Spur Highway, as a community residential center (halfway house). It is our understanding that if the Conditional Use Permit is granted, the bar will be closed and the area used as an activity room. The applicant does not, at this time, have a contract with the State of Alaska to provide this service; however, if the Conditional use Permit is granted, the applicant would hope to have one. Past history has shown this issue to be very sensitive within residential zones; however, no applications have been submitted for locations within the General Commercial Zones. This location would seem more appropriate. Building Official The applicant may be required to upgrade the building due to the mixed occupancy. RECOMMENDATIONS Recommend public input be weighed heavily. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. PZ96-1 2. Application 3. Drawings CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 'PZ 96-1 'CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI (GRANTING) (DENYING) A REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR JIM C. SINGREE/KATMAI HOTEL USE COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL CENTER LOCATED LOT 1, ALYESKA SUBDIVISION, PART 3 WHEREAS, the Commissi ~dl: ~ " 1) That an 'ca ion meeting t ments of Section 14.20.150 has been itt d and receive ecember 19 1995 2) Thi re st is on land zo neral Commercial CG 3) Tl~t a applicant has o strated with plans and other documents a hey can and will t the following specific requirements and c ditions in additi existing requirements: a. b. 4) That a duly advertised public hearing as required by KMC 14.20.280 was conducted by the Commission on: January 10, 1996 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI THAT THE APPLICANT (HAS) (HAS NOT) DEMONSTRATED THAT THE PROPOSED COMMUNITY RESIDENTIAL CENTER MEETS THE CONDITIONS REQUIRED FOR SAID OPERATION AND THEREFORE THE COMMISSION (DOES) (DOES NOT) AUTHORIZE THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICIAL TO ISSUE THE APPROPRIATE PERMIT. PASSED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, JANUARY 10, 1996. CHAIRPERSON ATTEST: Planning Secretary } CITY OF KENAI CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NAME [ N~ (' G PHONE -- /' d MAILING ~ O~CS CJ ~~K~, ~ ~''~` ADDRESS ...~ ~, '- ADDRESS Q-~ ~-- LEGAL ~~~ ' ~ DESCRIPTION Gt ~ ~ ZONING C RR RR-1 RS RS-1 RS-2 CC CG IL IH R RUl DISTRICT Section 14.20.150 of the Kenai Municipal Code outlines regulations which allow Conditional Use Permits for certain developments. PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING, COMPLETE THE BLANKS AND INITIAL THE SPACE BEFORE THE ITEM TO INDICATE THAT YOU HAVE READ AND UNDERSTAND THESE CONDITIONS. A Conditional Use Permit issued by the Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission is required for some uses which may be compatible with principal uses in some zones if certain conditions are met. I understand a conditional use permit is required for the proposed development as describ ed: /~ ~te lv~ vti ~ H i -lT~,e -~>d ~~~~ C,~~ °~=t Y p Please submit site Plan, Map (if available) and Traffic Flow & Parking Please submit plans showing the location of all ~~ existing and proposed buildings or alterations, elevations of such buildings or alterations, and data as may be required. A Public Notification and Hearing is required before the issuance of this permit. A $105.00 non-refundable deposit/advertising fee is required to cover these notification costs. (Please see attached sheet). - An approved conditional use permit shall lapse twelve months from the date of approval if the nonconforming use for which the conditional use permit was approved has not been implemented. The Commission may grant a time extension not to exceed six months upon a finding that circumstances have not changed sufficiently since the date of initial permit approval. A request for extension must be submitted prior to expiration of permit. A public hearing shall not be required as a condition to granting the extension. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS : ~~ ~7 .~~ ~ C~i o ~, ~~ . ~ ~/'~~ Applicant Signature: ~ Date: /~- / _,~ Approved at P&Z Meeting: Approved: Chairperson Attest: Zb aged 56000 'oN al!d Cti dI ~ J d~ ~ ~, .~ I O -J ' 3Y~vo~ L ~}~ ? ~ i I } p c~ -~- - - 'J , 4C O '~ ~ aC ~ ~ ~ I d ~ ~ ci T J ~ ,~ ~' I _. _. T _.._ . s ~ ~ .°~ _ ._.. ~ ~ r ~ _ .... ~ i oI ~ _ ~ ~~ .. L ._ ~ -~.~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ I i~. _ ~ .a _ ~. ~ ~ ~ Q M lf1 ~ _ . ~. .,~ ~ ~ .°, `~ `-~.. I _~_ i- '~ O ~ I- - Il- ~ . _L_. ~ ~~~ v o ~ ~~. ~ ~i ~ ~~ i - I- i ~~ ~csss 8~s~1M nennyr~;y anpg iEUa~ 00801. H~13~IS JNIal1f19 ~''"~~+1 '~ tuaae~~;sa}~ ya~o~ 6~ua~~~ S3~1/1 ~J3$ 7 b'Sl b'tldd ry 031d/1 F/3~ b'~/S tY~J b' M ~. ~ ~ / Q W ~ N w ' t M ~ r _ ~ ... _ M g ~. .~ ~~: ~a. o o _ i o a - w . - - --- ~ . ~ ~ - ~, `o e •d Y ~ O da ~ ' ~ doo co ~ • •~ N ' s 3 .r. ~~ .,. ~. - ¢~ ;,. A: ~~..ti 2 ~" ~~ ~ ~ w ~~~€ F- ,~ .. Y / Y ~1 • ~~ / }`' O ~ i V ~ ~ i. N M / ~ O ~ -` Z ~ .+ ~ ~ . / . / ,..~ > / ;~ t• y ,~ . w `w •w i 5 ct ~ O ~ f C 4 ~ °3 r 1 ~ l ~P ~ ~ ~~ / ;~~~ ~ ~ Ny ~~ ~ -. ~~~a~ .M x ~~ ~ =oY M ~ E t ~ a, ~. .~ y ~ Q t~ I ~ .} ! l~l '' •i '. Paae 33 JI'I Il-V7-7V IVG V~~Ji f1-I1~1"I 1.1'11"Ii~fIV IGG '7 V1 GOJOi Vi - r.1Oj ~~.CHJE~ v , ._ .. iZ ,. ~Q ~ ~'r ~ ,!~;.. KATMAI M~tsl • Restaurant • lounge ,r 1/ I 10800 Kenai Spin Hwy. -Kenai, Ala9ka 99611 907-263-6101 t ~ V' To: Zoning and Planning Committee Jan. 9, 1996 Kenai, Ak 99611 Dear Jack, Because of noncommittal action from Dept. of Corrections/Division of CRC (half-way house) on minimum offenders, with no further documentation, we hereby withdraw. our bi.d on .the project. We furtYaer request no action on our Special Provision Permit. It was our understanding going .,into the project that it was to be a DUI-release progxam. According to the Bid Pack, there ..were 5 serious types of offenders, We are .not in any position to impact our .business any .more than we 'already have. The outcry .was just to massive, Sincerely, r/ .~ ~ Jim Singree Katmai Hotel Kenai, Ak. 9961T ~ ~, ~~i ~~ ~ ~~~~; c~~ ~ o0 cr . n ., i ~.~~yp,~ %S , ~ ~ sue'/ /~ ~~,~ ..~, ~- c~ c.~- ,~,~ i .~ z 73leed s~ ~«..G.a~`....G ~. ~p~~- ~ ~Gf~y„, C!,,,~[~ ~~,/Y~~~~~ ~~la /796 ~ ~~- -~ ,73°~ ~`~~~i~O ,~~- ~' ~~`'.. _ _ JHIY-tl7-7b I Ut tlL :4~ F'RI JUF'11Y. laClYbtL 7tl f LbL fL4.~ frY ... 101 `-G ~ /~ I M / ~ ~~U z~ (~y~c..~~crS~t ~ itip c~ ~Ja-C~'ur~ c~lau,~e hrc~,f u~. e~~,~+-a.~ el~zurrl~tcsi l~c<~a~. ~t~,u a Palzec.~ o~rte 3 lLrc% l,~ ~ ~ OJT ~~ ~-~ GaJ= e, , C~ u_ c~ p(sad' -~12a ~--{1ic~~~ rio ~9 Ce~~ct,F'C3~/ i~C~ ~-¢ C' ~ZZ ~~ a ~~c//v-~ au~~.,G~e~e. dK W'~ ~ er~Qf~ aR3 s8~i99G// January 9, 1996 To: Planning and Zoning Commission Re: Proposed halfway house at Katmai Hotel I would like to be put on record as opposed to the idea of locating a halfway house this close to the Kenai Rec Center. This is not the kind of influence our kids, especially the teenagers of this community, who choose to use the rec center need. Also as this will be next to the fitness trail it seems even more inappropriate. Having this facility in the back yard of a large day care center seem almost incomprehensible. thank you for your consideration. Thomas Rhyner 505 Robin Drive Kenai, AK 99611 Phone 283-3943 .~'A, '// ~w ~~ JAN-09-96 TUE 01 C51 Pf'I JOHN GENSEL 907 262 7245 P. 01 - - _... .` ~~ 1 w~. ~ ~~~~ a~~ ~~ ~C~ ~ ~~ ~ e`c1~ce.~ `c.~. ' ~. ~ CQ~- .. ~f 1 e,~ Ct CtY> 1- ... `~J _ . ~o `'J ~~ ~~ ~~~;, ~~s~~ #~ "~ ~~n~ -Z~~i~ JNIY-b7-7tr 1 ~.rt na-G°F r rr~ Bunn ~,nnac~. ;,~q r coc rc~ra r. ni ~d~[i.rd ~ 11'0.r- ~~ ~ r~ ei~ ~e-h a% ~ ~t1~ 9 9 b 11 c Q ~p °~ ..~'~-n ~ -fin ~-~. ~ ei,~.~~ ~i ~ia,.-, '~-e~ ~f ~ ~2C.c, .~~~ -e ~~- ~ r ~a w ~ ~a ; '' e8~ a~' ~~~szt~~dt, ,.irin-nom-moo ~ ~+c na : •+~ rr~ J1..11"IIY V ,__ 7f7 f CbL (G~FO Y. 101 _i Q' .~nQ,,r 0~'' ~'h~ lard-~ 5~~ ~v ~9 c- 4'~ ,, ' ~ ; ~' ~ hove ~ ~'3 ~ 1-_09-~ ~.e ~,~ eta ~ . lL; r~ . ~5 ~~ S- ~~e5~ ~r a°a ~~z q~t~~ ~ ~y~,~sgfeg~c ''~~ ~ /,~N 19,q~ ~ ~` r g~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~'~Z~tzz~~'~w 101-b'y-177b e4 ~ »rr i r Kur I rul-inrv i nun rl5ocaa 1 rvu~ I u FAXED TO: PLANNING S~ ZONING, COMMISSION aco.~.~r~i~.- r. r~l CITY OF KENAI 283-3014, (FAX). . RE: COMMENTS AGAINST HALFWAY HOUSE AT KATMAI MOTEL. THIS NOTE. IS TO EXPRESS MY 06JECTION TO A HALFWAY HOUSE AT; THE KATMAI MOTEL LOC~ITION. I OBJECT TO FELONS, PEOPLE CONVICTED pF A MAJOR' CRIME LIVING RIGHT IN THE CENTER OF KENAI. THIS LOCATION ;IS TOO CLOSE TO SHOPPING AREAS WHERE MANY YOUNG PEOPLE GO., I DONT . LIKE CONVICTED CR~MINALS IN THE HEART OF KENAI. THE LIBRARY, THE DAY CARE CENTER ARE ALSO TOO NEARBY FOR A HALFWAY HOUSE TO BE ALLOWED IN THIS AREA. . MARY L~JPE~ RESIDENT,OF CITY QF KEI~P-I i I ;. ; YY1a~l~~~ C~dc4hesS . ~ I f a ;Box 7 3 ~7 '~ _ ia~ . ,,. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ; N ~ ~ ~~ ~ .P i E ,. ~.e I • i. ' 1 1 ~ I i 'i :II ' ~ 1 I I I I I TOTAL P.01 ~0'd ~d101 .~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~; i .' January 9,196 City of Kenai 210 Fidakgo $t. ~ Kenai, Ak. 9961 Dear Plaxiuxang & Zoning Commission . Re; Halfway ;House T vv~quld-like to express my opposition of the Conditional Use. Permit fo this facility. A short time ago tb~is same sort of permit was applied for and was met with ovewhehmiing disapproval by the local community. Currently the City of Kenai has a very desirably atmosphere, one to. be proud`of, as evident in 1991 when it received as award for the "All American. City." Credit for this type o~reicognition goes to the .City Planning & Zoning Commission, City Council . Menbe~s,1!/Iayor John Williams, and to staff employees for a well planned city. Together, you ; have. made ~enai a city to be proud of and an example for others to follow.. I would like to ~ . encourage everyone to continue with the consistent decision making that has made Kenai a fine ~ ' city, and. urge this body to vote against approval of a Halfway House. A~ Ha]~cway House is like half way: panning. i 1 I' Thank you ~fo; the oppontunity~ to comment. Sincerely i '. ~' I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ntl.~ ~~ LG~i i Daniel A Conetta ~ . ;~ ~~ i I i i . ~~~ t2,~4~ ' ~" - °~, . . ~A ~ ~, ~ ; ; ~- w~ ~ ~~~~ rra•.a r~rraccs~~~ nl ~c~1Ni~~~S4H/~'INTNNH1rl LJfI?I-~ Wr19Gi:S~I 9F,FiZ-F,GI-S0 JAN-10-96 WED 01:06 PM JOHN GENSEL ~ ~ 907 262 724b P. 01 Jo w~ ,~ m ~,~,4 I~I/9G ., ~ /U~Ci~.2, /Yj1.t/ p, ~ ~ ~u j~ Q.c of eft e ~t?in~,iaiwrC -~&-C«,~o~~ Cad /~1Ld-tai! a~ c3 ~C/u. mimic., ~r~vta/ o9a~~ ,~O~arytt c?a ~28~.L r-2 ~),~~~~~ ~/G6o .~~i~ccct~a~u ..io ~y~g~ L:C~2fZLNjD~.~.~R. O.G/~G e~EP/l7.Ck.[. !CX c ~liK.~ ~ C~~4(~L1.`[. ~Ld~ ~ ~.~.~i~ .lJ'tac.Q ~ 772GYIC G~'Cd~ G~ ~ ~tU ~-u~eo/ .. ~ l/ Gfi~:u 1 ~a ~zoac,ac .~s+- ~ua ~Zaq,~ U ,,co„l,1~„djaa,~iG-G~, , Y~ .ct~h, -~tuJait,~~~~A v~~~4 y~no-G-~rv ~t,~ .,~iv)'t~yt?R~ y0d'~er~Gt~x~ /~t~ ~. C.vtca- .,~, ~l~ce ,aux., t..' ~,.~%X;pe,~„Ze. C~!w~ar~.vx~ ao wtiuc~a..aa~cc@te.--.,c~`.h~,__o~,.c«~_~a~s .._ ~ ac /yl s, ate!. ~a y~ ~cu.~n. _r.L~~m, ,acvt~c. ,',a w~:r r l .wow.~l .~w~!-.._c_!~a~cz_~...,c lc~r~ ~...-ua,G ._ -- .... _ ... S~-~la. a Lw~d ~a~c~otlta U~,! ,~toL a.o ilr1~.,,~C~cs.Q..`~ ~x~~cGt~O____e?o.~tgq,i~,~ .~...Pii~btvia~}. Btu, G~ x~..~! ..~~7.I2L.c_''Y_~4? tl,.r.~t~ii_.e._ JAN-19_96 .WED b1. :9f I-'I'I JUH14 latlYStL ~n r coc r c~r.~ r.. nc W ~~ ~~lla~' e~ ~l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~,,~ u. c~e~~ su=m S'~ ~n~~ F v ` ~ ~u ~ ~~ ~9~ ~~- ~~~ ~~°-~ .~ ~ f~ ~,~art Pry ~ Uvy~,vn~. ' ~fl ~ ~~~ ~~ /~~~ ~e ,rye ~ .,~~ ~o /~~n~ ~}~l 9~l l'~i '~ ~~ ~~00`7 ~ ~7CQ 1 '~ ~~ '~ ~~ ~' JAIL-1V-~O WGL V1 •iV r1'1 JV1"11`1 VGItiJGL _.. 717f LOL (L"'F .7 ~"~•b~ I ~ 12.~3'~T~ ~, , ~~ 1~ t 'rOr~''"ad`' '~- ~,~, ~ ~~~~ ~ C~~~ J ~...~- ~J ~~ ~ ~ ~ .~,"'~.~ ~- r ~ A ~ A 1 , 'h.~..e~ti ..~.yc~~- - ~`' a- ~~ y I ..