HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution No. 2007-24,~~~=~iJxC~ ~f ~~u7
Suggested by:
CITY OF KENAI
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, SUPPORTING
PASSAGE OF THE ALASKA GASLINE INDUCEMENT ACT (AGIA) XN ORDER TO
ENCOURAGE THE EXPEDITED DEVELOPMENT OF ALASKA'S NATURAL GAS
RESOURCES.
WHEREAS, the City of Kenai recognizes the importance ofthe development of Alaska's
natural gas resources for the national and state economies and to ensure a supply of
natural gas for the State's people, their businesses, residences, and other needs and
uses; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Kenai recognizes the need'to expedite the development of
Alaska's natural gas resources in a manner t11at provides for utilization and
development consistent with the public interest and for the maximum benefit of
Alaska, its people, their businesses, residences, and other needs and uses; and,
WHEREAS, the construction of a gas pipeline is necessary to the development of
Alaska's natm~al gas resources for state and national markets; and,
WHEREAS, a clear and definite timetable and commitment for construction of a gas
pipeline is necessary; and,
WHEREAS, the stated purpos the AGIA introduced by Governor Sarah Palin is to
encourage the developmenAlaska's gas resources in a competitive process by
offering incentives to comp nies that produce the State's gas resources and companies
that can build a pipeline;~and,
WHEREAAS, AGIA~'ears to offer inducements that are reasonably calculated to
bring about the expe ited development of Alaska's natural gas resources in a
competitive proces and in a manner that appears to provide for utilization and
development consistent with the public interest and for the maximum benefit of Alaska
and its people.
NOW, THE { li ORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI,
ALASKA, in - rder to promote the expedited development of Alaska's natural gas
resources, he Kenai City Council supports passage of the Alaska Gasline Inducement
Act (AG offered by Governor Sarah Palin and that copies of this resolution be
forward to Governor Palin, Lt. Governor Sean Parnell, and all members of the 25i~>
PASSED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF KENAI, ALASKA, this 16th day of May,
2007.
PAT PORTER, MAYOR
Resolution No. 2007-24
Page 2
ATTEST:
Carol L. Freas, City Clerk
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF AGIA
March 5, 2007
PURPOSE: To encourage expedited development of Alaska's gas resources by offering incentives
to companies that produce the state's gas resources and companies that can build a pipeline.
INCENTIVES FOR PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION: The state offers to match up to $500 million of
the costs that the licensee will incur to obtain a certificate from the Federal Energy Regulatory
Cornrnission or Regulatory Commission of Alaska. The state will appoint a state pipeline
coordinator who will be empowered to coordinate amongst the state regulatory agencies with
permitting responsibilities. The state will develop its qualified Labor force to support project
construction and operations.
INCENTIVES FOR GAS COMMITMENT: The state will adopt regulations to provide
predictability in the determination of royalty value and its exercise of its right to take its royalty
share in kind as gas or in value a~s money. The state also offers a production tax exemption for gas
committed to the pipeline equal to the difference between the taxpayer's tax obligation defined in
the tax ]aw at "open season" (i.e, on the day the fast solicitation of gas commitments ends), and
any higher obligation that becomes effective for ten years after pipeline start-up.
LICENSE REQUIREMENTS: In order for applications to be evaluated, they must commit to the
sixteen requirements in AGIA; including, in particular:
I. a commitment to solicit firm commitments to ship gas on the pipeline within 3 years of
getting the license (the open season),
2. a firm date by which the applicant will apply to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or
Regulatory Commission of Alaska for a certificate authorizing the pipeline
3. a commitment to certain financial provisions that will keep tariff rates low
4. a commitment to solicit demand for pipeline expansion at Least every two years, to expand
when there is sufficient need, and to collect the cost of any expansions through "rolled-in"
rates that pass expansion costs onto all slippers so long as rates do not increase more than a
fixed amount above initial rates,
5. a description of how cost overrun risks will be managed
6. a commitment to have at least five delivery points in Alaska
7. a commitment to hire qualified Alaskans for construction and operation of the gas pipeline
APPLICATION REVIEW CRITERIA: The Commissioners evahiate the applications under the
seven criteria in AGIA:
1. proposed project timeline
2. proposed method to manage cost overruns
3. proposed tariff rate structure
4. the ability of the project design to accornrnodate expansion
5. how rnueh of the state matching fund will be used and the riming of the state's payments
6. whether the project is feasible ~
7. the applicant's ability to perform ~
m
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF AGIA
March 5, 2007
PROJECT PROCESS: The project begins when the Commissioners issue a request for applications
no more than three months after AGIA passes. The application deadline wilt be established by the
Commissioners in the notice. The Commissioners will publicly release complete applications and
take comments for 60 days. Applicants can apply to protect proprietary information or trade secrets
included in their applications. The Commissioners forward a wririen decision recommending award.
The legislature will then have 30 days after that notice to disapprove the Commissioners' proposed
action.
After a license is awarded, the licensee must complete an application to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission or Regulatory Commission of Alaska. The licensee must sanction the
projecC within a year of receiving a certificate from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission if it
has adequate financing. If necessary, the licensee has an additional four years to obtain financing or
rt~ansfer the certificate, and all associated work product, to another licensee designated by the state.
If the project becomes uneconomic after the license is awarded, AGIA describes a process for
relinquishing the license that wilt enable the state tosecover the benefit of its investment in the
project by issuing another licensee. To encourage the licensee to commit to spend funds building
the pipeline, the state agrees that if it provides financial benefits to another group to encourage the
construction of a compethig pipeline project after the license is issued, the licensee is entitled to
recover three times the amount it spent on the project from the state.
N
on
a