The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution No. 2005-48CITY OF KENAI RESOLUTION NO. 2005-48 Suggested by' Council A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, DIRECTING THE CONTINUATION OF THE PROJECT ENTITLED "SET NET DRIVE (FROM VIP DRIVE TO WATERGATE WAY)" AND DESIGNATING WHAT IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO BE INCLUDED IN THIS PROJECT. WHEREAS, the Council directs the City Administration to continue with this project; and, WHEREAS, the following is a list of major improvements that are scheduled to be completed under this project' o 2. 3. 4. Excavation, backfill, and grading Asphalt paving Topsoil and seeding Signage and traffic control; and, WHEREAS, the Council finds the improvements are necessary and of benefit to the properties to be assessed; and, WHEREAS, the local improvement district costs will be allocated on a square footage basis extending one lot deep adjacent to improvements in this subdivided area; and, WHEREAS, the project is not objected to by owners of properties bearing fifty (50%) percent or more of the estimated costs to be borne by property owners; and, WHEREAS, an account will be kept of all costs of the improvements and that after all costs are known, the City Manager shall prepare an assessment roll for the improvements; and, WHEREAS, all of the above improvements will be done in this area but only fifty percent {50%) of the total completed improvements will be assessed to the benefited property owners; and, WHEREAS, this resolution will be mailed to each property owner adjacent to the streets designated for improvements; and, WHEREAS, the property owner's name and address used will be that which is on record at the Kenai Peninsula Borough on this date, November 2, 2005. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, that the City will continue with the project entitled "Set Net Drive (from VIP Drive to Watergate Way) and the improvements listed above. Resolution No. 2005-48 Page 2 PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this second day of November, 2005. PAT PORTER, MAYOR ATI'EST: Carol L. Freas, City Clerk clf Approved by Finance' .... Set Net Drive - from VIP to Watergate ' ' PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL (Pre-Bid) ~ ...... Based on property OWners paying' proportionally based on square footage` Below costs are estimates - final cost will be based on the actual cost of the project. ProPerties to be assessed: See prOperty owners Spread Sheet I'D ' property ..... KPB 25% KPB 100°/~ of LID 50%'of/./D # OWNER Address ACRE Square Feet % of Total Ass. $ Ass. $ Est. $ Est.$ Owner I Driskill ' 750 SET NET DJ~ 0.92 ' ' 40.,.075 ' '0.079792 '1'84,200 '46,050 17,554 8,~77 2 Johnson 740 SET NET DR 0.98 42,689 0.084996 137,100 34,275 18,699 9,350 3 Whannell 2560 SEINE CT 1.06 46,174 ' '0.091934 153,400 38,350 20,225 10,113 4 Durkee' 620 SET NET DR 0.92 40,075 0.079792 220,500 55,125 17,554 8,777 5 Chapman 610 SET NET DR 1.06 46,174 0.091934 201,300 50,325 20,225 10,113 '~ qingham '2600 WATERGATE 1.02 44,431 0.088465 14,500 3,625 19,462 9,731 !'.ith !615 SET NET DR 0.92 40,075 0.079792 14,500 3,625 17,554 8,777 ~Ogland 2705 SEINE ST 1.09 47,480 0.094536 116,200 29,050 20,798 10,399 9 Leighty 735 SET NET DR 1.37 59,677 0.118820 173,900 43,475 26,141 13,070 10 Burch 745 SET NET DR 1.08 47,045 0.093669 200,200 50,050 20,607 10,304 i'1 Aase 755 SET NET DR 1.11 48,3521 0.096271 14,500 3,625 21,180 10,590 TOTAL 11.53 502,247 1.000000 22(~,000 110,000 Administration 3,000 Muni Match Grant (50%) 1'10,000 Engineering 31,000 Property Owners (50%) . 