~•~ a''~`''~'y` _~ e- ` - ` 1 .~' `~- ,~ ~~ 1r~cs ~-~' ~~ ' ~~ 1 aaa-s~g~ . v ~ ~-~ J V1711 .a~~»c~ ~n r coc r c~r~ r.106 ~~~ w \ ~e p„v. ~ , ~ ~ w y O~f'ose L~ ~,~~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~rt' w c_ y ° U s ~ 5 s~ G I oSe. '~"v l.,! ~ ~ e ~' o~ ct ~ ~c~ a. ;./ c `, ~ ~ a r.~ fr-~ ~ C~ L t ~ f 2 v1 y~01112 7.~ ,~ r F.~'1-'ti ~- e ~~`'~~ q ~~ ~ ti ~+ ~v ~'P~rt~z~~Z~ ~ ~v 96 C~,,,,.~„, t..~ ~o.~.-~ x-~tC cs.~o~.e-acv ~av~ ,Q.ew.~.o w, ~o -~.ec y ~.° ..a~ ~ ~ -may ~?~9~'' ~- 1~~1p11'!2'3~~~s 1Pb~ ~ ,6' ~ ```~~~ 1~ ~ N ~" m t dM~'~i~- ~' ~, _~^! '~ ~~~~,y ~~~d ~T ~yvrCtr~ ('f ~c PD~~/Lc; }-,~vx /U,17rg~i (/ ~G~ u f~ ~~~~~~~ ~u~ ~~~~ ~~ a h -~~ c' _ ~ . ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ?~/ ~p u~ ~a~za~ ~ s~v ~~u~ ~ ~°p°~~ ~G~... ~~~, ~~i ~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ee,~9~o»~2~s~~~' ~~ ~~~~~1 v ~ ~~ p ~ ~ r m a ~~4_ .~~ /~ LL' n 114-4(, T , K;mbe.ly Co~~e and m y hum' ~'eo~ge C0~1ie, s+rong~y oppose eden the slgh/est SuygPSN~n aG' a hal heuse,in fhe hPa aP ~fe~zi, ar~d r~esf dPS„a~°iy ~o~ near ~(lhfie. /hy ('hi~'0~'Prx+'s ~Ye-bC/xibl CceafioePlay). Z Clm Comple-kly hors /r'rd by ~%s ~dP0.. 1 do ~~we ~e eh;~d•er-, of Ci~°a~-liv~eP,`+-y V~iM/q' be ~f In ~~~~/~irsalty. ~~,-may, ~~~~ ~~ .~ ~ ; a ~0~ z~~~~ y n Ll,~, //1 /99f _ -- - -- - =..r..:.: .... ... .... ... ~.~v~~. 717 f LbL f.L 4.7 1~~©,~ ~-~~.~9 C ~~ ~-;,~ ~~~ ~ ~.o ~~~ ~~ c,~-~e ,1, w G.~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~~ ~L~ G-H.,~~' key; '~~, ~~~C~ c~;1~~~ ~~ ~,sl~~. ~ib~ ~o~;~ tae ~ ~,-~ ~ a~--d~ Road'. ~~- ,~ -~~ ~. ~~~~ N J~ p N +~~' N ~ ti" w !~~'sZaZtZ9~~ti~~ ~~ ~~ P. 04 ~; ~~~-~-~ --=~~, -tom ~ ~ ~. ~:~~P ~~-~ Sato Ce~~ ~ ~ ~<~NA~, /~k R ~ m ~ ~ fF -w~~/ ~D`Js~ v,(o wUt S J~~ 7~' ~ -f~Qt2 a/' e ~atC' iv ~ h P/1° 1t/ ear Q '~ a~f~ A,O1~112 ~~ 74'n,~~,a w~-Y v •• k ~ 1996 N ~~G v~~e~eQt. ~ G~ o~O~ \ Q~~~ t~,/n''~ G VV JA •VJ r1-1 JVfIII VGIIJLL 7V'1 LOG ILYJ r'~bj ' ~ ~-q ~ ` ~ J ~~ s ~ ~ ~o• Gc~.yc'~, ~~ ~~ ~~` ~ '~~ s JAN 1996 Recsirsa ~ ~ ~~ JF1.1`1-iL7-70 -WCL nG :J7 rl'1 JUI'71Y lat1Y `J GL 7,10 f ,"L6Z ~Z45 ~ P. 01 1~'1 ~~n ~ ~~~ ~r1~ ~' ,.~ (,Ul u~d ,14,Q.~~2~1~ ~ 7Z~ .: b ~h~~. ~~ ~o. ~k 7~~ 1~~,0,,,2,3,~~s ~~ ~ ~,~ sc~; ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ R '~~ v ~a~ 996 ~, ;~ A~ ~ci ~ coc ~ c-r ..i ... r. 171 ~v: 1' ~- ~ r~.~~,o-a.~ =- ~ ---~ ~$~ ~ -~'~ ~~ ~ ~~ N J~~ ,~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~r.a~v~.c.~n- 7~~, aoy s ~a,,.~.~- ~~Ll K..~,~.~~. , -412 ~~ ~• ~ ~ n + r~ AvtiC~ l~J ~~~ ~b ~ 1 ~-~^ti s!e-w..~e~ ~~o<-sd -tom "~-V..a, t~-J~~~ Q~ .JU.~ CC~SL~L~tL~, ~h~~,.~1 L.2 `~~ r~,.,s~ ~.~I ~sz. C~~ ~e.. , ~~l `~ ~QUQ,~I vas. ~~0.~e1 ~o cSa~~.. t~ `-C1~ c~o~ ~tA wok- ~ , . ~~ . ~~~ ~~~ ~~ ~~"' 4ab~ I'~ a~3~ ~bg y 1-10-96 City of Kenai 210 Fidaigo Ave. Kenai, Alaska REc Conditional Use Permit For Halfway House conversion of Katmai Hotel TSear Punning and Zoning Commission 1Vlembers: ~e hereby request that this conditional use permit be denied under the following Sections: i d.Z0.150 Conditiona,t Uses (b)(1){i} Such use is 1~iOT similar to principal uses already permitted. (b)(1){fi} Such use :.will NQT be in harmony with the intent of the zone. We hate spent a great deal. o time and money in developing a firxt class child care f acilit on Lots 3 ~&4, Block 4, Fidalgo Commercial Center. The _ ~suance- of this conditional use. permit. will adversly affect our child care ~coperties and will create a serious burden on us as property owners. I .cannot think of any looatton more inappropriate to place a halfway.. house than next to a .child care center or school I will be very surprised to find the community of Kenai supporting this .absurd .idea. Hopefully you will place _the safety and security of the community at the top of your list when dealing with ail planning & zoning issues. Thank you for your time and troccble. ~ ~~ _ ~' i ~ ~ ~.j ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~-~o-q~ -, ~ : QI (Arrnin~ ~ ~pncns~-~ Cor2m.~2~~v +'~.e~ 44al~wc~, }~ow~v Pr~~al. a-t Kenai ~~ Z w~~- -e-~l~e' f° 6" .~,.ec~~if~ a2' Gt~~- ~~~~ea(J -l~ J2a~zn~ a, ha.t~h~ .Coza~di canywlu,4~ ~eae~ gChb~i1, a,~,r.~~ ,~yid~rr6c~ a~,ea~'. r5 ~Coft~nwa~zf-~G~ ~{,~Gti, ~ 996// /~1 ~yf, ~~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ 4+ ~a ~~`~ezzz~~'~ United Methodist Church of the New Covenant & Gabriel's Cherubs Daycare ~ ~ ,~,_ ~~_ ~ ~ P.O. BOX 428, KENAI, ALASKA 996 1 1 -0428 PHONE ^ (907) 283-7868 •~_ ~.<„ `~ J// To: Kenai City Council ATTN: John Williams Dear Mayor Williams, I am writing this note to protest the application made by Mr, Jim Singree to use the upstairs of the Katmai as a co~n¢nunity residential center. If this were to be permitted in the downtown area, many businesses could be hurt. I have spoken to John and Karen Gensle of Creative Play daycare on this issue. It is my belief that it would not be only their business that would suffer. Even though Gabriel's is further from the Katmai, our parents are concerned about the welfare of their children, too. As of writing this, I am aware that Mr. Singree has decided not to apply for a permit. My concern is for the future. There are several other areas that could be utilized for the use of a community residential center. One option would be Wildwood. However, I'm not sure ~ major residential area could be considered. Maybe if it were placed in a semi- isolated to isolated area, more people would feel secure about the safety of their families. I would hope you would take the feelings of the parents at Cabriel's and at other daycares to heart when making any decisions concerning a residential home. Cordially, . wn M~ Bri on Administrator ~\ N w A .~. ~ ~~ (dir.,-~ of/11aGCvrr~ -; ~w.2.~ !D P6 4 ~ a ~~~ ~ ~n ~. ~°~" ~~r ~ ~,.~~ ~ ~, ~~~~ ~ ~~~ r,`k ~, 2Qa Q~ - - -- -•-- r.ni. .~ ~~~ - - / ~f - ~ : - ~--,, ~ ~ ~ ~~L,c1oc~-~~ ,,~n c~Q ~ ccx~. ~~ L ~. ~~ - t ~ ~ ~~ i , ~) ~ Ck,~.~~ ~:~- -~~ ~cn-~.. rn cam. ut~a~.-f~.~. ~ `~ ' ~~`- ~,~~ ~~ I h,S~1~, vhc~ i ~, ~V ~~ ESL: c~. (~,'Ledc.~ ~'1 c~..Q..~ w ~O lR.~aS~., Qa. ~(19~~, - YI.Q.O~,It, C~1'L~Q,(~., C'JOc/~~ ,f ~ ~C~j d ~ ~ _ A.o ~ X 7 y~~~ ~ ~~ l ~~~ ' ~~.m. ~. o,s irk. nn ~ ~ t r ~ l -~o--~ ~ _ / a / ~ GU ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ r^ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ P `~ ~ ` /- 1-~-~~~ ~G ~ ~ ~. ~ ~, ~~~~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~~.~ ~- ~ a ~ ~ ~ l~ ~~ U~ y _~~~ ~t S~~L~~ ~ ~ ~~ vZ I ~c~-YSo' L1 .r-- ~~°1r~ f ` 1c~ .'~'\r~~~~u~Ja2o~u~~~ C~mm~s5ic ~e`~~ . o~~~ h~ \~ `,"may }~~ i ~~~`c~e.r 1`.f `te a ~~.~Cl r e s O ~~~~ ~e ~~-e. ~1`(~ ~~ W'p~ ~'1W~e ~t~ ~(~-1~.11~Ci1 ~-~°~..s~ c~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ c~oy~ ~~ ~1-~ ~~~~. ~~ ~1~c~, Icy i ~~Y1L. ~i~td,tie~ ~c~ ~~-~~ ~~~~s ~a~~ ~~3 -- .5~~'S~ Anc b.~'~{ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ p 4~ "~.. ~~o ,~ , C~ v/« G~ rc Ce ~ -ti ~ ~~ -- r ~e ~x~.s -f ~, -~ ~ s -~`~ (~ ~ a S~ec~ . ~~ 5 a ,~ _" ~,e ~l ~ ( 5 Glds~ r~ Sao 1 ~~~ ~ v.~ ~~s Crew 5~1~~s C~J a G ~nc~°~nss -~e~ GQ ~~ ~,' s0. 1 ~ g~.~ ~, ~~~ ~ J ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ; ~~~ ~- ~ SAS ~ o c~ A' J v{11 ~ D ~~ 1~~~ ~~wS~ ~ , ~~ ~~ ~n ~~~ S -- --I-10-1(0 (I ~-ttz i ~hco~ v~- t~la.c~ ~hov~ ~ wo.~,~~ t~~1 `vcvv~ ~~x9~~ ~OhI~.C~ ~'° \~' ~C~ Z, `fo.~., (.tAo~2~Y6+, a,nd +nd. ~uabc~„ol `9.n - o ~~se P/q~j cue , ~-Q da b~.Gmu ed, f~ c~u:Pol wo+A.PaI ~a r ~. r0~.,.,~~ N~ a 0. 6~n~ p Pq ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ . ~~ U d' ~~ - - -- - -- ~ ~ ~ r . e i .~ f, t~~ 1~ y ~ - P ~ Y ~ '~ 7 PP ~ ~ -~ G ~ ~' (oc,~ ~ ~es5'~ S ~~ ~U.C c l ~ l ~ ~ ~ c 1 c;~ ~~eil w - /~~ r ~ 4~. , ~~ ~~ 2 . ~ 4 .~ ~, ~~ Cie c,--c._c h ~ ~~ 1~~ .~~ '~ b °~„~, 1C.Q ~u , i ~~ 3oa (~,~~ ~-~ ~- ~~- ~~e~~ 1 - --- ~... ~ ~ r. no ~~ ~ ~1- A /111 / /1 6 /'~ n Q aOn l/I ~r C.~/I'1 !}'1 /.SS'Ia /1 7~ff~. l0~~+ a ~ ~' ItA~~G/~~/ ~~~ ~~ 116 ~°c~'T~ c ~ SC. r~vo~ S' o R ,/arty c.~tR~. C~nT~RS'. /~0 41 n`~~ ~ y , ~ ~~ ~~i~ ~ ~~ ~T~~ ~v~UR ~ ~~~ia0 .~ ~ ~ o~ y ~~~~ ~ ~-~ ~ r~ /~ ~2~-s- ~~~~/ ~~~D ~~ o : P12~n.~n~ a 7.~.~n~ ~r -1-l~l,Q{c~Yts1 arc ~~ ,~ ~ ~flYi~ k~t?~e.~ ~ u.~uld" lika -ia ~ o~~ ~~~rrid~~,~ o~o~d~ --~ ~.~,rx~ ~ ~~ ~ cvam~r~s shau[d ~~ Ise q,-it~k~ nxtr ar"t crf Yer~ii ~QC(S -1c (PS,der~-l~l arks. the Cr+~j tPU.4t~~ ~-~ G''~Idren are. ~rnpo~~rn~r~k tab M~ ~~ ..~a h2 ~'~'f04Pf~ `f0 ~ C'bur~.~I trev~i~,~- do yu~+ ~x~i•l y~~c~ t~t~ r~~~ ~~ A (~ ~ ~.1,,, ,l,Y~,~F Ya.~fb~r C.~+~~1~rtYv{s ~ ~J~Idubod Pt-sQn ~ Pry ~ ~ l~a-1 ~ c~~ m ~nri.! s ~-l' C(1/11U~,~S ~n'~Y11I1(~ ~` V p1l~ YfG~ ~~ ~~ p.a $Q~ ~il~~ -- - ----- ---•--- ~~. ~ cvc i c-r~ Y. 85 J~'~~ . /L/ /9 ~~ l ~ ~~ f 1., / 7 / ~ L? ~~'~~ r~ h~~ `~ ~~a - - --- -- --- ~o~ ~ «.., r. er CJ ,l f r ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~'~ . ~ Win- ©~ ~~ ~-~ ~Z~~~ ~~ r - ~~ a~~- ~~~~ ~~-, I I - --- - - --- ~~.. ~. mot., r. n~ 1 h~ ~~ o~ Ir1o.~? ~ hawo;a.~ 9aoco~.~ c~ oar -~-h e_ ~~~~ .,rY-, -~h~ ~~sY,~., C `~ . ~~ _ ~ ~ `Q QI u~~ ~r ~' ~ ~ air ~ Q m ~~. ~r , s~c~r, h~ \:.% • v , ' ' ~^'~~~~ ~~ 1 ~ 1 ~ (~ 1 l ~-1 ~ ` a~~-~a~~ .. - .... ~ . .... r . p l 1-10-96 v, ~y of Kenai " 210 Fidalgo Ave. Kenai, Alaska Dear Planning & Zoning Commission Members: Please. deny the Jim C, Singree/Katmai Hotel conditional use permit application as it will be a .hazard to the children attending. Creative Play ~ Preschools,. Ltd. The parents have shown a great deal of concern over the .safety of their children and have stated that they. will. not remain at the center if this permit is issued and the conversation into a halfway house takes place. Our center would probably havo to close due to -loss of chi{dren. A halfway .house does note belong next to a child care center.. s ~~ ~~ ~r ~ ~~ Sincerely, ~~~~~ Karin L, Gensel, Program Administrator Creative Play & Preschools, L.td. - --- - - - - ---- - -- -._.... _-. ~~ ~~. ~ ~o~. ~ «.., r. na /-~~ ^~ V r . ~~ hog ~~ ~.~- ~C~i ~~~ ~ ~ . ~fb~ h~~' ~ ~ ,~~r~n~ ~L ~e l ,~ Y,c ~' ~ Y J/ ~a~ Aso ~~~ c~sax,(~ he /Y~c~ch 1~e-~f,~ r: ~-~ s~aw(d n ~+ h.~ ~~n ~ ~a~~ ~ ~ ~ n Gtr-~,~ corn .~~~ one. 'l Y,~ P( ~ ~ ~-r C~, , d n o n~ n.e~~ ~a~ ,~h~l ` rh ~-l u~.n ce. are;ua~o~ ~-~. °~ 1'"1~~.n~ ~ozC ~lrc.~u.m,-, ~S3~.e,1-~e ,- ~,,~ a~c~e~~ ~ ~, N $~ IA~Q, c~ ~ '~~ y v ~~~ ~~~~~ ~ztizoz6~ -• -- -. .-.._._ _ .. ... ~_.~~~ 7b f LbL fL4b P..91 ' aruc~ I Q, ,19 4l0 i(o~ I~la,~,,~,~.n anc~ Zertyc,~, ~: ~, ~' ~ k~-,rnau:, 1~~.~2 ~~ ``~ Wes- ~. C.~.e~.~.,~,~ ~ ~. . ~^ W ~J ~ J 10.11 f~.tL Cl~l,~~ c~u'L~ C'.a'L~~@.dJLe,rt~ ~' ~ n ~ i ~ ~, 1 l°,,c.~-.ate -~ h ~~- i-n d.i.c~ i c~l,C,c:ctQ,d ~ J ~~ ~-'i N ~3 ~~ s a1 ~ ~ tCiri,~.} ~ ~ v ~`'jzo2 ~~~~~w t~C ~,n. cu; , Cafe.,, 9 ~ ~ r l st 8i eL9 - ~.