Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 2006-66Suggested by: Council CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 2006-66 A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, DIRECTING THE CONTINUATION OF THE PROJECT ENTITLED "ANGLER DRIVE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT" AND DESIGNATING WHAf IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO BE INCLLDED IN THIS PROJECI'. WHEREAS, the Councll directs the City Administration to continue with this project; and, WHER~AS, the following is a list of major improvements that are scheduled to be completed under this project: l. Preparation of existuig surfaces; 2. Drainage improvements (as neededj; 3. Reconstruclion of ditches/replacement of culverts (as needed~; 4. Crushed aggregate base course and asphalt paving; and, WHEREAS, the Council finds the improvements are necessary and of benefit to the properties to be assessed; and, WHEREAS, the local improvement district costs will be allocated on a methodology recogniz.ing equally, the property's square footage, the property's Kenai Peninsula borough assessed value, and the number of properties included in the Iocal improvement district For puxposes of calculatin~ square footage, the un-subdivided properties and Tract 3, Anglers Acres Subdivision, Lowe Addition, the properties' dcpth. are limited to 150 feet; and, WHEREAS, a petition was submitted to the city that was signed by the owners of fifty percent (50%) or more of the properties which will be benefited by the proposed improvements; and, WHER~AS, an account will be kept of all costs of the improvements and that after all costs are known, the City Manager shall prepare an assessment roll for the improvements; and, WHEREAS, all oI the above impirovements will be done in this area but only fifty percent (50%J of the total completed improvements will be assessed to the benefited property owners; and, WHEREAS, this resolution will be mailed to each property owner adjacent to the streets designated for improvements; and, WHEREAS, the property owner's name and address used will be that which is on record at tlie Kenai Peninsula Borough on this date, December 6, 2006. RESOLUTION NO. 2006-66 PAGE 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the City will continue with the project entitled "Angler Drive Spec:ial Assessment District" and the improvements listed above. PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF F~NAI, ALASKA, t17is siYth day of December, 2006. ~~~ ~~~ PAT PORTER, MAYOR ATTEST: ~ F ~ ___~~ f Carol L. Freas, ity Clerk clf Approved by Finance:~ Page I of l~ Carol Freas From: Paul Mansur [pmansur@gorge.net] Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 4:45 PM To: Carol Freas Cc: rick pert; Jeff Mansur; Dan Barrett; Bill Barrett; Alan Ryan Subject: Angler Drive proposed paving Carol, We are opposed to the project plan as it exists. The proposed assessments of from $3500 to $5500 for our lot are way too expensive. A~so, we believe the Borough should pay foc it ~ 00%; thaYs why we pay property taxes and Borough taxes. I was a Forest Service Manager on several Districts where I was in charge of maintaining hundreds of miles of Forest Service roads. We found when we paved existing gravel roads that had been in place for a number of years and had a good base course that it could be done very inexpensively. The savings we realized in reduced grading costs over a ten year span wouid almost pay for the paving job. We believe this proposai is another case of over engineering a project. it wouid be great but iYs too expensive. Although two years ago we expressed an interest in getting the road paved we had no idea it would be this costly. We think you should go back to the drawing board with this project. Thanks for giving us an opportunity to give you our feedback Paul Mansur Dan Barrett 11/27/2006 .~ ~~' ,` ~_-, L~ / `~V ~~a~e wit~t a Past, Gc~ wit~r a Fr~ture" 210 Fidalgo Avenue, Kenai, Alaska 99611-7794 ~ Telephone: (907) 283-7535, Ext. 236 / FAX: (907) 283-3014 ~IIII~ 1992 `` ~~e"~°f ~~ MEMORANDUM KENA~ SKA TO: Rick Koch, City Manager FROM: Keith Kornelis, Public Works Manager C~ DATE: November 29, 2006 SUBJECT: Angler Drive ~ID - 2006 Attached is Wm. J. Nelson & Associates proposal for engineering services on Angler Drive Paving LID - 2006. His not-to-exceed fee of $48,410 is under our estimated buget. The funds are available in the City account FY06 StreeUSewer Construction (753-450-8098). A purchase order has been prepared for Council approval on December 6, 2006, after the public hearing and approvai of Council resolution directing the City administration to continue with this project. Proposal to Provide Engineering Services Angier Drive Paving LID 2006 CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA r _ _._ __ ~ , ._ , I NOV 2 9 2006 ,. ......