110,000 Construction 186,000 ' TOTAL 22b',000 i TOTAL 220,000 · . . . .. , , i ,, , , ....... , ,~ ,, · Prepar. ed by Keith Kornelis 9/8/2005 ,, Set Net Drive - From VIP to Watergate PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE ,, I 8/10/05 KK .... · . Units Est. Quantity Unit Price TOtal ,, , Clearing &. Crubbing LS 1 1,000 1,000 Unusable Excavation CY 580 8 4,640 ,, Type I Classified Fill & Backfill CY 1,000 10 10,000 , , Leveling Course SY 3,800 5 19,000 Construct Road Approach EA 4 750 3,000 Construct Driveway Approach EA 11 500 5,500 2 "AC Pavement SY 3,500 15 52,500 Reconstruct Ditches LF 2600 ~ 4 10,400 Drainage Improvements LS 1 3,000 3,000 Culverts LF 154 26 4,004 !CMP End Section EA 22 242 5,'324 Topsoil MSF 25 2'50 6,250 Seeding MSF 25 100 2,500 Remove & Relocate Signs EA 6 100 600 Traffic Maintenance LS I 2,000 2,000 Existing utilities in Const. Zone LS 1 5,000 5,000 Mobiliazati°n 8, Demobilization LS I 10,000 10,000 Force Account Work LS 1 10,000 10,000 Basic Bid 154,718 ContingenCy (20%) 30,944 Basic Bid Plus Cont. 185,662 ,, ,, BASIC ESTIMATE Administration 3,000 3,000 Engineering DeSign (10%) 18,566 '19,000 Inspection (7%) 12,996 12,000 .., Construction 185,662 186,000' , , TOTAL 220,224 220,000 Prepared by Keith Kornelis 9/7/2005 Page 1 Carol Freas '-rom' nt: Cc: Subject: Joe and Ruby Cobus [jrcobus@gci.net] Thursday, October 27, 2005 12:24 PM Carol Freas jrcobus@gci.net Proposed Assessment Proposed .Assessment.txt October 27,2005 Coral L Freos City Clerk City of Kfnoi bear Carol Freo$' I, Ruby E. Cobus (Binghom), The owner of Parcel No 4941037, wish to voice my objection to the proposed assessment for the paving of 5et Net Drive, from VIP Drive to Wotergote Way. [ feel that this is unfair to bose on assessment on the square footage of the owners property! I hove never heard of this method of assessment. Usually assessments are based proportionally -the frontage of property that faces the street. The parcel of property .,,entioned above faces Wotergote Way. The address of the property is 2600 Wotergate Way. Three times as much of the property faces Watergote Way os faces Set Net Drive. I am being assessed os though oil of the property faced ,Set Net Drivel I also own the parcel next to this one, on which my home is located. That address is 2610 Watergote Way. If, in some distant future, I decided to build o home on the parcel, whose side is on Set Net Drive, the entrance to the property would be from Wotergote Way. A second objection I have to this assessment is that consideration is not based on whether the 5¢t Net property is row land or ~ residence. Third, assessed value of the property played no port in the assessment. Hence, a property valued at $220,500. is assessed less than property assessed at $14,500. This assessment is extremely skewed. I do not now, nor will I ever enter my property from 5et Net Drive. It's future paving is of little importance to me, os I never use that street. If those home owners that use Set Net Drive os the entrance street to their homes wish to hove the street paved, then it should be at their expense. Owner of Parcel No 4941037 Ruby E. Cobus MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Subject: Chuck Kopp, Acting City Manager Larry Semmens, Finance Director/-t~fi~ November 10, 2005 Set Net LID Council tabled Resolution 2005-48 awaiting further information from us. There is a policy issue that needs to be decided due to the fact that three of the benefited properties are raw land with assessed values that will not allow the full assessment to be charged on. This is due to our code provision that the assessment not exceed 25% of the fair market Value after giving consideration to the value of the improvement. We have discussed some options for addressing this situation, but I think we should wait to get Keith Komelis' comments prior to moving forward on this project. I recommend that the council postpone action on Resolution 2005-48 until we have time to work up options and make a recommendation.