-/v-- ~' G~ ~~---~-~- -moo c~~ ~ ~~o, ~`t- ~,~,~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ 3 ~ ~' s ~~d n 3 ~~ ~~ ... JAN J9g~ ~, - - - - ---- - - __.... ~n r cow raga P. 01 ~~n~~ l 0~ t4 q ~~ f l-~-~-~I,QYYS ~.c%~ ~, a ~~ °`~ • V ~/~.t 7"~ Y 1~.c ~~ ~a~ 1g17 qa6~~ « b7 d 9 SOT>>~ ~ JAN 1996 ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~''~~ ~ ~~ az~~~~~ ~a, Memorandum Date: 01 /05/96 To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Jack La Shot, City Engineer ~~/' RE: Warehouse Subdivision When the preliminary plat for Warehouse Subdivision was approved, two cotingencies were noted, those being submittal of an asbuilt survey and a landscape site plan. Administration doesn't see any encroachment problems on neighboring properties from the asbuilt survey. The developer has said that the attached landscape site plan represents the concept approved from the Planning & Zoning Commission. Also, attached are minutes and information from the November 8th meeting when the plat was approved. DOES THE COMMISSION AGREE THAT THIS SATISFIES THE COMMISSIONS' REQUIREMENTS? JL/mk Attachments n C~oe9~ . ~., I~ I [>= o ~ it C~oe9~ L~o~ ~~g L2 T- -~~~ N89°59'22"W 131.99' J ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ Note: Lot Served By ~ ~ f, C ~ ~~ ~ City Water & Sewer ~O s~. - ~ 9 ~ ~ ~i . -4 1 gravel rn ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ o ~^ . ~ 1 pad N °~ n^ o n\ I W N ~I ~~ Di ~C~ N U ~ I s ,. LOt ~ ~~~~ C~oe9~ ~ wl 6~- [~o~ uC~ ~' ~ ~~~~ 65.2' ~ ?I // -~' O /o N two-story N N ~ Z ~ /~°` ~ office/shop ~ O ~~ ,~ complex Z \ /~ ~\ + 144.3• 65.2' 52.1' _ 139.8' ~ _ - ---- 'p~ 64.5' n1 gravel parking 33 M~--------------"' - 10' Utility Easement N TH S89°58'41"W 156.99' ~_ ~e~ ~ _ M First Avenue 2`9'h~ ~2.e~ ~ ~iob ~ (~~~ ~~1 ~~ \ AS-BUILT CERTIFICATION LEGEND As-Built Certificate • Rebar/Pipe (found) ~C$f Water Shut Off I hereby certify that the improvements hereon exist as shown on the following described property. D Vent Pipe ~ Fire Hydrant LOt ~ Scale: 1" = 50' F.B. #: 95-9, pgs. 45-46 U~/arehouse Subd. KENAI RECORDING DISTRICT and that no encroachments exist except as indicated. Plat: 95-90 Date: 4 January, 1996 ~i Drawn: REW W.O. # 96003 Disk:\D13\Warehouse Exclusion Note: ~~~~~~~~~ ~~T ~~~~ It is the responsibility of the Owner to determine the 11-1~~ existence of any easements, covenants, or restrictions I 605 SWIRES DRIVE which do not appear on the recorded subdivision plat. ~ KENAI, ALASKA 99611 Under no circumstances should any data hereon be used for construction or for establishing boundary or SURVEYORS 283-9047 PLANNERS fence lines. No. Bearin Distance Ll SO°11'53"E 42.00' L2 N89°59'22"W 25.00' ~ ~ .- a - V IJQf--jnJ~-- x.~{{477 ~cv ~l(l~U, A~ ~ l `7V ~_ l~~ °~ u V1 '~ ~_ `~~~ ~sl ,LO'L~SI STAFF REPORT To: Planning & Zoning Commission Date: October 6, 1995 Prepared By: JL~mk Res: PZ95-51 GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Clint Hall P.O. Box 2829 Kenai, AK 99611 Requested Action: Landscaping/Site Plan Review Legal Description: Gov't Lot 167, T6N, R11 W, S.M. Existing Zoning: General Commercial Current Land Use: Commercial ANALYSIS City Engineer: No comment. Building Official Applicant intends to build a 3200 square foot office and warehouse for business and consumer services. This is a principal permitted use is Zone CG according to the land use table of KMC page 14-65. The office is for business and the warehouse is an accessory use by definition of KMC 14.20.320. The site plan submitted complies with KMC 14.25.045. RECOMMENDATIONS Recommend approval of the site plan. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution No. PZ95-51 2. Application 3. Drawings C:\WPDDCS\PZ95\RES9551.COM clT~r of KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FtESOLUTI'ON NO. PZ95-51 ]LANDSCAPINGISITE PLAN' REVIEW A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI RECOMMENDING THAT THE ATTACHED LANDSCAPING/SITE PLAN REVIEW BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: WHEREAS, the attached Landscaping/Site Plan Review was submitted for Clint Hall , and received October 6, 1995. WHEREAS, the City of Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission finds this plan provides for orderly and safe development within the City commensurate with protecting the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens, and provides adequate and convenient open spaces, light and air in order to avoid congestion of commercial and industrial areas; and, WHEREAS, the plan appears to provide for landscaping and/or the retention of natural vegetation in conjunction with commercial and industrial development within the City; and, WHEREAS, the purpose of landscaping is to visually enhance the City's appearance and reduce erosion and storm runoff, and the plan appears to meet this criteria. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI THAT THE LANDSCAPING/SITE PLAN BE APPROVED AS SUBMITTED. PASSED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, October 11 , 1995. E T: Planning Secretary CHAIRM N C:\WPDDCS\PZ95\RES95.51 LANDSCAPINGJSITE PLAN REVIEW ,. APPLICATION APPLICANT ~ ~-- -~,~ C C ADDRESS.. ~~~, ~ ,2 ~Z 9 MAILING ADDRESS P~ ~ ~ x 2 Z q l'Il.~-a / PHONE 2 ~~ 00 ZONING C RR RR-1 RS RS-1 RS-2 RU CC CG IL R TSH DESIGNATION (Circle one) LEGAL .PROPERTY ~ I - ~, ~~ LC OWNER iC iH Please include the following in the Site Plan. If not applicable please put an NA next to the item. a. Common and scientific name of the planting materials to be used in the project. i ~(/~ b. Typical planting details. ~~ c. Location of all planting areas and relationship to buildings, parking areas, and driveways. /V/'~ d. Identification and location of non-living landscaping materials to be used. e. Identification of on-site snow storage areas. f. Drainage patterns. r/ g. Description of buildings, including building height, ground floor dimensions, kinds of building materials, type of architecture anticipated. h. Physical features of the property including location of atl buildings, ingress and egress, and unusual features of the property which may restrict development and drainage. Additional comments: /, e ~~i,--T-iJ'__1'LN~1J~ ~ r~ y~ ?~, ~ e C /j.r,T.~ ~' io/,~. ~.~i C L~ ~Gf,~ C:\NPDOCS\fORMS\LANDSCAP.APP .S'/~/+v ~ ~ a .v~rC /} ~rG L t G ~~' f a Woa "ant/ isl ,00'LEl m _~ Z O s O J O eV __ _ __ bUVd +Weu^9/ ~Nkd ~ f O ::~ G t mdm Q i ,0,91 "C~~> Y 0 'S-1~z , , "~ ___________ Q i t..,...w.... . , , i , i , „o-,oo + g¢ ,t IC .o-.a a,c ~~, _____________ ~~ ~ c W ,o-,n II ~ ~~ ~ ~ § ~ x~ II f qm m ~ m 'I ~ L II 7 tl Q m > .~ O u o II ~ o o ~ ~ a a E ~ t II ~ '£ o ~ ~ O ~= m ~ ,n U3O ~8, ~I m m~ #m x~:° ,~ II O ~ ~ _- ~~ ~~ ~~ i ~ , ' , s = .O.n A.a _____~_______~_ , z,00'LZ •o-.~ ,o-,t ,o-,r ill i O-, Q n t O - 4 s n -a 'sg Z 6l 3 > > c 3 ~ 4 > ~ a a w ,Odl£i W Q a~ i ~ frame that there should be a permit on record. Bryson also questioned if the intention had been for the building to be a single story structure. Third, if this was intended to be a single story and there is a likelihood that the area could be rezoned to suburban residential, it could possibly be a conforming situation in the future. But it is not at this point. VOTE: Glick No Werner-Quade No Mahurin No Goecke No Bryson No MOTION FAILED UNANIMOUSLY. 7. NEW BUSINESS a. Lease of Tidelands--Memo from Kim Howard Acting Chairman Bryson asked if staff would be present for this item. Kebschull responded that Jack La Shot was attending a meeting in Soldotna and was planning on being at the P&Z Meeting as near to 7 p.m. as possible. Bryson noted that with the approval of the Commission he would like to move to Item 7b and return to 7a when Mr. La Shot was present. b. Landscape Site Plan Review, Resolution 95-51, Clint Hall Acting Chairman Bryson noted that Mr. Hall has been a client of his firm in the past; although, there are no current projects that he is aware of at this time. Bryson stated it was his intent to vote on this item unless there was an objection. Bryson stated that Mr. Hall is building in a commercially zoned district. Bryson asked Mr. Hall to describe to the Commission his plans. Mr. Hall informed the Commission that he is building an office with an attached warehouse. Mr. Hall noted that the plan as submitted with the packet did not leave enough room for trucks to tum around with the planned snow removal area. He noted that it appeared that it may be necessary to eventually move the trees back and have the snow pushed towards the back of the lot. Hall stated that the original plan was premature. Hall added there was a small section of natural terrain he had planned to leave in the front corner of the property, but he now feels it would be more attractive to remove it and plant grass. Discussion regarding planned snow removal area and options. Carl Glick asked if the roof overhang was open. Hall confirmed this. Hall continued stating he had initially planned to leave natural areas but now felt grass would look better. Phil Bryson stated he was aware of a sewer line that runs from one house on First Street to a house that runs on Spruce Street and asked if that runs across Hall's property. Hall stated no. Bryson stated he had a personal preference, even for snow storage areas, that the areas planted in grass. Carl Glick asked if Mr. Hall had intention to plant shrubs along the front of the building. Mr. Hall stated there is a walkway along the Planning & Zoning Committee October 12, 1995 Minutes Page 4 ~ front of the building; however, he had not addressed the issue of shrubs. Hall continued stating that between the walkway and the building there is a small strip that something could be planted in. The area was left open for some type of landscaping; it has not been decided at this point what to put there. Bryson noted that if the drawing was to scale that possibly the cars could be moved back and this would allow room for a strip for shrubbery. Hall stated that was a possibility. Hall commented that all of the homes he built last year included landscaping as a courtesy and the grass -seeds used worked well. Karen Mahurin asked if he was planning on leaving trees as noted. Hall noted that may not be feasible with the room needed for tracks and the trees may be removed. Mahurin asked if this would pretty much be a bare lot. Hall confirmed that the back side would be bare. Hall asked the Commission if they were looking for more in a Landscape Plan. Mahurin noted that on a lot near Hall's lot that there were some people who had been before the Commission on other matters. Mahurin stated the Commission is very dedicated to that area but understands the commercial value. Mahurin stated her main concern is that some grass and shrubbery be maintained and the area remain nice. Bryson commented that the people on the next lot had worked hard to make the area nice. Mahurin added these were long-time residents of the area. Hall ended by saying they wanted their office to look nice. Goecke stated that he felt that as long as Hall was willing to put shrubbery in front of the office, in the two front corners and plant some grass, that would look nicer that weeds. RON GOECKE RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION PZ95-51 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR CLINT HALL WITH SHRUBBERY AND GRASS AS NOTED IN DISCUSSION. MOTION SECONDED BY CARL GLICK. Vote: Werner-Quade Yes Mahurin Yes Goecke Yes Glick Yes Bryson Yes MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. Acting Chairman Bryson stated he would like to return to Item 7a, Lease of Tidelands, with City Engineer Jack La Shot's arrival. Mr. La Shot apologized for being late advising the Commission he was at another meeting. a. Lease of Tidelands-Memo from Kim Howard Mr. La Shot noted that the Harbor Commission did approve of the lease. Bryson asked if council had discussed this item. Councilman Smalley stated yes and the council instructed the city administration to go ahead with the lease as proposed. Mahurin asked if that was before the Planning and Zoning Commission took action. Planning & Zoning Committee October 12, 1995 Minutes Pape 5 CITY OF: KEiVAI 'PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. PZ 95 58 SUBDIVISION PLAT A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI RECOMMENDING THAT THE ATTACHED SUBDIVISION PLAT BE APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: WHEREAS, the attached plat Warehouse Subdivision was referred to the City of Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission on October 27, 1995 and received from Integrity Surveys ,and WHEREAS, the City of Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission finds: 1) Plat area is zoned General CommerciaVSuburban Residential and therefore subject to said zone conditions. 2) Water and sewer: Available 3) Plat (deer) (does not) subdivide property within a public improvement district subject to special assessments. There (+s) (is not) a delinquency amount owed to the City of Kenai for the referenced property. 