_: ~_ .. , Submitted By: Wm. J. Nelson & Associates 155 Bidarka Street Kenai, Alaska 99611 November 29, 2006 t~~ ~ J, N~I~an ~ A~~ ~ CONSULTING ENGINEERS 155 BIDARKA STREET (907) 2833583 November 29, 2006 Keith Kornelis, Public City of Kenai 210 Fidalgo Kenai, Alaska 99611 Works Manager STRUCTURAL CIVIL ENVIRONMENTAI KENAI, ALASKA 99611 FAX (907) 283-4514 Re: Angler Drive Paving LID 2006 -Design and Inspection Proposal Dear Mr. Kornelis, My proposal for the Angler Drive LID is attached. I will be the Principal in charge of Yhis project. I will provide project review and design input. Biake Larson, PE will be the design engineer. I propose to use Whitford Surveying to provide the design survey. I assume that the road prism consists of all non frost susceptible soils and as a result no geotechnical investigation is planned for this projecf. This project will include `strip paving' only and no excavation of the road prism is planned. All design work will be performed in my office, located at 155 Bidarka Street, Kenai. We will begin surveying promptly upon receipt of NoYice To Proceed. I currentty carry $1,000,000 professional liability insurance. I propose to provide the design and construction inspection for this project for a Not-to Exceed fee of $48,410. An estimated fee breakdown is attached for your review. Sincerely, ~~i~~f/ ~x%~%~/ l~u~~-°.- Wm. J. Nelson, PE CONTENTS ~ ~ PROJECT MANAGEMBNT Narrative SCOPE WORK PLAN QUALIFICATIONS Specialized Experience Relevant to This Project Partial Project List - Similar Projects COST PROPOSAL Project Budget for LID Paving Improvements Fee Schedule for Additional Services PROJECT MANAGEMENT Wm. J. Nelson, PE will be the principal responsible for the completion of the design and inspection services. Mr. Nelson will be the contact for the City a~~d will be in aYCendance at Che public hearings, utility meetings, eta Mr. Nelson will also coordinate and supervise the work of others on the projeet. Mr. Nelson will provide in-house design review and supervision of the work as it progresses. The field surveying will be provide by Whitford Surveying. Blake Larson will be Yhe design engineer for the project. SCOPE The project Scope includes the provision of Engineering, Design Surveying, and Construction InspecYion services for paving improvements to for the Angler Drive Paving LID. These street are currently maintained by the City of Kenai and were builY Yo City sfandards and it is assumed that the road prism consists of all non frost susceptible gravel and sand. As a resulC, only minimal excavation in the road prism will be required for this paving project. Excavation will be limited Yo shaping and grading the road surface in preparation for paving. It is assumed that no profile changes, or subgrade excavation will be required except for minor reshaping of the surface material as may be needed fo establish a road crown. Existing drainage patterns will be maintained and drainage wi11 be directed Yo exisYing diCches along the road. Existing driveway culverts and cross culverts will be left in place, unless they are found to be ineffective, in which case they will be evaluated and replaced on a case by case basis. WORK PLAN TASK 1: Field Survey * Secure copy of plat to determine right of way for proposed improvements. * Recover property comer monuments as required to establish survey confrol. * Record road centerline profile, shoulders, ditchline, location of existing driveways, intersections. Topo street and ditches. * L,ocate power poles, telephone pedestals, signed only, underground utilities will not be located. TASK 2: Preliminary Design * Prepare plan base maps 1" = 40', show right of way. * Plot utility IocaYions per field survey. * Show existing and proposed centerli»e profile. * Design paving cross section utilizing Kenai Standard Improvement Drawings. * Make driveway approach schedule. * Design drainage improvements; ditching. , * Determine