4) Installation agreement or construction of improvements (+s) (is not) required. 5) Status of surrounding land is shown. 6) Utility easements, if required, are (not shown. 7) Any existing structures must be shown on plat. 8) Street names designated on the plat are correct. 9) Contingent upon submittal of an asbuilt survey and landscape/site plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI THAT THE KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVE WAREHOUSE SUBDIVISION SUBJECT TO ANY NEGATIVE FINDINGS AS STATED ABOVE OR ON ATTACHED STAFF COMMENT SHEET. PASSED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, NOVEMBER 8, 1995. -G~~~~~_ CHAIRPERSON ST: Planning Secretary Mr. Bryson stated he would like to remind the Commission that they do not ~ approve plats. The Commission makes recommendations to the borough. Mr. Walker stated he felt the Commission was cognizant of the fact that they are recommending approval or not recommending approval. Mr. Walker asked if any further discussion. Seeing none, called for question. VOTE ON PZ95-56, SUBDIVISION PLAT APPROVAL, BAILEY ESTATES: BRYSON YES WERNER-QUADE YES GOECKE NO MAHURIN YES GLICK YES WALKER NO MOTION PASSED. b. Subdivision Plat Approval, Warehouse Subdivision, PZ95-58 CARL GLICK MOVED FOR APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION PZ95-58, SUBDIVISION PLAT APPROVAL, WAREHOUSE SUBDIVISION. RON GOECKE SECONDED THE MOTION. Chairman Walker asked for additional staff comments. Mr. La Shot stated nothing additional; however, would call the Commissions' attention to the recommendation that a new site plan and asbuilt be requested. La Shot stated property swapping has been done and he did not feel the landscape/site plan, as submitted, had been followed. Walker asked if the maker of the motion would like to include those comments. Mr. Glick and Mr. Goecke concurred. Chairman Walker noted as no persons in the audience this evening, the item would be brought to the Commission for discussion. Ms. Mahurin noted she had a hard time trying to understand what was being asked in the plat request and if she could have a few minutes with Mr. Bryson or anyone else to explain it to her. Chairman Walker stated perhaps staff could explain it. Jack La Shot advised the best way to describe it is looking at the dotted lines shows the lot as it used to be, Government Lot 67. La Shot explained, some of the land to the north, 42 feet, has been sold to the neighbor. A distance, 25 feet, to the east had been acquired. The owner is the same on both of those lots. La Shot stated he thought the owners did a property swap. La Shot noted Minutes November 8, 1995 Page 6 his concerns were that on Lot 3 there is an old house that looks close to where they have cleared and there may be an encroachment created. There is a house on Lot 1 also. And, the new structure on Lot 2. Mahurin asked if Lot 2 is where Hall is building his new building. La Shot confirmed this. Mahurin stated the lot has been totally cleared of every tree in existence. Mr. La Shot stated that he thought the clearing comes out to the full extent of the new Lot 2 rather than the old Lot 67. Mahurin asked Mr. La Shot to restate this. Mr. La Shot stated that just from looking at the information available, not relying on any survey information, it looks like what is cleared probably include the swapped property. This clearing would be the full extent of Lot 2 past what was Lot 67 and what the previous site plan was submitted for. La Shot noted that is why he is asking for a new site plan and an asbuilt. Continuing, he stated there are three building involved and a previously approved Landscape/Site Plan. Walker asked if there was further discussion. Mr. Goecke asked Mr. La Shot, that if where this plat approval is means that the site plan review that was done is history. La Shot stated that is how he views it. La Shot stated the original site plan was submitted for Lot 67 which, if this plat plan is passed, no longer exists. La Shot stated he felt what has been done coincides more with the new plat rather than Lot 67. Goecke stated what is needed is a new site plan submittal. La Shot agreed and added a new site plan, landscaping review and submission of an asbuilt be required before we allow them to finalize this plat. La Shot stated he did not think this request was unreasonable. Mahurin stated she concurred with this request. Chairman Walker asked for further discussion. Ms. Kebschull advised the Commission that Mr. Hall called city hall today. He wanted to note that if this did come up for discussion tonight he wanted the Commission to know that he felt that he was doing what he had stated he was going to do in the original landscaping plan. And, that he was planning on planting grass and shrubs. Ms. Mahurin asked if Mr. Hall had called and offered the above information only if it came up for discussion. Ms. Kebschull confirmed this. Ms. Mahurin asked if the amendment covers the-Chairman Walker interrupted to note there is not an amendment before the Commission. Ms. Mahurin restated to ask to hear the motion. Kebschull read the motion, "Moved to approve PZ95-58." Chairman Walker noted an addition was made with agreement of the maker of the motion and the second to add the staff recommendations. Ms. Mahurin stated she would like to amend the motion. Mahurin stated she would like to have resubmitted a site plan and a landscaping plan. Bryson seconded the amendment. Chairman Walker asked if Ms. Mahurin was aware that this was part of the main motion? Mahurin stated probably not. She did Minutes November 8, 1995 Page 7 not understand that the Commission was asking that the site plan be ~ resubmitted. Mahurin clarified that this was stated in the City Engineer's report. Walker confirmed this. Mahurin stated, with the permission of her second, she would take back the site plan but would like to ask for a detailed landscaping plan. Bryson concurred. Chairman Walker for any discussion on the amendment. Ms. Mahurin stated she was getting frustrated. Mahurin stated she felt credibility was important when dealing with the same developer over and over. Mahurin stated she is, as a member of this Commission, beginning to have a problem and she would like to have the asbuilt and landscape/site plan resubmitted so that she can verify the plans. Mahurin stated she would like the record to reflect that she will be very carefully looking at the submittals. Teresa Werner-Quade stated that some of the landscaping plans that have come before the Commission leave a lot to be desired. Werner-Quade stated she felt that as a Commission the plans have been routinely approved and she agrees better scrutiny should be given to the landscaping site plan reviews that come before the Commission. VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT TO PZ95-58: WERNER-QUADE YES GOECKE YES MAHURIN YES GLICK YES BRYSON YES WALKER YES MOTION PASSED. Bryson stated he had one question for the administration. Bryson asked if the requirement for the site plan is for a building permit approval and asked how this was appropriate to what he is proposing to do, other than updating what he said he was going to do. There were oral modifications at our last meeting. La Shot stated that it is true that the site plan review is required before the building permit is issued. La Shot stated he thought the site plan had probably changed but the city could not take away the building permit but could require a review of the landscape plan. La Shot stated he was not sure he had answered Mr. Bryson's question. Bryson asked if what the Commission would be looking for is an updated site plan; La Shot stated yes, one that is approved by the Commission. Mr. Goecke asked La Shot if a site plan review is supposed to be done prior to issuing a building permit. La Shot stated yes for permits over $10,000 in an ~ industrial zone. Mr. Goecke asked to be corrected if he was wrong but he felt that building was under construction before any permits had been approved by Minutes November 8, 1995 Page 8 the Commission. La Shot advised that Hall had started construction and that sometimes builders get away with this by applying for a footing permit so that they can get started and that this happens quite often. La Shot stated he was not sure how to correct this problem. A lot of times builders are pushed by weather and the builder will come in and get a permit for the least amount so they can get started before winter and before they come to Planning and Zoning. Mr. Bryson stated that concerning the plat approval he believed the city has a requirement that any existing structures need to be shown on the plat. Bryson stated the plat is new as far as the Commission is concerned and that there is probably a statutory requirement there that needs to be met. Ms. Mahurin requested that when this request comes back that the administration supply to the Commission the previous action that was taken so it could be referred to. Chairman Walker stated he agreed that that would be a benefit to all Commissioners. Chairman Walker asked if there was any further discussion. Walker stated the amendment was approved. Before the Commission is the main motion as amended. Walker called for the question: VOTE ON PZ95-58: GOECKE YES MAHURIN YES GLICK YES BRYSON YES WERNER-QUADE YES WALKER YES MOTION APPROVED. OLD BUSINESS: a. Comp Plan Update Chairman Walker stated the Commission had before them a handout of some of the updates that have been approved. And, a listing on public facilities of items that we have completed. A couple items are still missing and one that needs changes. Chairman Walker asked if Teresa Werner-Quade wished to speak to this item. Ms. Werner-Quade stated she had met with Jack and Marilyn last week to bring the Commission the information they had been given. Werner-Quade stated it appeared that Marilyn had worked hard to bring this to the Commission. Ms. Minutes November 8, 1995 Page 9 EY ~b SENIOR CITIZENS -~--~------ The City of Kenai provides a wide variety of services to the elderly of the Central Peninsula through their Kenai senior services department. These services are available five days per week year round from 7:30 A.M. to 5:00 p.m. through the efforts of a well qualified and caring staff. The surrounding elderly population is 1,772. Located within the defined service area of the Kenai center are 809 individuals. Our defined service district encompasses Kenai, Salamatof, Kasilof, Clam Gulch, Cohoe and a portion of Kalifonsky Beach Road. Services are also available to senior citizens living in Nikiski, Soldotna, Ridgeway and Sterling and other areas of the peninsula. The Mayor's Council on Aging has recognized the need to direct their services to those with the greatest social and economic need. The direction of services are awned at those persons aged 7S and older. Because, this group represents the most frail and vulnerable of the aged population, special attention is given to encourage their participation and involvement with the center activities and programs. The senior center is located in the heart of downtown Kenai on a prime Kenai River bluff lot, clearly visible from the Kenai Spur Highway. Kenai Senior Services provides the following services which will help ensure the continued independence of the elderly through: • Congregate Meals • Transportation • Home Delivered Meals • Escort Services • Nutrition Education • Outreach • Referrals/Infonnation • Shopping Assistance • Telephone Reassurance • Physical Fitness • Personal Advocacy • Client Finding • Letter Writing • Passenger Assistance • Health Screening • Recreation • Volunteer Opportunities • Housing Assistance • Assessment • Form Completion • Vintage Pointe Manor Apartments Support for the senior citizens program is provided through grants and private donations. `Those agencies providing funding are: • Division of Senior Services • City of Kenai • Kenai Peninsula United Way • Kenai Peninsula Borough • Private Donation • Fund Raising Activities During the past 10 years, Kenai Senior Services has grown from a budget of $52,459, serving 373 unduplicated elderly, to a multi- purpose senior center with a yearly budget over $350,000 which provides services to over 1,300 annually. GOALS AND, OBJECTIVES To continue to provide quality services to the older Alaskans that ensure honor, dignity, security, independence, and assist them in maintaining quality lives, the senior program should implement the following objectives. • Obtain funding for construction of a 20 unit addition to Vintage Pointe Manor, a city owned elderly housing project. • Adapt to the changing, more active life styles of today's (and tomorrow's) older adults. Such adaptation might involve extending evening anc# weekend center hours and programming; greater sensitivity to cultural preferences for mid-to-late afternoon main meals rather than strict adherence to noontime offerings; and elective approach to program and activities planning, allowing more choices for those who prefer a more elective participation rather than spending all day at the center. • Center staffmembers must come to a greater recog?rution of the role of new technology and the part it can play in the more effective management and delivery of service to older adults in the center and community. • The center staff and Council on Aging members need to be more aggressive in exploring the long range benefits of planned giving as a component of community education and funding strategies. Educate themselves about existing foundations, especially those which have identified senior centers as funding categories. /~~ AGENDA RENAI CITY COIINCIL - REGIILAR MEETING JANIIARY 3, 1996 7:00 P.M. RENAI CITY COIINCIL CHAMBERS A. CALL TO ORDER 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call 3. Agenda Approval 4. Consent Agenda *All items listed with an asterisk (*) are considered to be routine and non-controversial by the Council and will be approved by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council Member so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the agenda as part of the General Orders. B. BCHEDIILED PIIBLIC COMMENT (10 Minutes) C. PIIBLIC HEARINGS _/ /~ 1. Ordinance No. 1670-95 - Amending KMC Section 23.35.020 ~GG`~il to Subject Employees to Disciplinary Action for Failure to Comply with the City's Drug and Alcohol Abuse and Testing Policy or Failure to Comply with City, State or Federal Safety and Health Law, Regulations and Policy. 2. Resolution No. 95-80 - Supporting the Completion of the Kenai Spur Unity Trail Pedestrian/Bike Path and the Kenai Spur Highway Expansion Project, in the Phases as Originally Scheduled, as a Number-One Priority on the National Highway System. a. Remove from table. Q ---~ b. Replace with Substitute Resolution No. 95-80 - /~-~~ ~' Supporting the Kenai Spur Road: Mile Post (MP) 0- 2.8 Project, as a Number-One Priority on the National Highway System Program. c. Consideration of substitute resolution. 3. Resolution No. 96-1 - Supporting the Kenai Spur Unity ~~~ Trail Pedestrian/Bike Path Project as a Number-One Priority on the Trails & Recreational Access for Alaska (TRAAK) Program. -1- 3. *Ordinance No. 1671-96 - Finding that a Portion of Tract C, Daubenspeck Property Subdivision (as shown on Attachment A) Is Not Required for Public Purpose. ~`~~ 4. Discussion - Setting Public Hearing Date/Thompson Park 07~~ 9~ Sewer and Water Special Assessment District. 5. Discussion - State Transportation Needs and Priorities in Alaska. ~~~ 6. Discussion - City Manager's Report: Assessment ~,~~~y~/~- District for Kenai River Bank Restoration Proposed by N®~ the Beaver Creek Bank Restoration and Protection Group G~ Petition. ERECIITIVE SESSION I. ADMINISTRATION REPORTS 1. Mayor 2. City Manager 3. Attorney 4, City Clerk 5. Finance Director 6. Public Works Director 7. Airport Manager J. DISCIISSION 1. Citizens (five minutes) 2. Council R. ADJOIIRNMENT -3- 0 /.~ KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH .1 PLANNING COMMISSION BOROUGH ADMINISTRATION BUILDING CONFERENCE ROOM B , SOLDOT'NA, ALASKA JANUARY 8, 1996 7:30 P.M. Tentative Agenda John xarnnaelaatan A. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Areawidc Tetra Expires 1996 B. ROLL CALL Philip Bryson vice chairman C. APPROVAL OF REGULAR AGENDA AND ADOPTION OF I~enaa Caty Teasar Expires 1998 CONSENT AGENDA Ann Whitmore-Painter Partiamentarian All items on the consent agenda are considered routine and noncontroversial by the Planning Moose Pass Area Commission and will be a roved b one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these PP Y Term Expires 1997 items unless a Planning Commissioner or someone from the public so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Peggy G. Boscacci regular agenda. PC Member 5eldovia City Terra Expires 1997 If you wish to comment on a consent agenda item or a regular agenda item other than a public hearing, please advise the recording secretary before the meeting begins, and she will inform the Wayne Carpenter Chairman of your wish to comment. PC Member reward City Term Expires 1996 1. Time Extension Requests 18obert Clutts PC Member a. Ruby's Dazzling Scenic View Subd. Aneh®r P®~t KPB File 94-012 Term Expires 1998 Wei Coleman Location: Off Beaver Loop Road PC Member 3oldotna City Tema Expires 1996 b. Snyder Subdivision (name to change) Leroy oannaway KPB F iie 94-184 PC Member homer City Terns Expires 199s Location: Murwood Avenue and Cottonwood Street; west Ellis Heasley, Jr. of K-Beach Road PC Member Idakaska T E i 1996 2. Plats Granted Administrative A royal p1~ eem xp res Brent Johnson 3 Plats Granted Final A roval Under 20 04 070 PC Member . pp . . ICasilof Area , Team Expires 1997 4. Coastal Management Program Tom Knock Pr, Member C®oper Landang a. Coastal Mana ement Pro ram Consistenc Reviews g g y Term Expires 1998 G. VACATIONS NOT REQUIRING A PUBLIC HEARING -None H. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS 1. P/W Waddell, Donald E. dba Pendell Timber Company KPBPC Resolution 96-01: Granting a platting waiver for certain lands within Section 8, TSS, R11 W, Seward Meridian, Alaska KPB File 96-010 2. P/W Warren, Dean KPBPC Resolution 96-02: Granting a platting waiver for certain lands within Section 15, TSS, R15W, Seward Meridian, Alaska KPB File 96-011 3. Extension of time to reset C 1 /4 to Spring 1996 Sullivan-Guth; Integrity Surveys KPB File 95-161 4. Nubbleof Subdivision, Lot 1; KPBPC Resolution 96-03 : Request for vacations of trails and utility easement granted at Planning Commission meeting of December 11, 1995 to be finalized by Planning Commission resolution per 20.28.120; KPB File 95-167 I. CONSIDERATION OF PLATS 1. Heavenly Sights Subdivision North of Ninilchik; Preliminary Johnson Land Surveying KPB File 96-001 2. Brewer Subdivision No. 2; Reflection Lake Preliminary; Johnson Land Surveying KPB File 96-002 3. Bauwens subdivision #2; Deep Creek Road Preliminary; TWA Surveying KPB File 96-003 4. Sonnichson Sub. Tr. lA; Stariski Point Preliminary; TWA Surveying KPB File 95-059 5. Original Townsite of Seward, Scoby Replat City of Seward; Preliminary Johnson Land Surveying KPB File 96-004 3 6. McGahan Industrial Airpark Subd. No. 2 Nikishka; Preliminary McLane Consulting Group KPB File 96-005 7. Consiel Estates; Caribou Hills Preliminary; Swan Surveying KPB File 96-006 8. Beaver Loop Acres Addition No. 1 City of Kenai; Preliminary Swan Surveying KPB File 96-007 9. Igloo Village; off Kenai Spur Preliminary; Whitford Surveying KPB File 96-008 10. Coal Creek Country Estates Trujillo Addition Kasilof; Preliminary Whitford Surveying KPB File 96-009 11. Westview Hills; northeast of Soldotna Revised Preliminary; Integrity Surveys KPB File 95-190 J. COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS -None K. OTHER/NEW BUSINESS 1. Ordinance 96-02: An Ordinance Establishing an Advisory Planning Commission for the Community of Funny River 2. A Resolution in ,Support of the Draft National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Permit Proposed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency L. ASSEMBLY COMMENTS M. DIRECTOR'S COMMENTS N. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS O. ADJOURNMENT 4 The next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting is January 22, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. in Conference Room B at the Borough Administration Building in Soldotna. PLEASE NOTE: A work session with the Assembly's Land Use Committee, Kenai River Working Group, and the Kenai River Special Management Area Board is scheduled for 5:00 p.m. in Conference Rooms A & B. The topic will be a proposed Kenai River ordinance and its associated timeline. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL ITEMS NO ACTION REQUIRED 1. Soldotna Planning and Zoning Commission December 6, 1995 Minutes 2. Homer Advisory Planning Commission December 6, 1995 Minutes 3. Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission December 13, 1995 Minutes 4. Touchstone, Vol. 5 No. 6, December 1995 s /~ KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH PLANNING COMMISSION ~12i4 ~ ~ ~ BOROUGH ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ~'~ ! CONFERENCE ROOM B ~ SOLDOTNA, ALASKA ~ JANUARY 8, 1996 7:30 P.M. ,a Tentative Agenda John Hammehnan A. CALL TO ORDER chairman Areawide Tenn Expires 1996 B. ROLL CALL Phifip Bryson vice Chairman C. APPROVAL OF REGULAR AGENDA AND ADOPTION OF Kenai City Term Expires 1998 CONSENT AGENDA Ann Whitmore-Painter Parluuncntarmn All items on the consent agenda are considered routine and noncontroversial by the Planning Moose Pass Area Commission and will be roved b one motion. There will be no se arate discussion of these aPP Y p Term Expires 1997 items unless a Planning Commissioner or someone from the public so requests, in which case the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Peggy G. Boscacci regular agenda. PC Member Seldovia City Term Expires 1997 If ou wish to comment on a consent ends item or a re ular enda item other than a public Y a$ g ag hearing, please advise the recording secretary before the meeting begins, and she will inform the Wayne Carpenter Chairman of your wish to wmment. PC Member Seward City Term Expires 1996 1. Time Extension Requests Robert Clutts PC Member a. Ruby's Dazzling Scenic View Subd. '~°eh°` Pont KPB File 94-012 Term Expires 1998 wes Coleman Location: Off Beaver Loop Road PC Member Soldotna City Term Expires 1996 b. Snyder Subdivision (name to change) Leroy Gannaway KPB File 94-184 FC Member Homer City Term Expires 1998 Location: Murwood Avenue and Cottonwood Street; west of K-Beach Road Ellis Hensley, Jr. PC Member Nikiski i 1996 2. Plats Granted Administrative A royal 1~1~ res Term Exp Brent Johnson PC Member 3. Plats Granted Final Approval Under 20.04.070 . Kasilof Area Term Expires 1997 4. Coastal Management Program Tom Knock PC Member Cooper Landing a. Coastal Mana ement Pro ram Consistenc Reviews g S y Term Expires 1998 Don Gilman, Mayor 1) Tyonek; Dock Construction; Tyonek Native _ Lisa Parker ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ,,~ . Corporation; AK 9511-32AA (Cook Inlet 354) Planning r ~'~^ t, >~ Maria , "~ppy f~ , b. Conclusive Consistency Determinations Received from Aam'Assistant ~~r4~ ',t,` .~^ DGC ~ ", ~'~~ .r ~ c. Administrative Determinations ~~,' ~ ~ti- ,~~,~;. ~'-t~.• .... ~ 5. Commissioner Excused Absences .I H a. No excused absences requested. 