final bid items, quantifies. * Prepare details for special construction at driveways/intersections. * Submit (1) copy of preliminary plans for review af 95% complete. * AtYend one publie hearing regarding the project. TASK 3: Final Design * IncorporaYe CiYy review comments into plans. * Prepare bid ready plans, specificaYions for final submittal. TASK 4: Bidding * Prepare quantity information for advertisement for bids. * Conduct pre-bid conference. * Prepare addenda as necessary. * Tabulate bids, evaluate and make written recommendaYion for award. TASK 5: Construction Inspection * Act as the CiYy's representaCive to monitor compliance with pians, specifications and design intent. * Conduct pre-construction meeting with contractor, review submissions regarding schedule, subcontractors, bonding, insurance, issue NTP. * Provide construction observation as required to assure compliance with contract plans and specifications. * Determine actual quantities of bid items installed as required for determining payment to Contractor. * Log daily acYivities, provide daily field report. * Direct changes consistent with design but made necessary due to field conditions which do not affect project schedule or budget. * Prepare necessary change orders with justification, cost backup and classify as to change in scope, changed conditions or error/omission by the consultant. * Certify subsYantial completion and prepare punch lisC. * CerYify final acceptance. SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE All of these projects included design survey to locate existing structures and driveways in order to adjust street grades to minimize impact on access to existing buildings highly developed areas. Design also included field verification and plotting of locations of existing utilities and design to minimize conflicta City of Kenai-Basin View Subdivision Street reconstruction, paving improvements City of Kenai-Main Street/Mission Avenue 2000 Street reconstruction, paving and storm drain improvements City of Soldotna 1995 Street Improvements 7500 lineal feet of municipal road improvements. Work included reconstruction of gravel street, paving, storm drain, curb and gutters. Design included innovative storm water outfall system. City of Homer 1995 Accelerated Roads Project 3400 linea] feet of gravel road reconstruction and paving. Design included excavation of unsuitabte soils within shuctural section and design of geogrid subgrade reinforcement. City of Kenai-Setnet Drive/Setnet Court Paving 35001ineal feet of municipal street improvements. Project included excavation, embankment required to widen existing road section, paving, ditch improvement, design and ADEC approval of drainage infiltration structure. City of Kenai-O1dCown Street Improvemeots 1800 lineal feet of municipal sCreet improvements. Project included excavation, embankment required to widen existin~ road section, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalks and intersection illumination. ~ii~~ .~~ ~~I~ ~ A~~~ ~ CONSULTING ENGINEERS 155 BIDARKA STREET (907)283-3583 STRUCTURAL CIVIL ENVIRONMENTAL KENAI, ALASKA 9961'1 FAX (907) 283-4514 Fee Scheduie Engineering/inspection Personnel Registered Civii/Structural Engin2er Civil Engineer, PE Staff Engineer, EIT AutoCad Technician Inspector Clerical Regular Time 135.00 per hr. 95.00 per hr 80.00 per hr 65.00 per hr 75.00 per hr 40.00 per hr Direct Project Expenses Third Party Charges Invoice Cost Plus 10% Vehicle .50 / mile Angler Drive 4600 ft Wm. J. Neison & Associates=Fee Pro osal Nov 29, 2006 Task Ptsncr5a~ PE ' ET't' ' C~dd ~ts etrn Ex ~se :' Descri zan Ratelhr StrrsFe ; 5135 S95 $80 ~65 S75 $7,260 Design Survey 8 $5,900 1]~esi n : 0 8 ~~ 0 0 0 $5,900 $1Rj4SQ Project Admin 8 Utility Locates Test Holes ~ Public Hearing 4 Base Maps 24 Tifle Sl~eet/Index/Control S 8 P1an and Profile (6 sheets) 6 48 48 Detuls/Typical Sec[ians 2 16 16 Speciflcations 16 Bid SchedulelCost Estimate 8 Pnnting/Binding $500 Pla~~s/Specs 16 100 0~~ 96 0 $500 Conetraction Adtqin/Ins ecCion ~, $18 866 Advertise For Sids N/A Con[ractor's Questfons 8 Pr~Bid Meeting/Addenda 2 Bid Analysis/Recommendation 4 Cqmpac~ion testing $1,500 Subcon[ract Conetruction Adnnn 8 2A Vehicle mileage InspectiQn 160 Vehicle mileage~ Asbuilts ~ 8 C:on[r. Redlines 8 38 0 8 160 $1,500 Total Pee $40,270 ~ Ex enses W/m~rku $8,140 TotaL• T~tal Fee +:~xpenses :~~~ ~.: ~48a41i)