6. Minutes a. December 11, 1995 D. PUBLIC COMMENT AND PRESENTATIONS (Items other than those appearing on the agenda. Limited to three minutes per speaker unless previous arrangements are made.) E. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Proposed Land Classifications a. A proposal to classify certain Borough lands in the Homer azea as residential; described as E 1 /2 NW 1 /4, Section 31, TSS, R12W, S.M.; Tax Parcel No. 172-031-08; 80f acres (Postponed from 9/25/95) 2. Ordinance 95-38: An Ordinance Establishing an Advisory Planning Commission in the Area Along the North Shore of Kachemak Bay Excluding the Cities of Homer and Kachemak F. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Petition to vacate the 33 foot section line easements (66 feet total) within Lots 3 and 4 Block 1, Rappe-Gallant Subdivision Unit No. 1 (Plat K1578), within Sections 33 and 34, T8N, Rl 1 W, Seward Meridian, Alaska, in the Kenai Recording District; KPB File 95- 182 2. Petition to vacate a portion of Whisper Way between Lot 11 Block Two and Lot 1 Block Three dedicated by Poppy Woods Subdivision (Plat 83-215 KRD) within Section 34, TSN, R11 W, Seward Meridian, Alaska, in the Kenai Recording District. KPB File 95-201 2 G. VACATIONS NOT REQUIRING A PUBLIC HEARING -None - H. SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS 1. P/W Waddell, Donald E. dba Pendell Timber Company KPBPC Resolution 96-01: Granting a platting waiver for certain lands within Section 8, TSS, Rl l W, Seward Meridian, Alaska KPB File 96-010 2. P/W Warren, Dean KPBPC Resolution 96-02: Granting a platting waiver for certain lands within Section 15, TSS, R15W, Seward Meridian, Alaska KPB File 96-011 3. Extension of time to reset C 1 /4 to Spring 1996 Sullivan-Guth; Integrity Surveys KPB File 95-161 4. Nubbleof Subdivision, Lot 1; KPBPC Resolution 96-03: Request for vacations of trails and utility easement granted at Planning Commission meeting of December 11, 1995 to be finalized by Planning Commission resolution per 20.28.120; KPB File 95-167 I. CONSIDERATION OF PLATS 1. Heavenly Sights Subdivision North of Ninilchik; Preliminary Johnson Land Surveying KPB File 96-001 2. Brewer Subdivision No. 2; Reflection Lake Preliminary; Johnson Land Surveying KPB File 96-002 3. Bouwens Subdivision #2; Deep Creek Road Preliminary; TWA Surveying KPB File 96-003 4. Sonnichson Sub. Tr. 1 A; Stariski Point Preliminary; TWA Surveying KPB File 95-059 5. Original Townsite of Sewazd, Scoby Replat City of Sewazd; Preliminary Johnson Land Surveying KPB File 96-004 3 6. McGahan Industrial Airpazk Subd. No. 2 _ Nikishka; Preliminary McLane Consulting Group KPB File 96-005 7. Consiel Estates; Caribou Hills Preliminary; Swan Surveying KPB File 96-006 8. Beaver Loop Acres Addition No. 1 -City of Kenai; Preliminary Swan Surveying KPB File 96-007 9. Igloo Village; off Kenai Spur Preliminary; Whitford Surveying KPB File 96-008 10. Coal Creek Country Estates Trujillo Addition Kasilof; Preliminary Whitford Surveying KPB File 96-009 11. Westview Hills; northeast of Soldotna Revised Preliminary; Integrity Surveys KPB File 95-190 J. COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM CONSIDERATIONS -None K. OTHER/NEW BUSINESS 1. Ordinance 96-02: An Ordinance Establishing an Advisory Planning Commission for the Community of Funny River 2. A Resolution in Support of the Draft National Pollutant Dischazge Elimination System Permit Proposed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency L. ASSEMBLY COMMENTS M. DIRECTOR'S COMMENTS N. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS O. ADJOURNMENT 4 The next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting is January 22, 1996 at 7:30 p.m. in Conference Room B at the Borough Administration Building in Soldotna. PLEASE NOTE: A work session with the Assembly's Land Use Committee, Kenai River Working Group, and the Kenai River Special Management Area Board is scheduled for 5:00 p.m. in Conference Rooms A & B. The topic will be a proposed Kenai River ordinance and its associated timeline. MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATIONAL ITEMS NO ACTION REQUIRED 1. Soldotna Planning and Zoning Commission December 6, 1995 Minutes 2. Homer Advisory Planning Commission December 6, 1995 Minutes 3. Kenai Planning and Zoning Commission December 13, 1995 Minutes 4. Touchstone, Vol. 5 No. 6, December 1995 a i~a - a~sa CITY OF KENAI . ". "Ol( CQ~ifal o~ {~l z~~,Q~. -~ '~ ~~, ~- ..:_ ~ TO I The Continuum Corp. & Lynn Robbins/Robbins Retirement i Communities FROM Kim Howard 210 Fidalgo, , Keaai,.Alaska 99 ~~ .t"~ ~- ~ Phone 90 ~:U" ~ Fu 90`I-28~-~UY~ ,~ ~~Q - -_.._, ~ -~=-_= D o __ Date i / ~ / A ti Number of Pages 1 RzMABKS: At their December 27 meeting, the Planning & Zoning Commission agreed to hold a special meeting, on January 16 at 7 p.m., in the City Council chambers. The topic of discussion will be the I landscape site plan review for the assisted living complex. You should have received a faxed copy of the form and when completed it should be sent to Marilyn Kebschull, the Planning ~ and Zoning Secretary. She will need it by noon on January 9 to be included in the packet. Please let her know if you want the site plan that is in the building specifications that Leo Grasso submitted to the Building Official, included as an attachment. If there is any information that you want included in the City I Council packet for the January 17 meeting, Carol Freas, the City Clerk, will need it by noon on the 12th. Feel free to contact any of us if you have any questions. i cc: Marilyn Kebschull Carol Freas CITY OF KENAI ~~~ „Gil o~ yq~~~ ~- ~ 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99811-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 _ FAX 907-283-3014 ar tIII~- 1991 January 4, 1996 Ron Goecke P.O. Box 3474 Kenai, AK 99611 RE: REAPPOINTMENTS -COMMISSIONS/COMMITTEES City of Kenai At their regular meeting of January 3, 1996, the Kenai City Council confirmed your reappointment to the Planning & Zoning Commission. The Kenai City Council and City Administration thank you for the time and effort you have contributed and are willing to continue to contribute for the City. Your interest and endeavors on the Commission are examples of a dedicated citizen working for a better tomorrow for the City of Kenai. Congratulations and again, thank you. Sincerely, CITY OF KENAI Carol L. Freas City Clerk clf CITY OF KENAI ~ 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 FAX 907-283-3014 t~ll~l 1992 January 4, 1996 Karen J. Mahurin P.O. Box 1073 Kenai, AK 99611 RE: REAPPOINTMENTS -COMMISSIONS/COMMITTEES City of Kenai At their regular meeting of January 3, 1996, the Kenai City Council confirmed your reappointment to the Planning & Zoning Commission. The Kenai City Council and City Administration thank you for the time and effort you have contributed and are willing to continue to contribute for the City. Your interest and endeavors on the Commission are examples of a dedicated citizen working for a better tomorrow for the City of Kenai. Congratulations and again, thank you. Sincerely, CITY OF KENAI Carol L. Freas City Clerk clf CITY OF KENAI -- Gil c~ y4~~~ -, ~ 210 FIDALGO AVE., SUITE 200 KENAI, ALASKA 99611-7794 TELEPHONE 907-283-7535 _ _ FAX 907-283-3014 ~ rrer,rxr 1II~f1 ,~~ January 4, 1996 Teresa Werner-Quade 409 McCollum Drive Kenai, AK 99611 RE: REAPPOINTMENTS -COMMISSIONS/COMMITTEES City of Kenai At their regular meeting of January 3, 1996, the Kenai City Council confirmed your reappointment to the .Planning & Zoning Commission. The Kenai City Council and City Administration thank you for the time and effort you have contributed and are willing to continue to contribute for the City. Your interest and endeavors on the Commission are examples of a dedicated citizen working for a better tomorrow for the City of Kenai. Congratulations and again, thank you. Sincerely, CITY OF KENAI Carol L. Freas City Clerk clf RENAI RIVER SPECIAL MANAGEMENT AREA __. ADVISORY BOARD Thursday, December 7, 1995 Cook Inlet Aquaculture Association Building I. CALL TO ORDER A. Roll Call Members Present: Pat Bower, Jack LaShot, Ted Wellman, Robin Nyce, Duane Harp, Tom Knock, Lance Trasky, Jim H. Richardson, Ken Lancaster, Jim A. Richardson, Jeff King, Irv Carlisle, Mark Chase, Peggy Mullen, Ben Ellis, Chris Degernes. Members Absent: none B. Approval of November 16, minutes. The minutes were approved as corrected: roll call should have noted that Chris Degernes was present at the November meeting. C. Agenda Changes and Approval. No changes or additions. II. PUBLIC CObIIKENT Bill Stockwell suggested that when the Bylaws are discussed later, that the Board approve voting privileges for agency board members as well as public members as everyone needs to participate fully with the process. Also, on Page 2, D. of the Bylaws, he suggested that the board make a recommendation that the entire watershed needs to be of concern, more than just the KRSMA. III. NEW BUSINESS A. Upper Renai River Cooperative Plan Presentation - Emily Dekker-Fiala, USFWS and Diedre St.Louis, USFS Plan boundaries are Kenai Lake to Skilak Lake and to Lower Russian Lake, with a quarter mile corridor along each bank. The Plan was initiated because of the needs of the agencies to update existing plans, such as the Chugach National Forest's Forest Plan, the Kenai National Wildlife Refuge's Public Use Management Plan and DNR's revision of the Kenai River Comprehensive Management Plan. USFWS, USFS, DNR, ADF&G, the Kenai Peninsula Borough, and CIRI have been the key players in the planning process, and a number of public meetings were held to identify issues. In February, 1995, there was an excellent turnout in Cooper Landing, with the discussion focused on defining the future vision for the upper river area. Later, meetings were held on specific topics such as Recreation Opportunities, Habitat Protection, Facility Development, Education/Interpretation, Commercial Use, and Cultural Resources to further define the future vision. From these meetings, the "desired future December 7, 1995 - Meeting Minutes Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board condition" for the upper river was defined. Having the Desired Future Condition identified helps land managers to plan a variety of management strategies for maintaining that condition. Indicators will be chosen to monitor human-caused changes to the area, and when standards have been exceeded, agencies will implement their management strategies. Throughout the process the public will be involved so that they know up front what actions will be taken if the standards are exceeded. This process is applicable to other sections of the river, and the Board may want to consider using this idea for revising the Kenai River Comprehensive Management Plan. Jim A. Richardson asked how the upper river process could relate to our planning effort? Emily stated that the various agencies will adapt what they need for their respective plans, and that the upper river plan should be completed next fall. Board discussion continued for a few minutes regarding how this process could be adapted for the Comp Plan revision. B. Interagency Habitat Task Force Presentation - Doug Vincent-Lang, ADF&G, Sportfish Division This group originated from the Alaska Board of Fish's concern that riparian habitat impacts are caused in part by the in-river fishery, but the lack of technical information made it difficult to address the relationship. The Board of Fish asked for technical recommendations for the upcoming Board meeting, and the Sportfish Div. was assigned the responsibility for making these recommendations. Two studies were conducted during the 1995 season. One evaluated angler use and distribution patterns, quantifying the number of anglers and where they were located. They found that during the peak of the fishery, 1600 anglers were using the riparian area all along the river. While most of the use occurs in a few areas, there are no large areas of the river not currently utilized. Most of the use occurs on public land, but there is still significant use on private property. The second study was to evaluate the effects of angling on four different habitat types: grassy, shrubbed, treed, and denuded. Select sites were photographed before and after the fishery, and showed that bank anglers are impacting riparian habitats to varying degrees. Grassy habitats are the most vulnerable to impacts due to bank angling. 2 December 7, 1995 - Meeting Minutes ,_. Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board : A list of recommendations was made for the Board of Fish to consider, once an extensive public involvement process has been conducted. These include: -only allow fishing from approved structures or inriver; -only allow access to the river via grated boardwalks or other habitat friendly means; -create sanctuary areas where habitat would be preserved; -establish a rotational use pattern for riparian habitats -encourage use in less sensitive areas; -give the department emergency order authority to respond inseason to fishery related riparian habitat concerns; -only allow-camping in approved "hardened" areas; -restrict anglers from going ashore except in approved areas; , -only allow boats to moor from approved structures; -promote drift boat fishing along the river as an alternative to power boat use; -institute a public education process. The group recommended that the Board of Fish not close large sections of impacted habitats and thus force anglers onto unimpacted lands, resulting in greater habitat loss. The group also recommended that the Board not adopt regulations at the upcoming meeting which result in additional habitat loss that is avoidable. And lastly, the group recommended that the Board authorize emergency regulation authority to close areas of likely damage pre-season, or areas of unforeseen damage in-season. Irv asked if they looked at the areas after the flood to see what impacts the flood had. Doug responded that they have not looked at the river since the flood but felt that some of the impacted areas were probably wiped out. Lisa Parker asked what lands could be closed. Doug: they could close all state, federal, or local lands with the concurrence of the land owner. Ted mentioned temporary boat tie up for short term fishing, and was concerned that overzealous closures could force greater impacts onto other less impacted sites. Doug agreed that boat anchoring and tie ups are problems that still need work to address. Ted also asked about the criteria used to decide which areas are damaged enough to close. Doug: closure criteria will probably include: -was the land purchased for conservation purposes or habitat protection? -is there an on-going restoration project underway? -is it a large area of undisturbed land that is immediately - - ~ 3 December 7, 1995 - Meeting Minutes Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board threatened? -will the closure prompt fishing from finished restoration project? C. Kenai River Summit Report, Diedre St. Louis, USFS The Kenai River Summit held on November 1 brought together the top administrators of US Fish and Wildlife Service, US Forest Service, DNR, and ADF&G. The purpose was to inform the decision makers of these agencies regarding concerns and issues related to the Kenai River and inform them of the MOU between DNR/USFWS/USFS. The Summit covered threats to the ecosystem, why the KRSMA was created, current activities underway such as the Upper Kenai River Cooperative Plan, restoration and educational efforts. Recommendations were made to reevaluate the current MOU and consider whether other agencies (ADF&G and the Borough) should be included under the umbrella of this agreement. The Kenai River Comprehensive Management Plan revision process should be the focus for the new approach and a new MOU, according to Summit participants. D. Legislative Committee - Ben Ellis, Chairperson The Legislative Committee will make its recommendations to the Board before the February Board of Fish meeting. The committee would like to make broad recommendations instead of going through the Board of Fish proposals one by one, with the exception of the one proposal the Kenai River Board made last spring (prohibiting anchor dragging). The committee would like to bring "concepts" to the Kenai River Board, such as promoting ecosystem approaches, maintaining a diversity of species, maintaining access to the fishery, etc. IV. OLD BUSINESS A. Bylaw Revisions The main issue of debate was whether agency members should be permitted to vote or not. One potential problem is that the quorum for public members is five persons, so a majority of three could possibly pass an issue, and is this an appropriate outcome. Ted would not object to agency members voting unless he saw agency members control the board to its detriment, so he withdrew his earlier opposition to agency members voting. 4 December 7, 1995 - Meeting Minutes _... Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board _~ Jim H. R. favored voting by all members. Tom K, was in favor and thinks agency members are important to the overall balance. Mark C. stated that the Board will need to ensure that the process used for revising the management plan is carefully done, whether agency members vote or not won't matter if the process is flawed. Diedre S. stated that she has seen agency members abstain when there would be a conflict. Irv C. felt that agency folks are generally the best informed of the board members but.his biggest concern is the public perception that it's a bunch of bureaucrats voting for themselves; public perception is important, and for this reason, he opposed voting by agency members. Jeff K. felt the board should be unified, with its strength measured by its diversity. Ben E. supported voting by agency members. I) Ken L. agreed that better participation would be made if agency members voted. Pat B. stated that agency folks should vote as they also represent the public. Peggy M. agreed with agency voting. Jack L. supported agency votes as they represent a large segment of people. Lance T. felt that all members should vote because there would be more ownership in the process, and where there is a conflict of interest, the member should abstain. Jim A. R. agreed with agency members voting as it would improve the participation of all, and the cities and Borough would have a vested interest. The issue regarding whether agency members should vote was approved. The only other changes to the Bylaws were to make references to the entire watershed when referring to issues the Board would be concerned with. The Bylaws as amended were unanimously approved for forwarding to Commissioner Shively. 5 December 7, 1995 - Meeting Minutes Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board H. Permit Committee Report The Permit Committee recommended that the draft letter to Governor Knowles be finalized and sent. This letter addressed participation by the Attorney General's office on habitat violation cases. Regarding the Jim's Landing reconstruction alternatives proposed by USF&WS, the Committee recommended that Alternative A be supported. This alternative calls for maintaining the existing footprint of the roadbed, while reducing the impacts on wetlands and improving the riverbank riparian habitat. The committee recommended that no parking be permitted near the ramp or downstream from the ramp area, that the river bank be closed to foot traffic, and that the area be managed to discourage vehicles not associated with launching from using the area. A letter making these recommendations should be forwarded to USF&WS before January 5, 1996. The Board approved sending the letter to Governor Knowles and to the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Lance Trasky provided a brief summary of the status of the lands being considered for purchase using oil spill monies. On November 20, the EVOS Trustee Council authorized the purchase of 6 Kenai River and 2 Moose River parcels for habitat protection. The Kenai River parcels include: The Kobylarz parcel, Chester Cone's parcel, Salamatoff lands, the Kenai River Ranch, Irene Girves' parcel, and the Stephanka Tract. If the land owners accept the purchase offer, the lands will be purchased. The process for accepting nominations is still open, so future parcels may also be acquired. Lance also provided a briefing on the Kenai River Habitat Protection and Recreation Enhancement Project recently funded by the EVOS Trustees. This $2,000,000 project spread out over three years will provide restoration monies for public lands as well as provide recreation enhancements that will protect habitat, such as light penetrating boardwalks. A number of projects have been submitted and the criteria for ranking them is being developed now. Peggy asked if EVOS monies can be used for law enforcement to protect the newly acquired lands. Lance replied that operations funding is not available from the Trustee Council. C. Kenai River Comprehensive Management Plan Committee Report 6 December 7, 1995 - Meeting Minutes __ Renai~River Special Management Area Advisory Board _. Irv reported that the committee is looking at how to get the plan revision started, and how to address the changes since the 1986 plan. One option is to use the "Limits of Acceptable Change" process as a way to start. We have not been given clear direction on what if any resources available to us for proceeding with the planning process. Jim A. R. suggested that before the next meeting that each Board member take the time to develop their individual visions for the river segments, and a master list will be prepared to help us start the scoping phase. We'll need to try to incorporate the work already done on the Upper Kenai River, too. D. Draft Park Regulations Hearing - Update Suzanne. reported that at the regulation hearing held in late November, there was opposition from a few guides regarding the regulation which would limit the number of persons per motorized boat to six persons, since the US Coast Guard licenses limit the number already. Also, some felt that the regulation needed to address how motorized users of Skilak Lake would be affected. Other concerns expressed were that the rental boat permitting change did not reflect what a number of guides had recommended last spring, namely that rental boats be restricted to the same hours as guides. This may be an issue that can be addressed later once all the rental boats are under permit. V . PUBLIC CONIlKENT Tom Corr, Sr. stated that the reason he came this evening was because he thought he'd heard on the radio that no one would be able to fish from the banks of the river, and he was concerned about this possibility. IV. ADJOURNMENT A. Hoard Comments Robin West introduced himself as the new Kenai National wildlife Refuge Manager, and stated he will be involving the Board in scoping the Salamatoff public easement problem to address what can be done to solve that problem. B. Date/Agenda of Next Meeting The next meeting will be held at 7:00 pm on Thursday, January 11, 1996 at the Cook Inlet Aquaculture Association Building. The evening meeting will be proceeded by the following scheduled 7 Deceanber 7, 1995 - Meeting Minutes Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board Committee meetings: 2:00 - 3:00 pm: Permit Committee Meeting 3:00 - 5:00 pm: Management Plan Committee meeting Other committee meetings may be announced at a later date. Agenda topics will include more time to discuss the management plan, and a presentation on the Kenai River Community Forum that The Nature Conservancy is organizing for next spring. Respectfully submitted, Chris Degernes 8 1{ENAI ~EIVINSUL.A BOROUGH 144 N. BINKLEY ~ SOLDOTNA, ALASKA 99669-7599 ,.,-r ,. ~---.~ ~ BUSINESS (907) 262-4441 FAX (907)262-1892 '~' °' " ~ ~ '' ~g ~~ ,,• I~..i,`• Memorandum - '`\ -~ 4 ~ s~` _~ ~~~- 9~- GILMAN ,,~ti ~`~ fi` - .;. To: Kenai Peninsula Borough Assembly Land Use Committee CC: Kenai Peninsula Borough Planning Commission Kenai River Special Management Area Advisory Board Kenai River Working Group From: ~'arker, Planning Director Tom Boedeker, Borough Attorney Date: January 3, 1996 Subject: Kenai River Protection Area Ordinance -Proposed Timeline As requested, the following is a proposed timeline for consideration of the Kenai River Protection Area Ordinance. January 8, 1996 5:00 pm Review and discuss draft ordinance and timeline January 22, 1996 5:00 pm February 6, 1996 7:30 pm February 12, 1996 7:30 pm March 6, 1996 7:30 pm Finalize draft ordinance Ordinance introduced at Assembly meeting Planning Commission public hearing, considers and provides recommendation Assembly public hearing and consideration of ordinance Introduced by: Land Use Committee Date: Hearing: Action: Vote: ORDINANCE 96-RIVER KENAI PENINSULA BOROUGH AN ORDINAN --1 WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, NOW, THEREFORE, BE PENINSULA BOROUGH: BY ASSEMBLY OF THE KENAI a the of ordinances be enacted to read: ~~ ZONE ar~d rearing private pt~ ordinance within their of stagor federal aver ores for the protection of Kenai River salmon spawning :erg ~ that are applied in a consistent manner while recognizing siding cities within the watershed the option to administer the ~'It is the intent of this ordinance to avoid duplicating regulations minimize conflicts between those regulations and this ordinance. Xg.zx.020 Find~~igs. In enacting this ordinance the assembly finds numerous factors affect th~`liabitat of the Kenai River. Among others these include bank erosion, bank trampling, pollution, :~~u~t~tQUrisin~nfrastructure, unsuccessful attempts to remedy bank erosion or protect and r " e~« ~ ,inconsistent regulations, logging, grazing, mining, wetland fill and drainage, exca ~afit~m~and 'fill of property, dredging, ina ro riatel installed culverts fuel stora a and PP P Y g , maintenance of existing structures. The assembly finds that the sensitivity of the watershed requires general prohibition of activities within an area immediately adjacent to the Kenai River and only activities which do not damage the habitat are permitted. The assembly finds that certain activities Kenai Peninsula Borough Ordinance 96- Page 1 of having minor impact and that existing state, federal and local laws and regulations contain sufAcient controls on these activities that further regulation is not currently needed. xx.xx.030 Periodic Review. As part of its role in comprehensive planning the Planning Department shall prepaze an assessment of the benefits and effectiveness of this chapter every two yeazs. In preparing this evaluation the Planning Commission shall hold at least one public hearing. xx.xx.040 Habitat Protection Area Established. There is Habitat Protection Area within the Kenai River system. Except as ~ section, this area includes all lands wit~un 50 horizontal fee of the measured from the ordinary high water mazk or mean high w e in within this fifty-foot area consist of a 60 degree or more c the H. consist of the greater of 50 feet from the raver or to a pro' feet b Xx.xz.050 Prohibited activity within the Prot Area established by Section xx.xx.030 of this chapter, specifically allowed under Section xx.xx.060 or for wt Section xx.xx.070. ~ Xx.xx.060 Activities not requ may be conducted within the Habitat borough under this chapter. This sect permits that may be required by ano federal, state or local govcrnme conditioned upon obtaining all a 1 permits shall,~e considered on ~ enai River ovided in this r. This shall be Where the banks be conducted except those ~as been issued pursuant to rin •m activ' s specified in this section 'r tion ,III obtaining a permit from the now give rfies the necessity of obtaining apter the KP de or requirements of a permit from .ond of acti ' s listed in this section are expressly . Co t of activity without obtaining necessary ject to the provisions of Section xx.xx.090. ~t .issuance of a permit under this chapter: management (trimming, pruning, or removal of hazardous n ial recreational uses that do not involve construction, ion o of land 'on, installation, repair and maintenance of ladders, steps, floating abling and bio-remediation logs that are regulated by and require from the Alaska Department of Natural Resources, State Pazks 1, and the Alaska Department of Fish & Game. The activity must with all conditions and regulations imposed on such activity. A. , . ariance. A. An owner may apply for a variance to allow activities which aze ;, the Habitat Protection Area. Variance requests shall be approved or denied by the Pl mmission. A variance may not be approved unless it is determined the activity will be conducted in a manner that does not result in significant erosion, destruction of wetlands or riparian habitat, or result in or increase ground or water pollution. Variances aze conditioned upon compliance with all applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. In granting a variance, Kenai Peninsula Borough Ordinance 96- Page 2 of the Planning Commission may establish such conditions on the development, use or operation of the activity or facility for which the variance is granted as it determines necessary to prevent erosion, destruction of wetlands or riparian habitat, or result in or increase ground or water pollution. Additionally a variance may not be granted unless the Planning Commission determines that the owner will be deprived of all reasonable use of the property without a variance being granted. B. A person seeking a variance must make application to the Borough Planning Department. The application shall provide information describing the proposed activity and demo ` ate that the activity meets the conditions for variance. The Planning Commission has obl' ' °on to ascertain whether special conditions can be developed or imposed unless the appli : bmitted adequate information to demonstrate that the proposed methods or c 'ons to the impacts of the activity within the protection area. If the Planning Co ssion det osed acti ' will cause erosion, destruction of wetlands or riparian hab or resin , r in d or er `'# X pollution it shall deny a variance for the requested acti Xz.xz.070 Prior Existing uses. Any activity tha ' ~ r limited under this chapter that is in existence on the effective date of this chapter con ~ t permit. Such activity or use may not be altered, expanded, or extended. E aeon, altera _ nsion of the activity or use will result in full application of the pro ' _ _ chapter. Xg.xz.080 Administration by es - e al proceedings. A. The ~~ administration and enforcement of this ~ finance y be en by a city. B. A city wishing to a ster nforce ordinance shall enact an ordinance adopting the provisions of this " er b ference, viding the. city will undertake the administration of the ordinance ' njunc ' 'th 'stration of land use regulations and building and,health codes the within 30 days of passage of the ordinance the Mayor shall transfer the ~ _ tion an ent to the city. The City may relinquish and transfer~he a tration ~" ° ~" ment back to the borough by ordinance, however the transfer ~. ;,r ~ ~, .~. shall not take eff til 9 e commencement of a new fiscal year for the borough, ~;: whichever is grey ,. ~ ' C. hf ci _~ _ ,, es a ation of this chapter variance determinations shall be made by the city; planning =c or by the city council, as provided. by ordia~ance. Appeals or legal proceedings taken from on~:.o a city in administering shall be the sole responsibility of the city. ~ ~ Xz.xx.090 Pena for violation. Any person who violates a provision of this chapter shall b~¢g~ilty of a misdem or and may be subject to a fine of $300 for each violation. Each day hat a~viol~tion continues~s all be considered a sepazate offense. ' >~ ~XXx:xx.100 Conflict with City Land Use Regulation. To the extent this'ohapter may corifii~€ax any previous delegation of land use regulation authority from the borough, such land use regulation and zoning authority is modified or limited so as not to conflict with this chapter. _ This chapter shall control over the provisions of any co~icting city ordinance or code. Kenai Peninsula Borough Ordinance 96- Page 3 of Xx.gx.110 For the Purposes of this Ordinance 1. "Cut bank" shall mean banks of the Kenai River with exposed soil surface that have occurred from natural or manmade causes whether the exposed surface extends to the high water mazk or not. 2. "Ordinary high water mark" shall have the definition given in l I AAC 53.900(23) as it currently exists or as it may be renumbered or revised. 3. "Mean high water line" or "ordinary high water line" shall have the definition given in I 1 AAC 53.900(15) as it currently exists it may be renumbered or revised. 4. "Erosion" shall mean significant slou hing, w discharge of soil arising from manmade sources or ca 5. "Riparian habitat" shall mean eas wi t to the ri containing sp$wning and r habitat sal t de immediate cover or stability ` satin and eggs ~~ ~ ! ~ s of development. 6. "Wetlands" shall have the me 16 USC § 1302 as applied to land within the habitat protection 7. "Ground or water pollution" me ge, application, spread or release of chemicals, toxic 'als, fue ,fertilizers on or into the soil and waters wi 1 ~ rotecti 8. "Kenai River" me ~ m ~~ the r' from the outlet of Kenai Lake to the mouth udinst SECTION 2. That this ordinance e of days after its enactment. ENACTED BY THE ASSE OF KEN ~ ENINSULA BOROUGH THIS DAY OF ~. Andrew I'': Scalzi, Assembly President A Vaughan,, Bo h Clerk Kenai Peninsula Borough Ordinance 96- Page 4 of CITY OF KENAI PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION **AGENDA** ADENDUM 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS: a. PZ96-1, Conditional Use Permit, Katmai Hotel, Halfway House Letters against proposed permit: (NOTE: Listed In Order Received) 1. Mrs. Arlene H. Moll 2. Dawn Craig 3. Thomas Rhyner 4. Mary Zolman 5. Edward & Dani Sue Fortner 6. Angela King 7. Mary Lopez 8. Daniel A. Conetta 9. Christine Lagoutarie 10. Larry W. Jackson 11. Jennifer Daniels 12. Wayne Tressler 13. Paula Tobin 14. Kimberly Cowie 15. D. DeMitta 16. Paul & Page Rhodes 17. Lori M. Andersen 18. Shanette Wik 19. Frances Butler 20. Donna M. Messer 21. John P. Gensel 22. Peggy Cartwright Letter withdrawing permit application: Jim Singree 12. INFORMATION ITEMS: 23. Autumn Steiner 24. Viann Mack 25. Karin Gensel 26. Tammy Bidwell 27. Kathe Groleske 28. Dawn M. Brighton 29. Laurel Carlton 30. Trish A. Dorman 31. Judilee Forrest 32. Valerie Malanaphy 33. Joanne Byford 34. Richard K. Yoder, Jr. 35. Pam Nuccio (?) 36. Tim Howard 37. Pat Walton 38. Mary Booth 39. Patricia Pierce 40. Kimberly Andres 41. Tim Iverson 42. Mark Langfelt 43. Maurice L. Peterson 44. Julie Marcinkowski d. Minutes from Kenai River Advisory Board, December 7, 1995 e. Proposed Kenai River Protection Area Ordinance Information 1 L~ N .~ ao ~C a a a o aaa ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ W W ~ ~ i~ ~ ti D ~ ~ 0q0 p a z U ~ W U W D ~ A 4 C7 S C7 R C p m qW p Ot z a W a ~ H z 04 ~ ~+ 0~4 W a ~ o a ~ ~ D ~ l _m W a ~ ° ~ °D ~ W z o a o a C ~ m 7~- p ao a ~ z a W a H a w ° ~ ~ a ° ~ a a ~ c ti a D ~ o0 w ° a 0 a ~ z z a W a ~ ~ ~ a ~ a ~ m ~ ~_ 1~ SIGN IN SHEET PUBLIC HEARING--JANUARY 10, 1996 NAME ADDRESS 1 ~ ~ _... r 2 F 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10~ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Page 1